search

Active clinical trials for "Melanoma"

Results 2091-2100 of 2584

Skin Health Online for Melanoma: Better Risk Assessment

Melanoma (Skin)

This study will have two phases, with an added usability test after Phase I and before Phase 2. Phase 1: Cognitive Interviews of materials in Spanish. Phase 2: Personalized Genomic Testing for Skin Cancer (PGT-SC). The overarching goal of this study is to learn more about how to maximize the availability, comprehension and appropriate uptake of personalized genomics among different populations in New Mexico. Primary Care patients will be recruited in their primary health clinic to complete surveys about their understanding and beliefs of skin cancer and behaviors that might help prevent skin cancer. 6 out of every 7 patients will then be asked to go to a website to learn more about skin cancer risk. Once participants have completed the education modules on this site, participants will be given the option to request and complete a skin cancer genetic testing kit. All participants will be contacted again after three months to complete a follow-up set of surveys about skin cancer.

Completed6 enrollment criteria

Cryotherapy With in Situ Immunotherapy in Melanoma Metastasis

Melanoma (Skin)

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and its incidence has doubled every 20 years in France, where this cancer is responsible of more than 1600 deaths each year. Patients with early diagnosis have good prognosis and can be generally cured by surgery only. Advanced melanoma however has a very bad prognosis. Loco-regional lymph nodes are usually the first distant localization in metastatic melanoma. Lymph node dissection is then the recommended treatment, although it's impact on survival has never been proven. In the same way, the benefit risk profile of interferon as adjuvant treatment after lymph node dissection is still much debated. Recently, new treatments either with immunotherapy (ipilimumab, nivolumab) or by the targeted therapy dabrafenib/trametinib in patients with BRAF mutation have shown an impact on survival in the adjuvant setting after lymph node dissection. But, it has not yet been established if this strategy has a benefit gain compared to starting those treatments only in the metastatic setting after watchful follow-up. Moreover, if these novel therapies (targeted therapies: TT, immunotherapies : IT) demonstrated for the first time a real benefit in terms of survival or of responses rates in melanoma, physicians and patients had to address new problems, such as the management of unusual adverse events. Partial and dissociated responses can also be seen with those new treatments. Some patients will have complete response in some lesions, stabilization in others and progression in a few. It is to be expected that one of the real key points of this therapy is to be found here, as this situation is commonly seen, and it would probably be a poor choice to stop a treatment that is globally effective for progression of only 1 or 2 lesions, in a patient otherwise stabilized. That is the context in which interventional radiology (IR) should be considered as an extremely efficient option. IR is a real medical revolution in the last 2 decades. It provides not only the opportunity to determine the characteristics of residual lesion (fibrosis, necrosis, metastasis, or sarcoidosis,…) by biopsy, but allows also their targeted destruction through different technics (cryotherapy, radiofrequency, laser,…). The investigators are fortunate to have in their institution one of the best IR department of the world (headed by Prof. Afshin GANGI), with a technical platform unique in Europe that allows IR through ultrasound, scan, petscan and MRI. To the best of their knowledge, Immunotherapy associated with IR has not been performed so far. This association could in theory: Combine immunotherapy with tumoral necrosis, which inherently increases the effects of immunotherapy by massive tumoral leakage of danger signals and tumoral antigens; Allow direct injection in targeted zones, where the beneficial effect is desired, and thus increase the expected immune response; Reduce side effects related to immunotherapy, by reducing quantities injected; which seems particularly important in the (neo)-adjuvant setting. That's why the investigators are willing to conduct this pilot project, the objectives of which are: Providing a proof of the feasibility of this association, Obtaining preliminary insights on the effects on non-targeted lesions, Adding a translational research to establish the effect on tumor antigenic expression and the immune response.

Completed29 enrollment criteria

Effects of Simulated Solar Radiation on Human Skin in Preventing Skin Cancer

Melanoma

This clinical trial examines the effects of simulated solar radiation on human skin in preventing skin cancer. Testing whether new drugs affect biomarkers in the skin is a good first test of whether the drug might prevent skin cancer. Some biomarkers in skin, and even in moles, are affected after a person is exposed to sunlight. This study may help doctors learn more about what happens to the skin and moles when the participants are exposed to the sun.

Completed7 enrollment criteria

Bioequivalence Binimetinib 3 x 15 mg and 45 mg Formulations

MelanomaBRAF V600 Mutation2 more

The current commercially available MEKTOVI® (binimetinib) 15 mg tablets are provided as immediate release film-coated tablets for oral administration. For the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600 mutation, the recommended dosing regimen is 45 mg twice daily (bis in die, BID). No food effect with the commercial formulation of 15 mg was demonstrated. In order to reduce the patient's burden, a new strength tablet containing 45 mg of binimetinib as active ingredient is being developed. As a result, the number of tablets to be taken by the patients will be reduced from 6 tablets (6 x 15 mg) to 2 tablets (2 x 45 mg) per day. The evaluation of the bioequivalence between one 45 mg tablet and three 15 mg tablets is therefore required.

Completed19 enrollment criteria

A Study to Learn How Safe BAY2666605 is, How it Affects the Body, How it Moves Into, Through and...

