Active clinical trials for "Breast Neoplasms"

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of single agent ISB1302 in subjects with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have been treated with all known therapies known to confer clinical benefit.

The objective of the study is to demonstrate equivalency in treatment effect, as determined by objective measurements, between the modified therapy cycle software and the FDA-cleared Flexitouch therapy cycle software.

Resistance to treatment is one of the major themes in cancer research. Despite this, the definition and clinical implications of resistance to treatment remain under-explored, and patient-physician communication in this context still constitutes a challenge. When resistance to cancer treatments occurs, physicians not only have to explain to the patient the phenomenon of resistance, often based on complex results (biological results, genomic tests, imaging, etc.), but also need to offer alternative therapies, whilst fostering shared medical decision-making. These different tasks are particularly challenging for clinicians, especially since there are large individual differences at patient level. Indeed, each patient has his or her own unique information needs, capacity for understanding, and level of desire to participate in treatment decisions.

A retrospective observational analysis of de-identified Flatiron Health Analytic Database to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns and effectiveness of Palbociclib + AI as first-line therapy in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the US clinical practices.

This trial collects information about factors that affect communication of genetic test results, decision-making, and access to genetic testing in women with hereditary gynecological cancers. Studying individuals who are positive for a genetic mutation and immediate biological family members (including a parent, full-sibling, or child) may help identify cancer genes and other persons at risk.

This is a phase 2 single-arm, open-label determining efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Abemaciclib and Fulvestrant in subjects with Hormone receptor positive patients with localized non-metastatic breast cancer who develop local recurrence while on adjuvant endocrine therapy with molecular evidence of endocrine resistance.

HR+/HER2-negative BC represent ∼70% of all newly diagnosed breast tumours and are responsible for most recurrences and deaths due to this disease, and despite available standard therapies, ∼15-20% of hormone tumours recur at distant sites. As BC is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous disease, intrincsic subtype may play an important role in classifying patients. In this case, HER2-E subtype is present in approximately 6.6-11.0% of HR+/HER2-negative tumors and might express either HER2, estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR), we also know that HER2-E is present twice as much in metastatic tumors compared to primary tumors and that HER2-E patients may benefit in terms of PFS form an anti-HER2 drug as was showed using retrospective sample in EGF30008 trial. Therefore, incorporation of novel drugs in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) can improve patient outcomes in HR+/HER2-negative BC advanced disease specially in those with HER2-E subtype. Methods NEREA is an open-label, single arm, multicenter phase II study evaluating treatment with neratinib in combination with ET in pre and post-menopausal women and men with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-enriched (HER2-E), HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer who had recurrence or progression while receiving previous ET (either aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen or fulvestrant) in the adjuvant setting or to treat advanced disease or both. The study will follow a Simon's 2-stage design with one interim and one final efficacy analysis. The primary objective will is assess the efficacy of neratinib in combination with ET is this group of patients, efficacy will be measured as Progression-Free Survival at 6 months (PFS6) defined as the proportion of patients alive and without progression, locally assessed by the investigator through the use of RECIST v.1.1 at 24 weeks after first treatment administration, imaging evaluation will be performed every 8 weeks for the first 12 months following treatment start, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Secondary endpoints include Clinical Benefit Rate at 6 months , Overall Response rate, Duration of response, Time to response and Incidence, duration and severity of Adverse Events. The interim analysis will be conducted when 33 patients are evaluable for the primary endpoint having the potential for at least 3 'on treatment' disease assessment scans. If less than 15 patients achieved a PFS6, the trial will be terminated for futility in favor of the null hypothesis. If more than 28 patients achieved a PFS6, the trial will be stopped in favor of the alternative hypothesis demonstrating activity. If none of the two above-mentioned conditions are attain, up to a further 23 patients may be evaluated, for at least a total of 56 evaluable patients. Therefore, if a total of 28 or more patients achieved a PFS6 at the end of the second stage, then the null will be rejected in favor of the alternative. Eligible patients will receive neratinib 240 mg every day in combination with ET, with either exemestane, fulvestrant or tamoxifen: exemestane 25 mg every day orally, tamoxifen 20mg every day orally or fulvestrant 500 mg administered in two intramuscular injections of 250 mg each at C1D15 and at D1 of each subsequent 28-day cycle at investigator discretion. LHRH agonist will be used in men and premenopausal women if no oophorectomy has been performed previously. All patients will take prophylactic loperamide with a stablished doses scheme during the firs cycle and on demand in subsequent cycles

The aim of this trial is to assess if patients treated with the combination of ribociclib and endocrine therapy respond to treatment as fast as patients treated with chemotherapy only, without decreasing their quality of life (QoL).

Zedora registration was based on studies of women with metastatic breast cancer, but its approval includes adjuvant treatment. Thus, prospective data of drug use in localized disease are lacking, as well as are real-world safety and efficacy data, taking into consideration comorbidities and compliance difficulties. This will be an observational study of patients receiving adjuvant Zedora at several Brazilian institutions for the purpose of describing its efficacy and safety.

This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, Phase 2/3 study in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with no more than one prior systemic therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic disease.