A Study of BDTX-4933 in Patients With BRAF and Select RAS/MAPK Mutation-Positive Cancers
Non-small Cell Lung CancerNon-small Cell Carcinoma31 moreBDTX-4933-101 is a first-in-human, open-label, Phase 1 dose escalation and multiple expansion cohort study designed to evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of BDTX-4933. The study population comprises adults with recurrent advanced/metastatic cancers harboring BRAF (Class I, II, and III), KRAS (other than G12C such as G12D, G12V), or NRAS mutations including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, histiocytic neoplasms, thyroid cancer, colorectal cancer, and other solid tumor cancers with or without brain metastases. All patients will self-administer BDTX-4933 orally in 28-day cycles until disease progression, toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.
Proof of Concept of TBio-4101, Lymphodepleting Chemo, IL-2 for Relapsed/Refractory Melanoma
Metastatic MelanomaUnresectable Melanoma8 moreThe purpose of this first in human study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of administering TBio-4101 (tumor infiltrating lymphocytes [TIL]) after receiving a lymphodepleting chemotherapy regimen and before receiving interleukin-2 (IL-2) in participants with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
A Phase 1/2a Study of IMM-1-104 in Participants With Previously Treated, RAS-Mutant, Advanced or...
Advanced Solid Tumor (Phase 1)Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma3 moreThis is an open-label, dose-exploration and expansion study to determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of IMM-1-104 when administered as monotherapy in participants with RAS-mutated advanced or metastatic solid tumors. The dose exploration will identify the candidate recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of IMM-1-104 to further explore the anti-tumor activity of IMM-1-104 as monotherapy in 4 Phase 2a tumor-specific cohorts.
A Study of IO102/IO103, Nivolumab, and Relatlimab in People With Melanoma
MelanomaThe researchers are doing this study to find out whether the study vaccines, IO102/IO103, given in combination with the standard-of-care drug combination, nivolumab and relatlimab, is a safe and effective treatment for people with untreated, unresectable melanoma.
A Clinical Study of V940 Plus Pembrolizumab in People With High-Risk Melanoma (V940-001)
MelanomaThe purpose of this study is to learn if V940 which is an individualized neoantigen therapy (INT; formerly, called messenger ribonucleic acid [mRNA]-4157) with pembrolizumab (MK-3475) is safe and prevents cancer from returning in people with high-risk melanoma. Researchers want to know if V940 with pembrolizumab is better than receiving pembrolizumab alone at preventing the cancer from returning.
OH2 Injection in Melanoma
MelanomaTo evaluate the efficacy of OH2 injection in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who have failed at least second-line standard therapy, using investigator-selected salvage chemotherapy or best supportive care (BSC) as controls.
A Study to Assess YH003 in Combination With Pebolizumab and Albumin Paclitaxel Injection in Subjects...
Mucosal MelanomaThis study is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of YH003 in combination with pembrolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable/metastatic mucosal melanoma.
Interleukin-6 Receptor Inhibitor Sarilumab in Combination With Ipilimumab, Nivolumab and Relatlimab...
MelanomaUnresectable MelanomaThe study will evaluate how safe the study drug is, how well you tolerate it, and how it works in the body and the disease's response to the drug. The study drug being tested is sarilumab, when given with the combination of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and relatlimab in patients with stage III or stage IV melanoma that cannot be removed by surgery. Previous studies have provided a strong rationale for combining sarilumab, with ipilimumab, nivolumab and relatlimab in metastatic melanoma to reduce side effects and potentially work better for this type of cancer. Sarilumab is an FDA-approved inhibitor of the receptor for the cytokine IL-6, currently approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, but it is not FDA-approved to treat melanoma. This means that the use of Sarilumab to treat melanoma is considered investigational. The other drugs which will be administered in this study, ipilimumab and nivolumab, are also monoclonal antibodies, but they target different proteins. Ipilimumab and nivolumab are both approved by the FDA to treat advanced stage III and IV melanomas. The nivolumab + relatlimab FDC (fixed dose combination) being used in this study is considered investigational, meaning it is not approved by the FDA.
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CyPep-1 in Combination With Pembrolizumab for the...
Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell CarcinomaAdvanced Breast Cancer1 moreThis Phase 1b/2a study will assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamics of CyPep-1 when administered directly into measurable tumor lesions in combination with the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab. Additionally, the study will assess anti-tumor effects of CyPep-1 on injected lesions and non-injected target lesions identified at baseline, as well as local and systemic immunological effects of CyPep-1 in combination with pembrolizumab.
Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Mucous Melanomas of the Female Lower Genital Tract...
Malignant MelanomaGynecologic CancerThe present monocentric prospective phase 2 study aims to reproduce the results obtained at NIRS thus offering the possibility of obtaining a promising rate of progression-free survival (PFS) and local control (LC) in patients diagnosed with mucosal melanoma of lower genital tract. Systemic treatment with immunotherapy is not the subject of this study but is allowed both in the neoadjuvant and sequential regimens. Melanomas have always been considered poorly radiosensitive. It is now accepted that high LET (Linear Energy Transfer) particle beams, such as carbon ions, can offer a biological advantage, compared to photons treatment, in radio-resistant neoplasms treatment, thanks to their higher biological efficacy (RBE) against tumours with a low α/ ß ratio. In addition, carbon ions have the physical advantage of an inverted depth deposition profile compared to photons, allowing then a steep dose gradients that ensure increased sparing of adjacent healthy organs at risk (OARs).