Active clinical trials for "Macular Edema"

The purpose is to show the 3-month efficacy and safety in diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal ziv-aflibercept.

The Macular Edema Ranibizumab v. Intravitreal anti-inflammatory Therapy (MERIT) Trial will compare the relative efficacy and safety of intravitreal methotrexate, intravitreal ranibizumab, and the intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of uveitic macular edema persisting or reoccurring after an intravitreal corticosteroid injection. MERIT is a parallel design (1:1:1), randomized comparative trial with an anniversary close-out after 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome is percent change in central subfield thickness from the baseline OCT measurement to the 12 week visit.

This was a prospective, single center, open label, randomized study evaluating the biological effect of squalamine lactate ophthalmic solution, 0.2% combined with intravitreous ranibizumab in patients with macular edema secondary to branch, hemi-central and central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO, HRVO, CRVO).

Treatment of diabetic macular edema with intravitreal aflibercept in subjects previously treated with intravitreal anti-Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents (ranibizumab or bevacizumab)

Corticosteroids, whether injected peri- or intra-ocularly, remain indispensable tools of the therapeutic arsenal in treating inflammatory macular edema. However, a few years ago, only triamcinolone acetonide was available to ophthalmologists. This molecule, developed initially for rheumatological or dermatological use, has been increasingly deployed in ophthalmology, while still off-label. In 2011, the delivery system of dexamethasone from biodegradable and injectable implant into the vitreous cavity obtained the label for inflammatory macular edema. This protocol is therefore designed to compare the efficacy and safety of peri- and intra-ocular injections of corticosteroids in the treatment of inflammatory macular edema.

The Endurance Trial is a Phase IV open label clinical study to assess the need for ongoing intravitreal aflibercept injections after the 3-year VISTA DME (VGFT-OD-1009) endpoint. Subjects will be treated with intravitreal aflibercept injections pro re nata (PRN) based on the presence of CR-DME (Clinically Relevant-DME). In addition, subjects who meet re-treatment criteria will be eligible for focal laser treatment every 90 days

Diabetic macular edema refers to swelling (fluid accumulation) in the center of the retina. The retina is like the film of a camera and is located in the back of the eye. This condition can develop in diabetics where swelling results from leaking of fluid from the blood vessels of the eye, into the center of the retina, the macula. If left untreated, this can affect central vision. The current standard treatment for diabetic macular edema includes medications injected directly into the eye (intravitreal injections) and laser eye treatment. The drugs that are injected directly into the eye are known as anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF) agents which help to reduce the leaking. However, response in patients to these anti-VEGF drugs can vary and examination of predictive factors is required. This particular study examines cellular factors called cytokines in patients receiving aflibercept, a type of anti-VEGF drug, in the hopes of detecting changes in cytokines that can predict treatment response amongst groups of patients.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of visual loss in patients with diabetes mellitus. The standard treatment is with focal/grid laser therapy. Topical nepafenac was used as an adjunct therapy for treatment of DME. The aim of this study is to compare the difference of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) at 3 months post treatment between combination therapy of laser and topical nepafenac and laser monotherapy in patients with DME.

Laser photocoagulation and intravitreal anti-vascular growth factor injections are commonly used treatment options for individuals with diabetic macular edema. However, some patients continue to experience persistent diabetic macular edema and poor vision despite continued laser and/or anti-vegf therapy. Recent clinical trials suggest that due to inflammatory mediators dexamethasone intravitreal implant (0.7mg) may be a good alternative therapy for individuals unresponsive to laser photocoagulation or intravitreal anti-vascular growth factor injections. The purpose of this research study is to compare the effectiveness of using a dexamethasone steroid implant versus monthly intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for research participants with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME).

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) shows a sustained functional and morphologic response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs, but the optimal approach for persistent macular edema still in debate. Purpose: To evaluate 24-week visual and anatomical effects of intravitreal bevacizumabe or triamcinolone in patients who have residual edema after 24-weeks to "pro re nata"(prn) intravitreal bevacizumabe therapy. Methods: This study will enroll a total of 100 DME eyes. Each patient will receive "prn" bevacizumabe therapy throughout 24 weeks. At week 24, patients who have recurrent or persistent edema were randomized 1:1 to Group 1 (prn bevacizumane) or Group 2 (prn triamcinolone). Patients with no recurrent or persistent edema at week 24 will comprise to Group 3 and continue receive prn bevacizumabe. Prn treatment was administered when central subfield thickness of the macula (CST) > 300 µm and/or there are intraretinal cystoid spaces in the fovea. Study visits will occur every 4 weeks with the endpoint at week 48. At each visit, patients will have an eye exam and CST, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were assessed. Fundus photography and fluorescein angiography will also perform at baseline, week 16, week 40, and week 48. All patients will resume standard care after exiting.