Active clinical trials for "Ankle Fractures"

The aim of this study is to compare standard post operative rehabilitation with a simplified wooden block stretching protocol that will yield similar results.

Our null hypothesis is that fibular intramedullary fixation (IMFN) does not impact complication rates when compared to standard of care treatment with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). There are no current or past RCTs comparing these fixation techniques to one another in diabetic patients. There is good data supporting both the use of intramedullary fixation for fibular fractures alone, and in high-risk patient populations (elderly, and diabetics). However, the effectiveness of these methods with respect to each other has never been investigated. The knowledge gained will allow us to potentially influence and adapt protocols to treat this patient population. Additionally, resources available at our institution provide a supportive framework with which to maintain contact with patients after hospital discharge. These key factors will allow us to perform a robust analysis of this population, to include outcomes measures of function and complications.

Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel) has been recently studied as the active agent utilized in various nerve block. Due to its liposomal form allowing for extended delivery, Exparel has been used in various peri-operative nerve blocks among multiple orthopaedic specialties in hopes of achieving improved pain control and decreased opioid use. This study compares the efficacy and effect on opioid use of peripheral nerve blocks and local infiltration with and without Exparel in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery.

Background: An anatomical reconstruction of ankle congruity is an important prerequisite in the operative treatment of acute ankle fractures. But, despite an anatomic reduction, patients suffer from residual problems like chronic pain, stiffness, persistent swelling and instability after these fractures. There is growing evidence, that this poor outcome is related to the concomitant traumatic intraarticular pathology. Therefore, supplementary ankle arthroscopy has been proposed in acute ankle fractures as it is a valuable tool to confirm the anatomic reposition and to further identify and manage associated intraarticular injuries. The arthroscopic treatment of these pathologies might result in a better outcome after complex ankle fractures. Nevertheless, until now, the vast majority of ankle fractures are managed by open procedures only. Still, indications for arthroscopically assisted open reduction and internal fixation (AORIF) are not clearly stated, and the effectiveness of AORIF compared with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) has not yet been determined for complex ankle fractures. In this context, only a prospective randomized study can sufficiently answer these open questions. Therefore, the investigators plan a randomized controlled trial intended to report the short-, midterm- and long-term follow-up of patients who underwent operative treatment of acute ankle fractures - with and without ankle arthroscopy. Methods/Study design: The investigators will perform a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of AORIF compared to ORIF with a sample size of 40 patients per group. The investigators include patients with an acute ankle fracture after written informed consent. Primary outcome of the investigators' study is the difference of the AOFAS score (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society) between the intervention (AORIF) and comparison (ORIF) group after a follow-up of 2 years. Several secondary outcome parameters will be assessed as well. Statistical analysis will be performed using a two-sided Student's t-test. Discussion: Until today, there are only two randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) compared to arthroscopically assisted open reduction and internal fixation (AORIF). Both studies only included patients with isolated fractures of the distal fibula at the level of the syndesmosis. These are the most simple fractures that are regularly treated operatively. Both studies documented a high incidence of intraarticular disorders in the AORIF group, but only one could show significant better results in the AORIF group. Moreover, several other studies could consistently demonstrate that the intraarticular damage is even more pronounced the more complex the fracture is. Consequently, a more distinctive effect of arthroscopy in complex fractures involving two malleoli or more has to be assumed when compared to these simple fractures.

A clinical trial comparing the outcomes of fixation of medial malleolar fractures either by fully threaded uni-cortical 4mm positional screws vs 4mm lag screws.

This project consists of a randomized controlled study design. Study candidates will include all patients 18 years or older, who were evaluated at UCSD and found to have an acute ankle syndesmosis injury requiring surgery. Patients who consent to study participation will be randomized to receive one of two standard of care procedures - either a suture button or Fibulink implant. Outcome measures, including the Olerud-Molander and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores, pain, range of motion, time to return to work, and radiographic evaluation will be collected for each participant. Given the potential degenerative changes and poor radiographic and clinical outcomes with inadequate repair of the syndesmosis, it is imperative to evaluate existing and emerging methods of fixation for patients with acute ankle fractures with syndesmosis injuries.

This study aims to 1) characterize skeletal muscle pH during/after tourniquet use and 2) investigate any relationship between intraoperative tourniquet use and postoperative functional measures and patient-reported outcomes.

The aim of this study is to investigate complication rates and clinical outcome following mobilization and pain-dependent full weight-bearing in a large cohort of patients with surgically treated ankle fractures. The study design is a pragmatic, multi-center, multi-surgeon, prospective outcome study. Included will be adult patients with any isolated ankle fracture which was treated surgically without additional syndesmotic stabilization (suture-button or syndesmotic screw). Patients included are advised to conduct pain-dependent full weight-bearing without immobilization starting at the day of study inclusion. Follow-up points are 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, and 12 months. Data assessment include radiographic follow-up, complication assessment, return to work/sports, rang of ankle motion, and patient-rated outcome scores (MoxFQ, EFAS, OMAS, EQ-5D-5L). The primary outcomes are complications at 3 months and patient-rated outcome at 12 months. The sample size calculation revealed a final total sample size of 360 patients.

Surgical treatment for patients with a fracture of the ankle or distal radius is commonly offered on an outpatient basis. Patients are routinely discharged from hospital within 4 hours of their procedure. The surgery is commonly performed under peripheral nerve block with sedation, or under general anesthesia with postoperative peripheral nerve block, (if required for analgesic purposes). It is unclear which of these two strategies offers patients superior pain relief in the first few days following surgery. This trial aims to compare the pain intensity and analgesic medication consumption between patients in these two groups.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the ability of the Fibulink Syndesmosis Repair System to maintain reduction of the ankle syndesmosis. Appropriate reduction of the syndesmosis is critical due the changes in tibiotalar contact pressure observed in cadaveric studies.6,7 Malreduction and instability of the distal tibiotalar joint can lead to chronic instability, increased articular damage and ultimately degenerative arthritis.7,8 Medial to lateral translation of distal tibia and fibula of 2 mm or more has been considered pathologic.9 Earlier biomechanical study demonstrated the Fibulink system is superior in maintaining displacement of less than 2 mm.4 Given the improved strength, we also look to evaluate the outcomes of initiating full weight bearing (100%) with Controlled Ankle Motion (CAM) boot at 4 weeks postoperatively. One of the big limitations for trans-osseous screw fixation is delayed weight bearing due to risk of screw breakage.1 Suture button technique allowed for early weight bearing with average of 6 weeks postoperatively using TightRope.2,10-12By initiating full weight bearing (100%) with CAM boot at 4 weeks postoperatively, this would be a significant improvement in current clinical practice.