Active clinical trials for "Lymphoproliferative Disorders"

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) differ clinically from lymphoma in the general (immunocompetent) population due to their higher incidence and their frequent association with Epstein-Barr virus. Previous clinical trials have shown their remarkably good response to rituximab as well as to chemotherapy. The PTLD-1 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of sequential immunochemotherapy with 4 courses of rituximab IV followed by 4 cycles of CHOP chemotherapy. Compared to trials of rituximab monotherapy in PTLD, median overall survival was extended from 2.4 to 6.5 years. Compared to previous trials of chemotherapy, complications were reduced. In addition, we noted that those patients who already had a good response to the first four cycles of rituximab did better overall than those who did not. As a consequence, the PTLD-1/3 trial introduced risk-stratification in sequential treatment according to the response to the first 4 courses of rituximab monotherapy. Those patients with a complete remission went on to receive four further courses of rituximab whereas those who did not received rituximab and CHOP chemotherapy. Interim results have demonstrated that it is safe to restrict chemotherapy treatment in this manner and thus established the concept of treatment stratification based on the response to rituximab. The PTLD-2 trial is the next step in the development of this strategy. Compared to the PTLD-1/3 trial, the key difference is the use of subcutaneous instead of intravenous rituximab application. Interim results from an ongoing trial of patients with follicular lymphoma (NCT01200758) have shown that subcutaneous administration results in increased blood levels and in non-inferior remission rates. Furthermore, the stratification strategy is refined based on observations from the previous PTLD-1 and PTLD1/3 trials: Risk groups are now defined not only based on response to rituximab therapy but also on the international prognostic index (IPI, a well-established lymphoma risk score) and the transplanted organ. The major advantage of this new stratification is an extended low-risk group that is eligible for subcutaneous rituximab monotherapy: Patients with a low risk of disease progression, defined as those who achieve a complete remission after the first four courses of subcutaneous rituximab monotherapy and those with an IPI of 0 to 2 who achieve a partial remission at interim staging, will go on with rituximab monotherapy. Patients with high IPI who achieve a partial remission, patients with stable disease at interim staging and non-thoracic transplant recipients with progressive disease at interim staging will be considered high risk. These patients will go on with 4 cycles of rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy similar to the PTLD-1/3 protocol. Thoracic transplant recipients refractory to rituximab will be considered very high risk and will go on with rituximab subcutaneous plus alternating chemotherapy with CHOP and DHAOx. The trial hypothesis is that the new protocol will improve the event-free survival, a measure integrating unfavorable events such as death, disease progression and treatment complications, particularly infections, in the low risk-group compared to the results of the PTLD-1 trial. In very high-risk patients data from the PTLD-1 and PTLD-1/3 trial have shown that the current treatment is not sufficient to control the disease. Death due to disease progression was observed in more than 80% of patients. Here, rituximab combined with alternating chemotherapy cycles of CHOP and DHAOx (+GCSF) may increase treatment efficacy with an acceptable toxicity profile. In summary, the PTLD-2 trials tests if the substitution of subcutaneous for intravenous rituximab and an updated stratification strategy that deescalates treatment for those at low risk and escalates treatment for those at very high risk can further improve the overall efficacy and safety of PTLD therapy.

This is a Phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) partially-matched third-party allogeneic Epstein-Barr virus cytotoxic T lymphocytes (EBV-CTLs) for the treatment of EBV-induced lymphomas and EBV-associated malignancies.

This phase I clinical trial is studying the side effects and the best dose of lenalidomide after donor bone marrow transplant in treating patients with high-risk hematologic cancer. Biological therapies, such as lenalidomide, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing.

This phase I trial is studying the side effects, best way to give, and best dose of Akt inhibitor MK2206 (MK2206) in treating patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumors or leukemia. MK2206 may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.

RATIONALE: Imetelstat sodium may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. PURPOSE: This phase I clinical trial is studying the side effects and best dose of imetelstat sodium in treating young patients with refractory or recurrent solid tumors or lymphoma.

RATIONALE: Giving high doses of chemotherapy drugs, such as busulfan and cyclophosphamide, before a donor bone marrow transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. When the healthy stem cells from a donor are infused into the patient they may help the patient's bone marrow make stem cells, red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving cyclosporine, methylprednisolone, and methotrexate after transplant may stop this from happening. PURPOSE: This clinical trial studies high-dose busulfan and high-dose cyclophosphamide followed by donor bone marrow transplant in treating patients with leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, multiple myeloma, or recurrent Hodgkin or Non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

RATIONALE: Giving an infusion of natural killer cells from a donor after a donor stem cell transplant may help kill any remaining cancer cells after the transplant. PURPOSE: This phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best dose of donor natural killer cells when given after a donor stem cell transplant in treating patients with advanced cancer.

This study uses a new investigational (not yet approved by the FDA for widespread use) drug called ZIO-101, an organic arsenical. You must be diagnosed to have relapsed/refractory leukemia or lymphoma (blood cancer) and have tried other standard therapies. This study is designed to determine whether ZIO-101 may be given safely. The study will also test whether ZIO-101 helps to treat blood cancer. We anticipate that approximately 22 to 35 patients will take part in this study. Arsenic has been used as a medicinal agent for centuries in many different cultures. Most recently in the United States, an inorganic arsenic compound was approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). However, use of inorganic arsenic is limited by a narrow range of activity and systemic toxicity, most notably of the cardiac system. ZIO-101 is an organic arsenic derivative. In vitro testing in both the National Cancer Institute (NCI) cancer cell panel and in vivo testing in a leukemia animal model demonstrated substantial activity of SGLU against hematologic cancers. In vitro testing of SGLU using the NCI human cancer cell panel also detected activity against lung, colon and brain cancers, melanoma, and ovary and kidney cancers. Moderate activity was seen against breast and prostate cancers cells. Data suggest that organic arsenic generates reactive oxygen species in the cells to induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest.

This phase I trial is studying the side effects and best dose of PXD101 and bortezomib in treating patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas. PXD101 and bortezomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. PXD101 may also cause cancer cells to look more like normal cells, and to grow and spread more slowly. Giving PXD101 together with bortezomib may kill more cancer cells.

Subjects are being asked to participate in this study because treatment of their disease requires them to receive a stem cell transplant. Stem cells or "mother" cells are the source of normal blood cells and lead to recovery of blood counts after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Unfortunately, there is not a perfectly matched stem cell donor (like a sister or brother) and the subject's disease is considered rapidly progressive and does not permit enough time to identify another donor (like someone from a registry list that is not their relative). We have, however, identified a close relative of the subject's whose stem cells are not a perfect match, but can be used. However, with this type of donor, there is typically an increased risk of developing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a high rate of transplant failure, and a longer delay in the recovery of the immune system. GVHD is a serious and sometimes fatal side effect of stem cell transplant. GVHD occurs when the new donor cells (graft) recognizes that the body tissues of the patient (host) are different from those of the donor. When this happens, cells in the graft may attack the host organs, primarily the skin, liver, and intestines. The number of occurrences and harshness of severe GVHD depends on several factors, including the degree of genetic differences between the donor and recipient, the intensity of the pre-treatment conditioning regimen, the quantity of transplanted cells, and the recipient's age. In recipients of mismatched family member or matched unrelated donor stem cell transplants, there is a greater risk of GVHD so that 70-90% of recipients of unchanged marrow will develop severe GVHD which could include symptoms such as marked diarrhea, liver failure, or even death. In an effort to lower the occurrences and severity of graft-versus-host disease in patients and to lower the rate of transplant failure, we would like to specially treat the donor's blood cells to remove cells that are most likely to attack the patient's tissues. This will occur in combination with intense conditioning treatment that the patient will receive before the transplant.