Active clinical trials for "Macular Edema"

The aim of this study is to evaluate the visual outcome and prognostic factors after intraocular injections of Ranibizumab or combination of Ranibizumab And Dexamethasone under pro re nata treatment regimen for Diabetic Macular Edema patients.

The Investigators propose to examine the effect of lowering the intraocular pressure on macular edema in Participants diagnosed with diabetic macular edema. Our theory is based on the assumption that lower intraocular pressure means higher Ocular Perfusion pressure, which may cause an improvement in retinal perfusion and thus an improvement in retinal oxygenation and reduced edema

Diffuse Macular Edema is the main cause of visual disorders in diabetic patients. Diclofenac is a cheap drug available in most of treatment centers.in animal studies the safe dosage is identified that can be used in diffuse diabetic macular edema for treatment. in this study, we are going to compare the effect of intra vitreal injection of Diclofenac and Bevacizumab in primary treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety end efficacy of combined phakoemulsification and vitrectomy with retinal endophotocoagulation and intraoperative use of bevacizumab in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME), to determine the possible preoperative and intraoperative factors that might influence surgical outcomes.

Nutritional supplements have an augmentative effect on the outcomes of standard treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (NAMD).

Diabetic maculopathy is the leading cause of visual impairment in the working-age population in developed countries. Diabetic macular edema can cause impaired visual acuity and so far is treated by laser, vitreous surgery, and intravitreal cortisone application. Still 50% of the cases do not respond to the treatment. Recently intraocular anti-VEGF-treatment with ranibizumab (Lucentis®, Novartis) in diabetic macular edema has proven efficacy to last over a period of 3 to 6 months. Still, the optimal dosage for those intravitreal injections still has to be found, because frequent injections are necessary. The measurement of visual acuity is inadequate to quantify in detail the visual impairment. Using the newest technology of a high-definition optical coherence tomography (Cirrus-OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc.) to determine the retinal thickness, and a miroperimetry (MP-1, Nidek Technologies) to determine retinal sensitivity, we hope to find the optimal dosage of intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular edema. Study objective: To determine the dose response of 0.5mg and 1.0mg ranibizumab (Lucentis®, Novartis Pharma) intravitreal injection in subjects with resistant diabetic macular edema and evaluate safety and tolerability.

Treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion is more effective with combined therapy of bevacizumab and triamcinolone than bevacizumab alone.

Intravitreal Bevacizumab is an effective treatment for the diffuse diabetic macular edema

Efficacy duration of triamcinolone acetonide (steroid) for treatment of diabetic macular edema. Furthermore, dosage dependency of triamcinolone acetonide comparing a high dosage versus a low dosage.

Macular edema is the most important cause of visual impairment in diabetic patients. Intravitreal injections of antiVEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) agents and laser treatment are two effective therapies for stabilising visual acuity. However, antiVEGF therapy is very expensive and potentially needs to to be repeated for all patients life. Laser treatment, according to modified ETDRS (early treatment diabetic retinopathy study), produces retinal burns with possible negative consequences such as alterations in the visual fields. With micropulse treatment modality laser energy is delivered in short pulses ("micropulses") rather than as a continuous wave. In this way the amount of energy delivered to the retina and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is significantly reduced. This finer control of the photothermal effects should avoid any retinal and RPE damage. At the same time, according to several published reports, the efficacy of treatment appears to be equivalent to conventional laser therapy. Previous studies investigated the effects of 810nm micropulse laser therapy. Recently, this treatment modality has been made available also with 577nm wavelength, which corresponds to the maximum absorption level for blood. Aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of 577nm micropulse laser treatment compared to conventional modified ETDRS laser therapy.