Lymphedema Prevention in Breast Cancer
BREAST CANCERLYMPHEDEMAOBJECTIVE: To find out the effectiveness of early application of physical therapy in the prevention of lymphedema after breast surgery and lymphadenectomy. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled and single blinded clinical trial. Three years duration. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of these groups: Experimental group: Early physical therapy + training in means of prevention; Control group: just training in means of prevention. In both groups several physical therapy assessments will be undertaken: 1st before surgery; 2nd immediately after surgery; 3rd after completing intervention; 4th, 5th and 6th after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. SUBJECTS: Women with breast cancer treated with breast surgery including lymphadenectomy in Principe de Asturias Hospital, provided that there is no contraindication for physical therapy, and after reading, understanding and freely signing an informed consent form. SAMPLE SIZE: A total of 116 subjects will be included in the study (58 subjects in each group), assuming a 15% of drop-outs and at least 20% reduction, with a statistical power of 60%. DATA ANALYSIS: To find out the effectiveness of intervention we will compare the rate of lymphedema in both groups by means of a logistic regression analysis, in which the main factor is the intervention group. Other factors aimed to control the effect of the intervention will also be included. In order to compare the rate of appearance of lymphedema in both groups, a survival analysis will also be included.
Microvascular Breast Reconstruction With Lymph Node Transfer
LymphedemaLymphedema of Upper Arm1 morethis study aims to evaluate the outcomes of simultaneous free abdominal flap & vascularized lymph node transfer for both breast reconstruction and postmastectomy lymphedema
Health Belief Model Based Nursing Interventions on Lymphedema Prevention
Breast CancerBreast Cancer Lymphedema1 moreAim: The study was performed to examine effects of Health Belief Model based nursing interventions given at home visits on prevention of lymphedema in women having breast surgery. Methods: The study had an experimental design. 72 women receiving radiotherapy after breast surgery, of whom 37 formed the intervention group and 35 formed the control group. The study had an experimental design. Data were collected with a personal information questionnaire, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (Q-DASH), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life for Breast Cancer 23 (EORTC QLQ-BR23), Strategies Used by Patients to Promote Health (SUPPH), Arm Circumference Form at three home visits at three-month intervals. Hypotheses of the study Extremity function restrictions will be lower in the intervention group than in the control group. Self-efficacy levels will be higher in the intervention group than in the control group. Functions improving the quality of life will be higher in the intervention group than in the control group. There will be fewer symptoms reducing the quality of life in the intervention group than in the control group. The incidence of lymphedema will be lower in the intervention group than in the control group. The mean cost of the intervention group at home visits, will be lower than in the control group. What does this paper contribute? Nurses can play an effective role in enabling women undergoing breast surgery to acquire behavior of lymphedema prevention. This may reduce treatment costs. Future research should evaluate collaborative models of care in general practice aimed at improving lymphedema prevention for women undergoing breast surgery. Policymakers should consider introducing funding measures for breast cancer survivors by nurses.
Complete Decongestive Therapy in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
Lymphedema of Upper LimbThe purpose of this study is to investigate which number of lymphedema therapy treatments/week best reduces upper extremity swelling, increased arm function, and reduces the most lymphedema symptoms.
Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Computed Tomography Lymphoscintigraphy, and Intensity-Modulated...
Breast CancerLymphedemaRATIONALE: Diagnostic procedures, such as single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography lymphoscintigraphy, may help lower the dose of radiation therapy after surgery, and help prevent lymphedema. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography lymphoscintigraphy followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy to see how well they work in treating patients who have undergone surgery for stage I or stage II breast cancer.
Lymphedema Prophylaxis in Breast Cancer Survivors Who Show Early Evidence of High-risk Status
LymphedemaBreast CancerTo compare the effectiveness of usual treatments for lymphedema [massage and elastic compression sleeve, instituted at-risk and before the development of swelling (lymphedema)], compared to the use of a newly-marketed device, the Flexitouch, which electronically simulates the effect of massage upon lymph flow.
Effectiveness of Two Exercises in Preventing Lower-Limb Lymphedema After Gynecological Cancer Surgery...
Lymphedema of LegGynecologic Cancer1 moreBackground: Lower-limb lymphedema is one of the complications after gynecological cancer surgery. Patients with lymphedema are more likely to limit their daily life activities and become inactive, leading to negative influences on quality of life. Although studies on resistance exercise primarily focus on the upper limb, there scarce evidence of the application of this exercise to the lower limb has been reported. Objective: This study will aim to compare the effect of resistance and non-resistance exercises in the prevention of lower-limb lymphedema, increasing self-management, and improving the quality of life of the patients following gynecological cancer surgery. Design: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Settings and participants: Sixty patients with gynecological cancer will recruit from a gynecological ward and will be randomly assigned to the elastic-band resistance exercise group (experimental group, n = 30) or conventional non-resistance exercise group (control group, n = 30). Methods: Both groups will receive one-to-one training about upper and lower limb exercises within 1 week after surgery. Each exercise will consist of a 5-minute warm-up session, a 20-minute main session, and a relaxing session. Patients in the experimental group will use an elastic band and change the elastic band from low to medium resistance. Patients in the experimental and control groups will receive guidelines from a booklet and video about elastic-band resistance and conventional non-resistance exercise, respectively. All patients will be evaluated at three-time points: T0-within 1 week after surgery and before the intervention, T1-10-11 weeks after surgery and within 1 week after intervention, T2-3 months after intervention using Lymph-ICF-LL scale, EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, limb circumference measurements, and lymph self-management questionnaire. The Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, the Mann-Whitney U-test, and the Generalized Estimating Equations will be used for the statistical analysis of the data. Anticipated Outcomes: Findings from this study could provide a reference for home-based resistance exercise guidelines and be integrated into the care of activities for women following gynecological surgery with lower-limb lymphoedema.
Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT) for Treatment of Head and Neck Lymphedema
LymphedemaOropharyngeal Cancer2 moreObjectives: Specific Aim 1: Estimate the prevalence of head and neck lymphedema in patients who have been treated with surgery and/or radiation therapy (± chemotherapy) for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer. Compare functional outcomes in patients with and without lymphedema using cross-sectional survey methods. Specific Aim 2: Evaluate the effect of Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT) provided in an outpatient setting or a home-based program in reducing lymphedema in patients previously treated with surgery and/or radiation therapy (± chemotherapy) for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer at 1, 3 and 6 months follow-up. Patient characteristics, treatment variables, and the health care environment will be analyzed as possible explanatory variables that influence the effect of lymphedema treatment. Specific Aim 3: Evaluate the effect of lymphedema treatment on symptom burden, self-image, and functional performance status in patients previously treated with surgery and/or radiation therapy (± chemotherapy) for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer.
Lymphedema Prevention in Breast Cancer
Breast CancerLymphedemaOBJECTIVE: To find out the effectiveness of early application of Manual Lymph Drainage in the prevention of upper limb lymphedema after breast surgery and axillary lymphadenectomy in women with breast cancer. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled and single blinded clinical trial. Five years duration. Patients were randomly assigned to one of these groups: Experimental group: Manual Lymph Drainage + training in means of prevention; Control group: just training in means of prevention. In both groups several physical therapy assessments were undertaken: 1st before surgery; 2nd 3 month after surgery; 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th after 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. SUBJECTS: Women with breast cancer treated with breast surgery including axillary lymphadenectomy in Provincial Hospital of Toledo, provided that there is no contraindication for manual lymph drainage, and after reading, understanding and freely signing an informed consent form. SAMPLE SIZE: A total of 150 subjects were included in the study (57 subjects in experimental group and 93 in control group), assuming a 20% of drop-outs and at least 25% reduction, with a statistical power of 75%. DATA ANALYSIS: To find out the effectiveness of intervention the investigators will compare the rate of lymphedema in both groups by means of a logistic regression analysis, in which the main factor is the intervention group. Other factors aimed to control the effect of the intervention will also be included. In order to compare the rate of appearance of lymphedema in both groups, a survival analysis will also be included.
Diagnostic Contribution of Ultrasonography in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
Lymphedema of Upper ArmBreast cancer is the most common cancer in women. It is an important health problem that has been increasingly encountered in recent years. With advances in treatment, the survival time after breast cancer is prolonged, and as a result, many women face certain diseases during this period. One of these diseases, breast cancer-related lymphedema, is characterized by abnormal accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial tissue, which can occur at any time after breast cancer surgery or radiotherapy and is a major cause of morbidity.Early and accurate diagnosis of lymphedema is very important for effective treatment. In routine clinical practice there are various methods used to diagnose lymphedema such as history, physical examination and limb circumference. Circumferential measurement is based on the principle of circumference measurement at certain intervals (such as 4 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm) from certain anatomical reference points on the extremities. Volume calculation can also be made from a data obtained from circumferential measurements via a computer program. Circumferential and volume measurements are used in the diagnosis, severity of lymphedema and follow-up of treatment. Although it is the most commonly used method in practice, circumferential measurements and volume measurements alone can ignore changes in tissue structure and significant changes in the presence of latent lymphedema. At the same time, circumferential measurements are made at regular intervals and the difference between the healthy side and 2 cm or more is considered as lymphedema, which may neglect tissue and edema changes in areas not in the measuring area. Ultrasonography, which has been used in the measurement and evaluation of lymphedema in recent years, is a noninvasive economic method. Skin and subcutaneous distance in lymphedema can be measured by ultrasonography, and changes in tissue structure, fibrous tissue, adipose tissue and muscle tissue can be demonstrated. Fibrotic changes in lymphedema tissue play a key role in progression. Subcutaneous ultrasound echogenicity (SEG), which is thought to be a measure of lymphedema severity in extremities, was determined as stages 0, 1 and 2. According to this; Stage 0: No increase in echogenicity in the subcutaneous layer. That is, the subcutaneous fat layer is observed as black. Stage 1: Diffuse increase in echogenicity, but identifiable horizontal or oblique-focused echogenic lines caused by bundles of connective tissue may be seen. In this study, the investigators aimed to determine the correlation between circumferential measurements and skin and subcutaneous tissue ultrasonography in breast cancer-related lymphedema patients.The primer aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between circumferential measurements and ultrasonographic measurements in breast cancer-related lymphedema. The secondary aim is to investigate the relationship among the changes in subcutaneous tissue structure (subcutaneous ultrasound echogenicity degree-SEG) and lymphedema severity in breast cancer-related lymphedema.