Active clinical trials for "Malaria"

Pyronaridine: artesunate (Pyramax) is an antimalarial fixed-dose combination therapy which has been demonstrated to be well tolerated and effective treatment in patients with Plasmodium falciparum and vivax malaria. This open-label Phase I study has two parts: a drug-drug interaction part intended to investigate the interaction of Pyramax in the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2D6 probe metoprolol and a re-dosing evaluation part intended to investigate the differences on the changes in liver enzymes induced by Pyramax in a first and in a second treatment course and the effect of the redosing interval on the changes in liver enzymes induced by Pyramax in a first and in a second treatment course.

To assess the efficacy of artesunate-amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, in comparison with artemether-lumefantrine during 42 days follow up period in 720 children with acute uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria, in two different endemic ecological areas - Savanna and equatorial forest regions of Cameroon. We have set as specific objectives: To assess the efficacy of artesunate-amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, in comparison with artemether-lumefantrine during 14 and 28 days follow up period in children with acute uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in two different endemic areas. To evaluate the safety of artesunate-amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, in comparison with artemether-lumefantrine during 42 days follow up period in children with acute uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. To determine parasite clearance time (PCT) and fever clearance time (FCT) following the administration of the three trial regimens. To investigate the treatment response based on WHO criteria (WHO, 2003) in patients in all groups after trial. To investigate the Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and microsatellite markers of genes associated with drug resistance

Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum toward Artemisinins, the most important drug for the successful treatment of malaria, has been confirmed in Cambodia. There are few reports from neighbouring countries about delayed parasite rates. The investigators therefore aim to assess parasite clearance in malaria patients in central Vietnam when treated according to national standard guidelines.

This is a study assessing safety and efficacy of current national guidelines for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Bangladesh as well as to assess the G6PD status among the enrolled patients.

Plasmodium vivax can form dormant liver stages that reactivate weeks or months following an acute infection. Recurrent infections can be associated with a febrile illness, a cumulative risk of severe anaemia, and even mortality. In co-endemic areas the risk of recurrence after both P. vivax and P. falciparum infections can be over 50% within 3 months. The only drug we have to kill P. vivax hypnozoites is primaquine which is currently given as a 14 day regimen. In Papua a retrospective study found very low effectiveness for unsupervised treatment. If true this has profound effects on treatment policy, suggesting that greater efforts are needed to encourage adherence to treatment. We propose a cluster randomized, controlled, open label trial to assess the effectiveness of unsupervised versus supervised primaquine treatment in patients with uncomplicated malaria. Since the risk of recurrent P. vivax is high in patients with either P. vivax or P. falciparum, both infections will be included in the study. The study will be conducted in Mimika, in the southern part of Papua Province, Indonesia. Participants will be enrolled at village health posts and provided with schizontocidal treatment plus primaquine radical cure which will be either supervised or unsupervised depending on which cluster the clinic is in. Participants will be followed up for 6 months and assessed in regular intervals for the presence of patent and sub-patent malaria. The outcome of the study will contribute to an improved treatment scheme for uncomplicated malaria in this area.

This study is designed to compare the effectiveness of reactive focal drug administration (RFDA) using dihydroartemisinin+piperaquine (DHAP) versus reactive focal test and treat (RFTAT) using artemether+lumefantrine (AL) as a routine process for identifying and eliminating malaria transmission as measured through achieving zero seropositivity in children under five in Southern Province, Zambia. These two strategies are potential candidates for expanded malaria operational surveillance and elimination for low malaria transmission areas.

Drug efficacy testing is one of the most important tasks that is routinely undertaken by the National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) in Tanzania and has been recommended by the World health Organisation to monitor the efficacy of artemisinin based combination therapy (ACT) and possibly detect evolution/emergency of tolerance/resistance to these drugs. Currently, Artemether-lumefantrine (ALu) is the only ACT recommended by the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare and therefore testing of new ACTs such as dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PQ) is important because alternative drugs are urgently required. Meanwhile, NMCP is revising the guidelines for treatment of malaria in Tanzania and DHA-PQ has been earmarked as an alternative ACT to be used together with ALu. However, efficacy and safety data of DHA-PQ is missing since no studies have been done in Tanzania. Thus, a study is proposed to assess the efficacy and safety of DHA-PQ Vs ALu and provide important data which will enable the NMCP to make informed decisions; and possibly recommend DHA-PQ in the new Malaria treatment guidelines as the second line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in the country.

This is a cluster randomised controlled trial with factorial study design comparing the impact of reactive community-based malaria interventions: 1) presumptive treatment (or rfMDA, reactive focal mass drug administration) versus reactive case detection (RACD), and 2) reactive IRS (indoor residual spraying) versus control on the incidence of malaria in Namibia.

Acute kidney injury is a common complication of severe Plasmodium knowlesi malaria, and an important contributor to mortality. The exact pathogenic mechanisms of AKI in knowlesi malaria are not known, however it is hypothesised that haemolysis of red blood cells and subsequent release of cell-free haemoglobin leads to oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation in the renal tubules. A novel mechanism of paracetamol was recently demonstrated, showing that paracetamol acts as a potent inhibitor of hemoprotein-catalyzed lipid peroxidation. In a proof of concept trial, paracetamol at therapeutic levels was shown to significantly decrease oxidative kidney injury and improve renal function by inhibiting the hemoprotein-catalyzed lipid peroxidation in a rat model of rhabdomyolysis-induced renal injury. The investigators hypothesize that this novel inhibitory mechanism of paracetamol may provide renal protection in adults with knowlesi malaria by reducing the hemoprotein-induced lipid peroxidation that occurs in haemolytic conditions. As there is currently no consensus that exists concerning adequate medical treatment for severe malaria complicated by intravascular haemolysis and AKI, the potential application of paracetamol would be of benefit, especially as it is safe and widely available.

This study is a cluster-randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of community-based mass screening with a malaria rapid diagnostic test, and treatment of participants with positive tests with an appropriate antimalarial for reducing malaria transmission indices.