Active clinical trials for "Macular Edema"

Purpose: To evaluate the role of adjuvent micropulse laser with Aflibercept injections in the management of treatment naïve centre involving DME, looking at decreased treatment burden and increased efficacy as outcomes. Methods: This was a prospective, single centre, randomized trial that included 40 eyes (40 patients) with previously untreated centre involved DME. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Aflibercept plus micropulse laser (group A) or Aflibercept monotherapy (group B).

To compare the efficacy and comfort of two FDA approved pre-injection antiseptics when used for intravitreal injections.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a sign of diabetic retinopathy that affects central vision. It is also a leading cause of visual decline in younger patients, especially in developing countries like our Arab community. Intra-vitrreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (AVEGF) in management of DME had significant improvement in the final logMAR Un-corrected Distant Visual Acuity ( UCDVA) and logMAR Best Corrected Distant Visual Acuity (BCDVA), as well as reduction in the central retinal thickness from baseline measurement.

Purpose: To evaluate the short-term effect of adding topical ketorolac to the management of diabetic macular edema (DME) with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB). Setting: Ophthalmology department of Imam Hossein and Torfe Medical Centers. Ophthalmic Epidemiology Research Center of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Methods: In a randomized double-masked placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial, all eyes with DME with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 20/40 and 20/400 were included. They should have had at least one intravitreal anti-VEGF injection in the past 2 months. They were randomized into two groups. Both groups received two IVB injections with 6-week interval. One group received topical ketorolac every 6 hour in the first interval and then artificial tear every 6 hour as a placebo in the second interval. The other group received the opposite medications. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) evaluations were repeated at the termination of each treatment period i.e. at 6 and 12 weeks. The main outcome measure was BCVA changes in logMAR and the second outcome was CMT changes. The interim analysis of this study is presented in this report.

Randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of photobiomodulation compared with sham on central subfield thickness (CST) in eyes with central-involved DME and good vision.

This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of AR-1105 (dexamethasone implant) for the treatment of macular edema (ME) due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). A more durable intravitreal implant containing a low dose of dexamethasone may result in less frequent retreatments, and potentially lower the incidence of steroid-related side effects without compromising efficacy.

This study is an open-label, dose-escalating, 48-week study assessing the safety, tolerability, bioactivity and duration of action of a single intravitreal injection of 0.1 mg, 0.25 mg, or 0.5 mg AXT107 in approximately 18 subjects (up to 6 subjects per dose) with Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is considered the second vascular disorder of the retina after diabetic retinopathy. Patients with RVO are at risk of the development of macular edema. Different treatment modalities for macular edema include LASER therapy, antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and triamcinolone. Aim To detect the efficacy of formulated Triamcinolone Acetonide(TA) injection in the posterior subtenon space to manage macular edema secondary to non-ischemic RVOs, either central or branch.

This Phase 3 study will evaluate the efficacy, durability, and safety of KSI-301 compared to aflibercept, in participants with macular edema due to treatment-naïve branch (BRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

This was an open-label, multi-center, FIH study with a single ascending dose (SAD) design that assessed the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single IVT dose of MHU650 in up to 24 participants with macular edema.