Active clinical trials for "Malaria"

The primary objective is to confirm the hypothesis that azithromycin plus chloroquine is non-inferior to mefloquine for the treatment of symptomatic, uncomplicated malaria due to P. falciparum.

This open-label randomised controlled clinical trial will compare the safety, tolerability, therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of arterolane-piperaquine, arterolane-piperaquine plus mefloquine versus artemether-lumefantrine.in children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Kilifi, Kenya. This study will also provide an up to date insight on the current presence of antimalarial resistance in this site. In addition, all children will be treated with a single low dose of primaquine, dosing is age based. The investigators will recruit 219 patients aged 2 years to 12 years with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Kilifi County Hospital.

This is a double blind randomised controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of R21 adjuvanted with Matrix-M in healthy 5-17 month old children in a malaria endemic area.

In line with the global and regional efforts towards malaria elimination, a five year program was established to assist the NMCP in adopting targeted evidence-based elimination plans through a 'learn by doing' strategy. The project aims to generate knowledge as data is generated to inform the programmatic aspects of the elimination plan, most importantly how to clear malaria parasites from the asymptomatic reservoir.

This is a classical in vivo clinical trial, following World Health organization's recommendations, ran as a multisite study within Mozambique trying to assess the efficacy and safety in 4 sites of the two oral ACTS artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and Amodiaquine-Artesunate (AQ-AS), first line treatment for malaria in mozambique, for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in children aged<5 years.

Despite all efforts, malaria remains a public health concern, in particular in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The National Malaria Control program recommends artemisinin-based combination treatments (ACTs), in particular artesunate-amodiaquine or artemether-lumefrantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. Previous studies indicated that ACTs are still effective, with efficacy above the required threshold of 90%. It is required to assess regularly the efficacy of antimalarial drugs. I In case of increasing failure rates, alternative options can be decided ontime. The purpose of this trial is to assess efficacy and safety of artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ Winthrop®) and artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem Dispersible®) at day 28 in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in six surveillance sites around DRC.

USSPZV7 is a randomized, phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Sanaria® PfSPZ Vaccine administered on Days 1, 8 and 29 by direct venous inoculation (DVI) to assess safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and vaccine efficacy (VE) against heterologous controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with the 7G8 clone of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) conducted at 3 or 12 weeks after the third immunization. The trial is designed to determine if individuals living in a non-malaria endemic area such as the United States (US) are protected against heterologous CHMI conducted at these time points.

A Phase 1b study to assess the safety, tolerability and antimalarial activity of MMV533 against Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 blood stage infection in healthy volunteers

In Nigeria, malaria is the commonest reason for outpatient clinic attendance in childhood and is responsible for about 20% of childhood deaths. The emergence of strains of P. falciparum resistant to chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine led to severe worsening of morbidity and mortality from malaria. As a result of resistance to previously used monotherapy, the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2001, recommended that malaria-endemic countries experiencing drug-resistant malaria infection adopt combination therapy. Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is preferred to the non-ACT combination. In this randomized open-label clinical trial, the safety and efficacy of pyronaridine-artesunate and artemether-lumefantrine in the treatment of malaria among children aged 3 to 144 months who have microscopically confirmed symptomatic Plasmodium falciparum malaria were compared. The study was carried out at the Oni Memorial Children's Hospital, Ring Road Ibadan. One hundred and seventy-two children between 3 and 120 months who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled after obtaining written or witnessed signed informed consent from the parents or guardian. A detailed history and physical examination were carried out on each enrollee. Finger prick blood samples were taken from each enrolee for thick blood smear for malaria parasite, haematocrit, and blood spots on filter paper. Five millilitres of venous blood will be taken from an arm vein for baseline liver function tests, creatinine, and random blood glucose on days 0, 3, 7 and 28. Enrollees were randomized into one of two groups. Group one received pyronaridine-artesunate while group two received artemether-lumefantrine at standard doses. Enrollees were seen daily from days 0-3, and on days 7, 14, 21 and 28. Study drugs were administered supervised at standard dosage on days 0, 1, and 2. History taking, physical examination and blood smears were done at each contact time. Special attention will be paid to adverse effects. Parasite clearance time, fever clearance time and cure rates were compared between the two groups.

The objectives of this study contains 3 parts: (1) a comparison of 1-step parenteral artesunate (AS) versus conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate in patients with severe malaria to assess the feasibility of administration, parasite and fever clearance times in two countries, (2) a quantification of convenience and costs of the new 1-step artesunate parenteral formulation versus the conventional formulation in a randomised study, (3) A cost analysis of 1-step parenteral artesunate using data from Part 1 & Part 2. This will assess health facility-level costs, and also health system costs to encompass all costs of a potential change from conventional to 1-step artesunate, including re-training, materials, and drug replacement. The conventional formulation of injectable artesunate requires a 2-step reconstitution and dilution of the artesunate hemisuccinate powder. A new formulation of injectable artesunate has been developed by Fosun Pharma requiring a simpler 1-step reconstitution. Bioequivalence of the new formulation to the conventional formulation. For part 1, a total number of participants of this study would be 200 participants, estimated 100 per site will be recruited. For part 2, a total number of 40 semi-structured interviews with study staff, health staff, policy makers, and stake holders; and survey/questionnaires with 150 health staff.