search

Active clinical trials for "Mandibular Fractures"

Results 1-10 of 41

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INNOVATIVE BONE HEALING TECHNIQUES

To Assess the Bone Healing in Fracture Mandible Defects

the study intends to observe the outcome of interventions (concentrated growth factor with autograft and xenograft) used to expedite bone healing and adaptation with minimal side effects. Three different modalities are being used to bridge the mandibular fracture defects (>5mm-<5cm). Those modalities include group A- autograft, group B-autograft with concentrated growth factor, and group C- xenograft with concentrated growth factor. the outcomes are measured in terms of acquired bone density (Hounsfield unit) that is obtained at the 4th and 6th month post-operatively via cone-beam computed tomography.

Recruiting11 enrollment criteria

Comparison of Operating Room Time Length With the Use of Virtual Surgical Planning Versus Conventional...

Mandibular Fractures

The purpose of this trial is to compare operating room time between conventional treatment techniques (without Virtual surgical Planning (VSP)) versus use of VSP and surgically-guided techniques and to compare and contrast the effect of any other variables that might have an effect on the overall result

Recruiting10 enrollment criteria

THE EFFICACY OF RESORBABLE PLATES VERSUS TITANIUM PLATES IN TERMS OF STABILITY IN MANDIBULAR FRACTURES....

Comparison of Resorbable Plates With Titanium Plates

Objective To compare the efficacy of resorbable plates against titanium plates to determine the fixation stability in reducing mandibular fractures Method: Subjects will be recruited and divided into two groups by random allocation. Consents will be obtained and fracture sites will be examined clinically and radiographically. Control group will receive titanium plates and test group will receive resorbable plates. The patients will be recalled immediately at first postop day then at the end of the first month , second month and the third month.They will be evaluated for the reduction of the fractures.

Recruiting9 enrollment criteria

Computer Guided Screw Holes Locating Guide and Custom-made Plates

Mandibular Fractures

Preoperative CT. Virtual reduction of broken segments on software. Gain occlusion. Design surgical screw holes locating guide. Design the custom-made plates. Print the screw holes locating guide and the custom-made plate. under general anesthesia the parasymphseal fracture will be reduced using screw holes locating guide and the custom-made plates.

Recruiting17 enrollment criteria

The MANTRA Trial (MANdibular TRauma and Antibiotic Use)

Mandible FracturePost-operative Antibiotics

FULL TITLE OF THE PROJECT Should we use post-operative antibiotics following surgery for patients with mandible fractures? The MANTRA trial (MANdibular TRauma and Antibiotic use) SUMMARY OF RESEARCH (ABSTRACT) Research Question: Are post-operative antibiotics required following surgery for patients with mandible fractures? Background: Mandible fractures are the commonest facial fractures needing surgery and account for a significant percentage of the acute workload in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) units. The UK records over 6000 new cases per year. Patients having surgery for mandible fractures have a theoretical risk of developing surgical site infection, due to the proximity of the fracture lines to the oral cavity microbes and the presence of foreign body (titanium fixation miniplates). For this reason, clinicians often prescribe antibiotics after surgery, to reduce the risk of infection. Previous systematic reviews and a multicentre cohort study performed by this team, revealed significant clinical variation in post-operative antibiotic prescription amongst UK OMFS clinicians and the presence of clinical equipoise. Antibiotic overuse can lead to antibiotic resistance and other antibiotic-related side effects; judicious antibiotic use and stewardship is of paramount importance. Aim: To determine whether post-operative antibiotics are required at all, following surgery for mandible fractures, and, if so, what is the most clinically- and cost-effective regimen Objectives: Primary Objective To conduct a Randomized Controlled Trial (MANTRA) in order to establish the non-inferiority (or not) of not giving post-operative antibiotics versus 2 other post-operative antibiotic regimens. An internal pilot phase will optimise recruitment and retention. Secondary Objectives Measure the cost-effectiveness of the proposed antibiotic pathways Assess patient and clinician acceptability to change clinical practice Process evaluation to inform dissemination and implementation Methods: The investigators designed and propose the MANTRA RCT to compare 3 post-operative antibiotic approaches to prevent Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) following surgery for mandible fractures. The MANTRA trial is a large open label, multicentre study in NHS OMFS units. The 3 study arms represent the most common clinical pathways in the UK based on previous work; the control group is the approach prescribed by most UK OMFS clinicians. All patients will receive 1 dose of IV antibiotics (co-amoxiclav 1.2g, if no penicillin allergy, which is the most commonly used prophylactic antibiotic currently) on induction of anaesthesia, prior to their surgery. The participants will be randomised to the following (1:1:1): Group A: No further antibiotics Group B: 2 further postoperative IV doses of co-amoxiclav 1.2g Group C: 2 further postoperative IV doses (as above), followed by a 5-day course of oral co-amoxiclav 625mg every 8 hours if no penicillin allergy (Control). Trial processes will be optimised by an internal pilot phase ensuring we recruit, randomise, and retain participants with clear progression criteria. We will also conduct cost-effectiveness analyses and process evaluation for dissemination and implementation Timeline: Start of grant: 1st July 2023 Start of RCT / pilot: 1st January 2024 End of pilot: 30th June 2024 End of recruitment: 31st December 2026 End of follow-up: 30th June 2027 Completion: 31st December 2027 Impact and dissemination: Practice changing outputs that standardise the use of antibiotics in mandible fractures in the NHS and provide a framework for other surgical prophylaxis research A bespoke clinical dissemination plan via an engagement and training legacy Cost-effectiveness data to inform policy making A research legacy and change of culture in the specialty of OMFS

