Active clinical trials for "Lung Injury"

Introduction: Sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome(SI-ARDS) is a common complication of severe sepsis and is an independent contributor to poor prognosis of patients. It remains a clinical challenge to identify the SI-ARDS early and accurately, which could optimize the treatment strategy and reduce the mortality risk. Radiomics high-dimensional features extracted from CT images offer an insight into microvascular damage of SI-ARDS that are imperceptible to human eyes and aspects of intra-alveolar heterogeneity with potential prognostic relevance. Methods: Study design Investigators screened all patients with sepsis and septic shock who are treated in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University during the period from 1 May 2015 and 30 May 2022. Patients were recruited retrospectively from May 2015 to April 2021 as discovering group, and prospectively during the period from May 2021 to May 2022 as validation group. Follow-up will conducted until April 2023. Cohort descriptions and definitions Investigators plan to recruit 160 patients in discovering group, 40 patients in internal validation group, and 100 patients in external validation group. Patients between 18 and 80 years of age with sepsis and septic shock will be screened for eligibility. SI-ARDS is defined by sequential occurrence of the sepsis-3 consensus criteria for sepsis and the Berlin Definition for ARDS. The exclusion criteria are： admission stay <24hours, the presence of end-stage lung disease or long-term oxygen therapy, critically ill patients who have started mechanical ventilation caused by SI-ARDS before admission, a history of lung transplantation and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer patients not/have received chemotherapy. Outcome measures In this study, the primary outcome measure was the occurrence rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS). It refers to the occurrence of sepsis patients progressed into ARDS. Secondary outcome measures were as follows: 1.28-day mortality 2.ventilator-free days 3.respiratory failure-free days Data collection All clinical data were collected by investigators and trained personnel. Each participant's data will be filled in electronic case report forms (CRF) and store online using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). Discussion: SI-ARDS is one common severe complication with critically ill sepsis patients, which causes high mortality and poor prognosis. Early ARDS patient(arterial oxygen tension/inspired oxygen fraction [PaO2/FIO2] ≤ 300 mmHg but > 200 mmHg) may not require invasive mechanical ventilation, and is more readily reversible than acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS). In this ambispecive cohort study, investigators developed and validated novel nomograms incorporating the radiomics signature and clinical signature to provide an easy-to-use and individualized prediction of SI-ARDS occurrence and severe degree in patients with early stage.

Air is normally pumped in and out of the lungs by the muscles that contribute to inhalation and exhalation, called the respiratory muscles. The abdominal muscles help by forcing air out of your lungs during exhalation; whereas the diaphragm, the main muscle used for breathing, contracts to get air into the lungs during inhalation. With mechanical ventilation, respiratory muscles are able to rest and recover while the breathing machine takes over; however, this may cause respiratory muscle weakness. Patients who develop weakness of these muscles may require more assistance from the ventilator and take longer to recover their ability to breathe without assistance. The impact of this phenomenon on long-term outcomes is uncertain. The RESPIRE study is designed to characterize how respiratory muscles change during mechanical ventilation and to evaluate the impact on long term quality of life. An additional objective of this study is to examine novel measures obtained from automated functions of a ventilator, that may better predict success from weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Oxygen is the most commonly administered therapy in critical illness. Accumulating evidence suggests that patients often achieve supra-physiological levels of oxygenation in the critical care environment. Furthermore, hyperoxia related complications following cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction and stroke have also been reported. The underlying mechanisms of hyperoxia mediated injury remain poorly understood and there are currently no human in vivo studies exploring the relationship between hyperoxia and direct pulmonary injury and inflammation as well as distant organ injury. The current trial is a mechanistic study designed to evaluate the effects of prolonged administration of high-flow oxygen (hyperoxia) on pulmonary and systemic inflammation. The study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy versus matching placebo (synthetic medical air). We will also incorporate a model of acute lung injury induced by inhaled endotoxin (LPS) in healthy human volunteers. Healthy volunteers will undergo bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) at 6 hours post-intervention to enable measurement of pulmonary and systemic markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and cellular injury.

