Active clinical trials for "Acute Lung Injury"

Currently, there is no proven effective pharmacologic treatment available for patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to be effective in treating several inflammatory diseases. The main purpose of this study is to assess the safety of allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in patients with ARDS.

Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome is high (40 to 60 %). Protective mechanical ventilation, until 2010, was the cornerstone of the ARDS therapeutic strategies. Recently, a prospective multicenter study demonstrates that a 48h continuous infusion of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) have a positive impact on mortality of ARDS patients. (Papazian et al. ACURASYS Study. NEJM 2010; 363:1107-16). The mechanisms through which NMBAs could improve survival remain speculative. They are as follows: reduction of the consumption of oxygen linked to ventilatory workload; increase of chest wall compliance improving mechanical ventilation during ARDS and better adaptation to the protective ventilation strategy; anti-inflammatory effect contributing to a reduction in pulmonary inflammation and improvement in oxygenation, reduction of the variations of transpulmonary pressure (TPP) by the way of better synchronisation between patient and the ventilator. The use of NMBA could also reduce the ventilator induced lung injury by a better control of TPP.

The care of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been significantly improved by learning from experimental and physiological research works and by a series of randomized controlled trials. The mortality of this syndrome remains however high. Numerous experimental and clinical works demonstrated that a ventilatory mode authorizing the patient to make, from the acute phase, spontaneous breathing cycles superimposed on assistance delivered by the ventilator (BIPAP-APRV mode) allowed to improve gas exchanges and hemodynamic tolerance of the ventilation while reducing the need for sedative drugs. This ventilatory mode could also reduce the risk of diaphragmatic dysfunction induced by ventilation. Consequently, our hypothesis is that this ventilatory mode could allow a reduction of mortality in ARDS patients. The aim of this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open study is to compare the effects of two ventilatory strategies on the mortality of ARDS patients and placed under mechanical ventilation.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive ventilation with helmet in reducing endotracheal intubation rates in comparison with Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) facemask among patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

The patients suffered from acute lung ininjury (200<PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300) will be divided into two groups: MSCs-treated group: patients are treated by intravenous injection of hUC-MSCs suspention ; control group: patients were treated with vehicle(Albumin) . The standard Therapies of acute lung injury were the same in both groups. In the following-up days, all the patients were monitored by the same items to evaluate the therapeutic effects.

Mortality of COVID-19 pneumonia with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is extremely high in preliminary reports amounting to 50-60%. Duration of mechanical ventilation in these patients appears to exceed standard duration of mechanical ventilation in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients, suggesting that COVID-19 patients may be particularly at risk for ventilator-induced lung injury. Treatment of COVID-19 ARDS patients is to date mainly supportive with protective mechanical ventilation (ventilation with low tidal volume (VT) i.e. 6 ml/kg of predicted body weight (PBW) and plateau pressure control below 30 cm H2O). Mechanical ventilation with VT reduction below 6 ml/kg PBW in ARDS may reduce alveolar strain, driving pressure and hence ventilator-induced lung injury. Investigators recently performed a multicenter pilot study on 34 moderately severe to severe ARDS patients. This study demonstrated that ultraprotective ventilation with ultra-low VT (≤4.2 ml/kg PBW) without extracorporeal circulation may be applied in approximately 2/3 of the patients, with a 4 cmH2O median reduction in driving pressure, at the price of transient episodes of severe acidosis in approximately 1/3 of the patients. Investigators hypothesized that ultraprotective ventilation without extracorporeal circulation may reduce the mortality at day-90 and increase the number of days free from mechanical ventilation (VFD) at day-60, as compared to protective ventilation.

Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are devastating disorders associated with lung inflammation, low oxygen levels and respiratory failure in children. Prevalence of ALI ranges from 2.2 to 12 per 100,000 children per year. Using these estimates, up to 9,000 children each year will develop ALI/ARDS, which may cause upto 2,000 deaths per year. Currently, there are no specific therapies directed against ARDS/ALI in children. In adult patients, use of steroids early in the course of ARDS appears promising. There are no published clinical trials examining the use of steroids for the treatment of ALI/ARDS in children. Hypothesis: Subjects with ALI/ARDS receiving steroids early in the course of disease (within 72 hours) and longer than 7 days will have improved clinical outcomes as compared to placebo control group as defined by (a) a decreased duration of mechanical ventilation and (b) significantly increased PaO2/FiO2 ratios.

with appropriate inspired oxygen concentrations, NPPV would prevent intubation and hence avert the poor outcome associated with the need of invasive ventilation in patients with ALI/ARDS.

A phase1/2, open label, dose escalation, safety and early efficacy study of CAStem for the treatment of severe COVID-19 associated with or without ARDS.

The purpose of this trial is to determine whether Prone Positioning (PP) improves outcomes for non-intubated hospitalized patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19, who are not candidates for mechanical ventilation in the ICU. The investigators hypothesize that PP will reduce in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice, compared with usual care for non-intubated patients with do-not-intubate goals of care with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to probable COVID-19.