Active clinical trials for "Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury"

Introduction: Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation practices can lead to ventilator-associated lung injury (VILI) and postoperative pulmonary complications in healthy lungs. Mechanical Power has been developed as a new concept in reducing the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications as it takes into account all respiratory mechanics that cause VILI formation. Volume control mode is at the forefront in the old anesthesia devices used in the operating room, and today, together with technology, there are anesthesia devices with many modes and features, as in intensive care units. This causes confusion in the use of mechanical ventilators. In this study, volume and pressure control ventilation modes were compared in terms of respiratory mechanics (including mechanical power) in patients operated in the supine and prone positions. Aim of study: It has been compared the effects on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPH) in terms of VILI risk by calculating mechanical power from advanced respiratory mechanics of patients ventilated in pressure and volume control modes, which are frequently used in operating room applications. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic data, ariscat score, and ariscat risk group values. The supine and prone mechanical power (MPrs) values of the volume control group were statistically significantly lower than the pressure control group. P values were calculated as 0.012 and 0.001, respectively. Results: Supine and prone MPrs values of the volume control group were calculated significantly lower than the pressure control group. Pressure-controlled intraoperative mechanical ventilation is considered to be disadvantageous in terms of the risk of VILI in the supine and prone position in terms of the current mechanical power concept.

Asynchrony during mechanical ventilation has been poorly described in patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome. The purpose of this study is to describe the frequency of asynchronies (ineffective efforts and double triggering) in these group and evaluate potential risk factors and prognosis implications.

The concept of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury Vortex (VILI vortex) has recently been proposed as a progressive lung injury mechanism in which the alveolar stress/strain increases as the ventilable lung "shrinks" (1). This positive feedback inexorably leads to the acceleration of lung damage, with potentially irreversible results. Little is known about the clinical aspects of this condition. Understanding its behavior could contribute to changing its potential devastating impact. The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of VILI vortex in patients with acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19, to establish a connection between this phenomenon and mortality, and to identify the factors that have an impact on its development.

The aim of this questionnaire-based survey is to evaluate the routine use of individual positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and regular alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARM) of Central and Eastern European anaesthesiologists during general anaesthesia.

Intraoperative lung protective ventilatory strategy has been widely recognized to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications in laparotomy and laparoscopic surgeries. However, the clinical evidence and consensus for ventilatory strategy to protect the dependent lung segments during thoracic surgery that requires one-lung ventilation (OLV) is currently not available. Since lung compliance changes significantly during OLV, the levels of respiratory mechanics should be optimized to avoid barotrauma and volutrauma. This study aims to determine the optimal levels of volume-pressure dynamics during OLV and at the phase of recruitment of the independent lungs by achieving optimal lung compliance, gas exchange and hemodynamics.

This study is designed to assess the feasibility of the measurement of local pleural strain at 4 different anatomical sites. The secondary objectives of the study are: To assess intra- and inter-observer variability in the measurement of local pleural strain To identify the strain parameters demonstrating the most clinically relevant and the most significant correlation with a change in tidal volume Hypothesis: The analysis of lung ultrasonographic sequences using speckle-tracking allows the determination of local pleural strain in 4 predetermined pulmonary areas.

Although mechanical ventilation is life saving, it is associated with a number of severe complications collectively referred to as ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). VILI contributes to the high morbidity and mortality associated with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Within the context of a randomized study evaluating the feasibility of conducting a study comparing high frequency oscillation to conventional lung protective ventilation in early severe ARDS, we are evaluating the effect of both ventilator strategies on biological markers of VILI.

Objective to investigate the protective effect of preoperative electroacupuncture on lung function in patients with mechanical ventilation for more than 2 hours under general anesthesia

Assisted ventilation represents, nowadays, the preferred ventilation mode in clinical practice.It has been shown that assisted ventilation modes improve ventilation/perfusion matching, descrease risk of Ventilator induced lung injury and muscle atrophy and have less influence on haemodynamic function. However, PSV (Pressure Support Ventilation) is not free from complications: it may worsen or cause lung injuries by increasing alveolar and intrathoracic negative pressure and by loosing control on Tidal Volume (Vt). Indeed, it has been demonstrated that Vt is the main factor related to VILI. It has been shown that lower Vt and higher PEEP can improve clinical outcome only if associated with a simultaneous reduction in Driving Pressure. Increase in Driving Pressure resulted strongly associated with negative outcomes, especially if higher than 15 cm H2O. PSV is currently the most used assisted ventilation mode. NAVA (Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist) is a ventilation mode in which the diaphragmatic electrical activity (EAdi) is used as a trigger to start a mechanical breath, applying positive pressure during patient's inspiration. Diaphragmatic electrical activity (EAdi) can be detected by a particular nasogastric tube (EAdi catheter). EAdi is the currently available signal closest to the neural breathing centers, which can estimate the patient's respiratory drive, if phrenic nerves are not damaged. It has been demonstrated that NAVA ventilation can reduce the incidence of patient-ventilator asynchronies, because the delivery of the support and the cycling between inspiration and expiration are completely controlled by the patient. However, although PSV and NAVA have been widely compared in many investigations, up to now there are no studies about driving pressure variation during these two modalities of mechanical assisted ventilation. The aim of this study is to measure changes in driving pressure at different levels of ventilatory assistance in PSV and NAVA ventilation modes. Secondary end points are respiratory mechanics indices and patient/ventilator related asynchrony evaluation and comparison.

This study evaluates the effect of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) on lung homogeneity and recruitment in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). It will do this by comparing the homogeneity of ventilation and recruitment prior to a patient being ventilated on APRV, and at 30, 60 and 120 minutes after starting APRV.