Not yet recruiting13 enrollment criteria

Focused Registry to Collect Clinical Data on the MatrixWAVE System

Mandibular Fractures

Following standard of care (routine) procedures, a total number of 50 patients suffering from a non-condylar and/or condylar fractures of the mandible requiring Mandibulo-maxillary fixation (MMF) for a minimum of two weeks during or subsequent to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) will be prospectively enrolled in this focused registry. Classification of the injury and the time needed for application of the MatrixWAVE MMF system will be collected. Follow-up visits will be performed between 2 to 6 weeks and 3 months according to standard of care to evaluate the mandible function impairment, pain and local complications (anticipated procedure-related adverse events) related to the MatrixWAVE MMF system.

Recruiting14 enrollment criteria

3D Printed Models for Mandibular Fracture Repair

Mandible FractureMaxillofacial Trauma

The investigators will test the hypothesis that patients randomized to the intervention (3D printing with pre-bent plate) arm have less operative room time and less time for the critical part of the procedure than patients in the control arm (no 3D printing, current standards of care). Personalized medicine and care for fracture treatment.

Not yet recruiting9 enrollment criteria

A Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study on Biomet Microfixation HTR PEKK (Midface), Facial & Mandibular...

TumorFacial Fracture9 more

This study will address medical devices manufactured by Biomet Microfixation (d.b.a. Zimmer Biomet) designed for fixation and stabilization of the facial and mandibular skeleton.

Recruiting11 enrollment criteria

A New Surgical Instrument in Treatment of Conlylar Fracture: Condylar Reductor

Mandibular Fracture

In condylar fracture surgery, reduction is the most difficult step and the key factor which determined the postoperative outcome. Therefore, the aim of this study is to develop a new instrument, which the investigators call condylar redactor, to assist the surgeon to reduct the condylar segments effectively.

Completed5 enrollment criteria

Effects of the Bilateral Mandibular Nerve Block (V3) in Mandibular Osteotomy

Mandibular Fracture TraumaOrthognathic Surgery1 more

The sensory innervation of the face depends on the trigeminal (fifth cranial) which is divided into three branches, the mandibular nerve (V3) having motor fibers to the temporal and masseter muscle. The regional anesthesia of the face has grown in recent years for performing certain actions under light general anesthesia or sedation. The mandibular block is a simple and reliable technique but little used. Yet it reduces postoperative pain sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular branch by reducing consumption of opioids and in the oropharynx cancer surgery. Made with ropivacaine, known for its vasoconstrictive action, it also improves the visibility of the operative field during mandibular osteotomies reducing bleeding. Despite a real clinical benefit (ease of implementation, latency and duration of action of the local anesthetic), the V3 block ropivacaine is not evaluated in the maxillofacial surgery.

Completed11 enrollment criteria
12...5

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs