Active clinical trials for "Macrophage Activation Syndrome"

The pathophysiology of macrophage activation syndrome has been mainly studied in pediatric genetic primary forms. There is little data in secondary forms related to bacterial sepsis. Because of the seriousness of this entity (43% of deaths in intensive care in the largest cohort published so far by the medical resuscitation team of Rouen University Hospital), it is necessary to better understand the physiopathological mechanisms to be able to propose a suitable therapy. For now, the management of this syndrome is far from consensual. Some authors advocate a single etiological treatment, while others suggest the need for intensive management of anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive type. The fragility of resuscitation patients does not allow intensive immunosuppressive therapies as proposed by some authors. In the era of immunotherapy, the precise knowledge of physiopathological data would make it possible to propose a targeted therapy with little risk of adverse effects. Recent work has indeed shown excellent tolerance of immunotherapy during sepsis and could be applied eventually in patients with macrophage activation syndrome.

Retrospective analysis of ferritin, outcome and HLH-criteria in critically ill patients.

Macrophage activation syndrome(MAS) is a complication of bone marrow suppression, coagulopathy and CNS dysfunction which occurs in rheumatic diseases. Normally the (Hemophagocytic Lympho-Histiocytosis) HLH-2004 criteria is used to diagnose patients with MAS. However this criteria is probably not sensitive and would probably be fulfilled quite late into the disease. Thus there would be an unacceptable delay. Ravelli et al came up with a different set of criteria based on data of patients reported in literature. Systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SoJIA) is the most common cause of MAS. MAS in other rheumatic illnesses occurs in the setting on unbridled inflammation. In both SoJIA and uncontrolled rheumatic disease the patient is liable to have high WBC counts and high platelet counts. Bone marrow suppression which is one of the pathognomic features of MAS would be picked up very late if absolute cut off values were utilized. Kelly et al used the same arguments in their review to suggest that in MAS/Reactive hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis(ReHLH), the trend of change in laboratory parameters would be more useful than absolute cut offs. Hence the investigators propose new candidate criteria which are based on trends of laboratory parameters and seek to determine their utility in comparison to absolute cut offs of HLH or Ravelli criteria. The investigators also wanted to determine that among the Ravelli criteria and HLH-2004 criteria, which were fulfilled earlier in patients diagnosed as having MAS. Study hypothesis:-Criteria which measure serial trend of laboratory parameters would be fulfilled earlier than absolute cut offs when diagnosing MAS in patients with rheumatic illness.