Active clinical trials for "Acute Lung Injury"

This is a Phase 2 randomized study to assess the safety and efficacy of COVI-MSC in the setting of current standard of care treatments for subjects hospitalized subjects with acute respiratory distress syndrome not related to COVID-19 infection.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the intravenous (IV) or paravertebral (PV) lidocaine administration during the intraoperative period of lung resection surgery on the appearance of postoperative complications. We design a randomized, controlled and blinded study to be performed in 153 patients with 3 arms: 1) Lidocaine IV + PV saline 2) saline IV + PV lidocaine, 3) remifentanil IV + PV saline. Perioperative analysis of inflammatory biomarkers in bronchoalveolar lavage and serum. Follow-up of the postoperative course, especially the appearance of postoperative complications according to the revised Clavien-Dindo classification for thoracic surgery, as well as other relevant clinical results.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) patients will be randomized to receive either IC14 (a single dose of 4 mg/kg followed by 2 mg/kg on Days 2-4) or placebo. Study participation will be for a total of 28 days.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of prolonged low-dose methylprednisolone infusion on pulmonary function (LIS and ventilation-free days), extra pulmonary organ function (PMODS score), inflammatory markers - RCP (Reactive C Protein), IL6 (Interleukine 6), TNFα (Tumor Necrosis Factor), IL8 (Interleukine 8), IL10 (Interleukine 10) and length of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) stay in early ALI/ARDS in children.

This is a double-blind, placebo-controled, randomized trial to investigate if aspirin pre-treatment has anti-inflammatory effects in a model of acute lung injury induced by inhaled endotoxin (LPS) in healthy human volunteers.

This study is designed to exam the effects of early management with high frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) on patients with lung injury. Patients at risk for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) will be enrolled and randomized to one of two groups. One group will be managed with HFPV. The second group will be managed with conventional ventilation utilizing lung protective techniques. The primary endpoint of the study is rate of ventilator associated pneumonia. We hypothesized that use of HFPV in patients at risk for the development of ARDS will decrease the rate of ventilator associated pneumonia when compared to patients managed with conventional ventilation.

A study of intubated critically ill patients infected with SARS-COV-2 to evaluate the safety and treatment effects of ultraviolet-A (UVA) light administered by a novel device via endotracheal tube in a first-in-human study. Study hypothesis was that respiratory SARS-CoV-2 viral burden would significantly decrease following five (5) days of UVA therapy.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the availability and diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care bedside lung ultrasound examination in management of mechanical ventilation in neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome.

In modern anesthesia practice, the application of cricoid pressure during intubation is not infrequently used with the goal of preventing gastric-to-pulmonary aspiration. The evidence to support this practice is very scarce, and there have recently been many reports in the literature questioning the safety of cricoid pressure during intubation. Therefore, the goal of this study will be to randomize those at risk for microaspiration to receive cricoid pressure versus no cricoid pressure during intubation. We will specifically exclude those patients thought to be at the highest risk of aspiration (it is considered standard of care to perform cricoid pressure during intubation of this population). We will include those patients with some risk factors for aspiration (it is not considered standard of care to apply cricoid pressure during intubation of this population).

Recent data from large trials of high-frequency high frequency oscillation (HFO) without a cuff leak vs, lung-protective conventional ventialtion (CMV) failed to show any HFO-related benefit with respect to outcome. A possible explanation is that HFO increases the probability of right ventricular dysfunction due to the combination of high mean airway pressures (mPaws) and hypercapnia. In contrast, available preliminary data on low-frequency HFO-tracheal gas insufflation (TGI) with cuff leak vs. CMV are suggestive of an HFO-TGI related benefit. Low-frequency HFO-TGI with a cuff leak is associated with relatively low mean tracheal pressures and adequate control of PaCO2. Thus, the investigators intend to test the hypothesis that low frequency HFO +/- TGI with a cuff leak is associated with better right ventricular function relative to high-frequency HFO without a cuff leak.