Using Pirfenidone to treat Grade 2 or Grade3 radiation-induced lung injury, and observe the efficacy and safety of the drug.

The study aims to assess the potential benefit and evaluate the safety and tolerability of a single subcutaneous (SC) dose of VIB7734 in hospitalized patients with documented infection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) with pulmonary involvement. Subjects will be administered a single dose of VIB7734 injected under the skin, assessed for efficacy for 28 days and followed for an additional 42 days.

The main objective of this randomized multicenter clinical trial is to test the hypothesis that further reduction of VT to 4mL/kg may enhance lung protection in patients with ARDS as compared to the conventional "ARDS-Net" ventilation. Control of PaCO2 in the ~4 ml/kg arm would be accomplished by LFPPV- ECCO2-R.

Acute lung injury (ALI) and the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) represent a spectrum of clinical syndromes of rapid respiratory system deterioration that are associated with both pulmonary and systemic illness. These syndromes are associated with 30-40% mortality with our current standard of care and are responsible for approximately 75,000 deaths in the US yearly. Current evidence-based care of ALI consists of a strategy of mechanical ventilation utilizing low lung volumes (ARDSNet ventilation) intended to limit further stretch-induced lung injury exacerbated by the ventilator. However, this strategy has been shown to be associated with increased lung injury in a subset of patients and still is associated with about a 30% mortality rate. Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a different, non-experimental strategy of mechanical ventilation currently in routine clinical use. APRV is a pressure-cycled ventilator mode that allows a patient a greater degree of autonomy in controlling his or her breathing pattern than ARDSNet ventilation. Use of APRV has been associated with better oxygenation, less sedative usage, and less ventilator-associated pneumonia in small studies compared with other ventilator modes. However, debate exists over whether APRV might result in decreased or increased ventilator-associated lung injury when compared with ARDSNet ventilation. We intend to implement a randomized, cross over study looking at biomarkers of lung injury in patients with acute lung injury during ventilation with APRV and using the ARDSNet protocol. Our hypothesis is that airway pressure release ventilation is associated with lower levels of lung injury biomarkers than ARDSNet ventilation.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute lung injury (ALI) are medical conditions that occur when there is severe inflammation and increased fluids in both lungs, making it difficult for the lungs to function properly. Hospital treatment for a person with ALI/ARDS often includes the use of a breathing machine, or ventilator, until the person is able to breathe without assistance. Initiating proper nutrition through a feeding tube early in a person's hospital stay may help to improve recovery, but the optimal timing, composition, and amount of feeding treatments are unknown. This study will evaluate whether early or delayed full-calorie feeding through a feeding tube is more effective in reducing recovery time and increasing survival rates in people with ALI/ARDS. The study will also determine whether supplementing the feedings with omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants benefits people with ALI/ARDS.

Nitric oxide (NO) plays a pivotal role in maintenance of normal vascular tone. However, in sepsis the excessive production of NO results in myocardial depression, vasoplegia, and cytotoxic effects, thus promoting shock and multiple organ dysfunction. A recently completed study from our group showed advantageous cardiovascular effects of continuously infused methylene blue (MB), an inhibitor of NO pathway, in human septic shock. In another investigation, we have found that the combination of inhaled NO and continuously infused MB attenuates endotoxin-induced acute lung injury (ALI) in sheep. Our intention is, in a new study, to test the hypothesis that the combination of MB and NO (MB+NO) improves both cardiovascular and pulmonary functions as well as clinical outcome in patients with septic shock and ALI. Forty mechanically ventilated patients diagnosed with hyperdynamic septic shock and ALI, will be randomized to groups receiving Conventional treatment (control group)(n =10); MB infusion in addition to conventional treatment (n=10); Inhaled NO in addition to conventional treatment (n=10); MB infusion combined with inhaled NO (MB+NO) in addition to conventional treatment (n=10).

This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ravulizumab administered in adult participants with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severe pneumonia, acute lung injury, or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Participants were randomly assigned to receive ravulizumab in addition to best supportive care (BSC) (2/3 of the participants) or BSC alone (1/3 of the participants). BSC consisted of medical treatment and/or medical interventions per routine hospital practice.