Active clinical trials for "Macular Edema"

This study evaluates long-term safety in patients with macular edema due to Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO) originally enrolled in the BRAVO & CRUISE trials and subsequently followed in the HORIZON extension trial.

This is a two-part study. The first part (Stratum I) is an open-label, dose escalation, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic study, where active study drug (PF-04523655) will be given to all patients who participate. Stratum I will determine the maximum tolerated dose and any dose-limiting toxicities. The second part (Stratum II) is a prospectively randomized, multi-center, double-masked, dose ranging study evaluating the efficacy and safety of PF-04523655 alone and in combination with ranibizumab versus ranibizumab alone in patients with DME.

This study is designed to confirm that the investigational drug Ranibizumab given by injection into the eye is safe and effective to use in people with diabetic macular edema (DME).

The objective of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of minocycline as a microglia inhibitor in individuals with diabetic macular edema (DME).

to evaluate the efficacy of a single intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection, 0.1mL (2.5mg), against panretinal photocoagulation (PRP)-induced macular thickening and visual disturbance in patients with severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and good vision

Macular edema is the main cause of vision loss in diabetic patients. Its treatment is mainly based on laser photocoagulation, but has limited results. Alternative treatment are under investigation, such as vitrectomy and intravitreal injections of triamcinolone .The aim of VITRILASE is to compare the efficacy of these two treatments to laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema.

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of an ocular sirolimus (rapamycin) formulation at various doses in patients with diabetic macular edema.

Uveitic Cystoid Macular Edema (CME) is a major cause of visual loss associated with uveitis. Systemic and/or local corticosteroid therapy and systemic immunosuppression with steroid-sparing agents such as cyclosporine, methotrexate, azathioprine, or others, effectively treats uveitis and associated CME in many patients. However, in many cases, CME persists in spite of adequate suppression of uveitis. No consensus exists on how best to treat such cases. The further addition of immunosuppressive agents appears to have little effect on this form of CME. Oral corticosteroids are useful, but high dosage and prolonged use can be associated with serious side-effects. Periocular and intravitreal corticosteroid injections are associated with well-known, significant side effects such as glaucoma and cataract formation. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is suspected to play a role in the loss of vascular integrity in the eye and known to be induced by inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6, which are elevated intraocularly in uveitis. In addition, it has been demonstrated that aqueous VEGF concentrations are statistically significantly higher in those uveitis patients with CME than those without CME. Inhibition of inappropriate VEGF activity is a potential approach to treatment of CME in uveitis given our current knowledge of the pathophysiology of this condition and also because of the clinical need for additional treatment options for these patients. Ranibizumab, a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody antigen-binding fragment (Fab) that neutralizes all active forms of VEGF-A, would target this pathway and may be useful in cases of persistent CME in uveitis patients. The objective of this study is to determine if an anti-VEGF agent, Lucentis, is safe and effective in leading to regression of macular edema due to chronic non-infectious uveitis in patients with well-controlled uveitis.

A prospective multicenter study comparing patients with CRVO amd secondary macular edema treated with ranibizumab versus sham. Safety and efficacy will be evaluated. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two arms. 32 patients, 6 months follow up. There will be monthly visits with injection the first three months and subsequently new injection if present edema.

The purpose of the study is to test whether Macugen injected into the eye improves vision in more patients than the currently existing standard of care laser therapy. The safety of Macugen compared to standard of care laser will also be evaluated.