Metastatic Melanoma and Other Solid Tumors

Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people who have advanced cancer. In this study researchers want to learn more about a new substance called BAY2666605. BAY2666605 triggers the formation of a complex of two proteins called SLFN12 and PDE3A. This complex drive cancer cells into cell death by a mechanism called apoptosis. The complex is only formed in the cancers which contain both proteins. This study is done in adult patients who have certain types of advanced cancers that cannot be cured by drugs that are currently available. The cancer types include skin cancer that has spread to other parts of the body and cancer that started in the bones or soft tissue, the ovaries, or the brain. Patients with these cancers are only included if the cells of the patient's cancer contain the building plan to produce SLFN12-phosphodiesterase 3A (PDE3A) complex. To confirm this, a specific test is performed with the cancer cells. The researchers will study how BAY2666605 moves into, through and out of the body. Researchers will try to find the best dose that can be given, how safe BAY2666605 is and how it affects the body. Researchers will also study the action of BAY2666605 against the cancer. Part A will include about 36 participants and up to another 12 participants. Part B will include about 41 participants. All of the participants will take BAY2666605 by mouth as either a liquid or as tablets. During the study, the participants will take the treatment in 4 week periods called cycles. In each cycle, the participants will in general take BAY2666605 once daily. The participants may also be asked to do overnight fasting before the intake of substance and to have standard high-fat, high-calorie breakfast on some days before taking the dose. These 4 week cycles will be repeated throughout the trial. The participants can take BAY2666605 until their cancer gets worse, until they have medical problems, or until they leave the trial. Participants will have around 18 visits in each cycle. Some of the visits can also be done via Phone. During the trial, the study team will take blood and urine samples, do physical examinations and check the participants' heart health using an electrocardiogram (ECG) and an ultrasound of the heart. The study team will also take pictures of the participants' tumors using CT or MRI scans. The study team will ask how the participants are feeling, if participants have any medical problems or if participants are taking any other medicine. About 1 month and 3 months after the last dose, the participants will have another visit and a phone call respectively where participants will be checked for and asked about medical problems. The researchers will then contact the participants every 3 months until the trial ends.

Completed28 enrollment criteria

High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) for Patients With Cancer-related Lymphedema in the Lower...

Lymphedema of LegCancer of Cervix6 more

The aim of the study is to explore the feasibility and safety of High Intensity Interval Training on a stationary bike for patients with lymphedema in the lower limbs and the role of compression garments during exercise. The design of the study is a cross-over randomized clinical trial. Participants will be randomized into two groups. Both will perform two separate exercise sessions.Group A will perform the first exercise with compression garment and the second session without compression garment, with wash-out period of 1 week between sessions. Group B will perform the exercise sessions in the opposite order.

Completed12 enrollment criteria

A Study of the Effect of Vemurafenib on the Pharmacokinetics of Acenocoumarol in Patients With BRAFV600...

Malignant MelanomaNeoplasms

This open-label, multicenter, 3-period, fixed-sequence study will evaluate the effect of multiple doses of vemurafenib on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of acenocoumarol in participants with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic malignancies. Participants will receive a single dose of acenocoumarol 4 mg orally on Day 1 and Day 23, vemurafenib 960 mg orally twice daily on Days 4-26. After completion of pharmacokinetic assessments on Day 26, eligible participants will have the option to continue treatment with vemurafenib as part of an extension study (GO28399 [NCT01739764]).

Completed22 enrollment criteria

A Study on the Effect of Vemurafenib on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Dose of Tizanidine in Patients...

Malignant MelanomaNeoplasms

This open-label, multicenter, 3-period, fixed-sequence study will evaluate the effect of multiple oral doses of vemurafenib on the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of tizanidine in participants with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic malignancies. Participants will receive a single oral dose of tizanidine on Day 1, vemurafenib orally twice daily on Days 2 to 21, and tizanidine and vemurafenib on Day 22. Eligible participants will have the option to continue treatment with vemurafenib as part of an extension study (NCT01739764).

Completed17 enrollment criteria

SAbR Induced Innate Immunity in Urothelial Carcinoma, Melanoma, and Cervical Carcinoma

Urothelial CarcinomaMelanoma1 more

The study is an exploratory prospective, single center study with correlative endpoints. The study will investigate the association of tumor cGAS STING signaling with SAbR. Tumor core biopsies will be processed and analyzed as described above. Medical records electronic medical records will be used to collect demographic and medical information and imaging studies.

Completed11 enrollment criteria

Exercise as a Supportive Measure for Patients Undergoing Checkpoint-inhibitor Treatment

PD-1 AntibodiesExercise1 more

Checkpoint inhibitors like the PD-1 antibodies Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab represent standard of care for patients with metastasized melanoma. Numerous high quality studies demonstrate that endurance and resistance training in cancer patients is safe and elicits beneficial effects. However, there is no systematic experience with regard to exercise interventions in patients undergoing checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Therefore, the Sportivumab Study aimed to investigate safety, feasibility and effectivity of a 12 week combined resistance and endurance exercise intervention program during checkpoint inhibitor treatment. It is planned to enroll 40 patients. Participants will be randomized into an experimental and a wait-list control group (20 per group). The wait-list control group will receive the exercise intervention program after week 13 of enrollment.

Completed8 enrollment criteria
1...209210211...259

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs