Active clinical trials for "Depressive Disorder, Major"

Placebo pills (pills with no active ingredients) have been shown in research studies to somehow produce self-healing processes. The purpose of this study is to determine whether people will be willing to enter an open-label non-deceptive placebo treatment for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and whether open-label placebo can be effective for treating MDD in the context of a supportive physician-patient relationship.

The primary outcome of this study is to determine if predictors of response can select a population of patients with MDD that is effectively treatable by augmentation with ziprasidone. Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a broad category, including many forms of depressive illness, including those with only a single major depressive episode, those with episodic recurrence with intervening well states, those with chronic depressive/anxious states without intervening euthymia, and those with manic symptoms that do not meet threshold definitions of full mania/hypomania. In this heterogenous, large diagnostic definition, important groups of patients do not appear to respond well to antidepressants, and, conversely, based on observational studies, may respond well to neuroleptics. These predictors of response have begun to be identified and may serve to better design studies of neuroleptics in depressive illnesses. Among these predictors of response in MDD are clinical features that are more similar to bipolar illness than unipolar depression. These include a family history of bipolar disorder, antidepressant-induced mania, highly recurrent depressive episodes (>5), atypical depression, early age of onset of depression (< age 20), failure to respond to antidepressants, and antidepressant tolerance (initial response followed by later loss of response). The investigators propose to use these predictors to pick out patients that are more likely to respond to Geodon for MDD. This will be the first RCT of these predictors of depressive response applied to neuroleptics.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and the safety of two fixed doses of vortioxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder.

A multicenter, 10-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 50 mg of desvenlafaxine succinate sustained-release formulation (DVS SR) versus placebo in the treatment of peri- and postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder

Depression affects over one million people in Canada, resulting in $14.4 billion per year in costs to Canadian society. In order to prevent this often lifelong disorder, it is critically important to identify risk factors for the recurrence of depression. A crucial force in maintaining depression is the generation of stressful life events. That is, individuals who have a history of depression are likely to generate the very events that precipitate future depressive episodes (e.g., relationship break-up, fired from job, conflicts with the law) due to negative personality characteristics and disrupted social support networks resulting from previous episodes. This project is the first to test a model that examines the role of negative personality, low social support, and childhood abuse and neglect as risk factors for the generation of stressful life events that predict future depression. We will test this model in a group of patients meeting formal criteria for depression who will be treated and then followed up for 12 months or until depression recurrence. With this long-term design we will be in a unique position to understand how depression is maintained over time, thus suggesting important treatment strategies to prevent depression recurrence.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of Quetiapine extended release (XR) in combination with an selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or Venlafaxine versus Lithium in combination with an selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or Venlafaxine versus Quetiapine extended release monotherapy in subjects with treatment resistant depression as assessed by the changes from randomisation to week 6 in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. As an independent objective, the primary objective will also be evaluated in two subgroups of patients: (1) patients who were resistant to two previous antidepressant therapies and (2) in the subgroup of patients with one previous failure.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of (a) quetiapine XR and (b) mirtazapine on sleep when given as an antidepressant (monotherapy). We hypothesize that (a) quetiapine XR has an immediate and lasting positive effect on sleep in depressed patients which does not differ from the impact of mirtazapine on sleep in this group of patients; (b) in the context of a secondary objective, we expect an antidepressant effect of quetiapine XR which is equivalent to that of mirtazapine.

The primary aim of this study is to examine whether adolescent depression and the family context in which it develops is best treated using an individual adolescent intervention or an intervention that includes both the adolescent and the parents. This will be accomplished by conducting a randomized controlled pilot study of Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depressed Adolescents (IPT-A) in comparison to Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depressed Adolescents and Parents (IPT-AP).

To examine the safety and efficacy of long term administration of aripiprazole as an adjunctive therapy, co-administered with either a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or a selective-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), in subjects with major depressive disorder.

Primary: To compare the efficacy of OPC-34712 to placebo as adjunctive treatment to an assigned open-label marketed antidepressant treatment (ADT)in patients who demonstrate an incomplete response to a prospective eight week trial of the same assigned open-label marketed ADT.