Active clinical trials for "Medically Unexplained Symptoms"

Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) are a common and important problem in primary care. Patients repeatedly presenting MUS to their general practitioner (GP) suffer from their symptoms, are functionally impaired, and are at risk of unnecessary and possibly harmful tests, referrals and treatment. Evidence indicate that specific interventions for patients with MUS, such as reattribution therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy are of limited help. According to experts in this field a multi-component approach is most helpful for these patients. This pilot trial aims to test the systematic identification of eligible patients, to assess the acceptability of the intervention and to estimate potential treatment effects for a larger trial. It's a randomised pilot study consisting of patients with MUS in primary care. Patients will be randomized to intervention (usual care and additional psychosomatic therapy) or control condition (usual care alone). Patients will be followed for one year. Participants are patients consulting their GP more than once with MUS and in which the GP presumes that psychosocial distress is an underlying cause. The intervention is the psychosomatic therapy delivered by a psychosomatic therapist, consists of a combination of information and education, relaxation therapy and mindfulness, cognitive approaches and activating therapy. This multi-component approach is captured into a protocol in which therapists are able to modify the treatment in order to deliver a tailor-made treatment for patients with MUS. Primary outcome measures are: the number of patients identified and recruited, perceived symptom severity, measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and patients' self-rated symptoms of distress, depression, anxiety and somatization (4DSQ: The Four Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire). Other primary outcome measures are the time needed to include the eligible patients, the number of withdrawals in the intervention and control group, compliance in the therapy group and the number of patients who complete the questionnaires. Secondary outcome measures are: symptoms of hyperventilation (NHL: Nijmegen Hyperventilation List), physical and mental health status and quality of life (SF-36), and level of functioning (MAF: measure of general functioning). Patient satisfaction with the received therapy is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Medical consumption will be measured by the Cost Diary for medical consumption.

This study investigates the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a self-guided, exposure-based intervention for individuals who suffer from severe health anxiety. The study is a prospective single-group study based at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, where 20-25 adults with DSM-5 Illness anxiety disorder or Somatic symptom disorder are enrolled in 8 weeks of unguided exposure-based treatment via the Internet. Outcomes include self-reported health anxiety symptoms, credibility and expectancy, adherence to the treatment protocol, client satisfaction, and negative events.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the effectiveness of supportive psychotherapy in post covid-19 syndrome patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: What is the effect of supportive psychotherapy on psychological and somatic symptoms in post covid-19 syndrome patients? What is the effect of supportive psychotherapy on the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in post covid-19 syndrome patients? What is the effect of supportive psychotherapy on heart rate variability in post covid-19 syndrome patients? Participants will be given supportive psychotherapy in the form of an online group for 3 times a week with a duration of psychotherapy ranging from 1 - 2 hours per session. Researchers will compare the supportive psychotherapy group to education group as control. The control group will be given education about Post Covid-19 syndrome in the form of an online group for 3 times a week with a duration of around 1 - 2 hours per session.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether cognitive-behavioral therapy enriched with strategies from emotion regulation training leads to better improvement in somatic symptoms and comorbid problems than cognitive-behavioral therapy alone.

Background Severe health anxiety, Somatic symptom disorder or Illness anxiety disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 (DSM-5), is associated with considerable personal distress, functional disability and societal costs. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) for severe health anxiety, both on anxiety itself and on secondary symptom measures (for example of depression). One published randomized controlled trial (RCT) has examined the feasibility of delivering CBT for severe health anxiety via the Internet as a form of guided self help. Participants had contact with a therapist via an e-mail-like system throughout the treatment. This approach yielded results superior to a waiting-list condition, thus potentially greatly increasing the availability of psychological treatment. However, more studies on the effects of Internet-delivered CBT are warranted (NCT01673035 being one). Additionally, little is known about the active ingredients and mechanisms of change involved in Internet-delivered CBT. For example, the significance of therapist support in relation to treatment outcomes remains to be determined. CBT-based self-help literature, so called bibliotherapy, has shown great promise in the treatment of several anxiety disorders, including panic disorder and social anxiety disorder. Two small pilot studies have indicated that bibliotherapy with no or minimal therapist contact could be suitable for treating health anxiety. Aim of the study The aim of the present RCT is to compare therapist-guided Internet-delivered CBT (n=33), Internet-delivered CBT without therapist guidance (n=33), CBT-based bibliotherapy without therapist guidance (n=33) and a waiting-list control condition (n=33) for adult participants with severe health anxiety. Participants in all treatment programs are expected to be significantly improved on measures of health anxiety, compared to participants allocated to the waiting-list condition.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of a parent-only, group-based intervention intended to treat youth with chronic, unexplained medical symptoms such as (but not limited to) chronic fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, headache, and abdominal pain. Prior to and following the intervention, the child and parent(s) will be asked to complete several questionnaires about their well-being and functioning. The investigators predict that participation in this intervention will lead to change in relevant outcomes, including youth symptoms and functional impairment, and parenting stress and accommodation of symptoms. The investigators also predict that this group will be acceptable and feasible for parents.

Background Severe health anxiety is a highly distressing, often debilitating, psychological problem. Since the release of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 (DSM-5) its clinical manifestations are increasingly often referred to as Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD) or Illness Anxiety Disorder (IAD). Despite often being overlooked in routine care, several treatments for severe health anxiety have shown great promise, the most well-established being Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Traditionally, CBT - like most other psychotherapies - has typically been delivered face-to-face. That is, the patient physically meeting with the therapist once a week for the whole of the treatment. Internet-delivered CBT does not rest on this requirement, but has nevertheless been shown to be efficacious for severe health anxiety (see for example NCT01673035). Aim of the study The present study aims to compare the effects of Internet-delivered CBT and CBT face-to-face for severe health anxiety in a randomized controlled trial. A non-inferiority criterion is applied to determine if Internet-delivered CBT is at least as efficacious as its well-established predecessor.

General practitioners play a key role in the management of one of the most complex problems facing the health care system: the large group of patients with unexplained medical symptoms, but effective treatment strategies are lacking in primary care. The purpose of this study is to compare a new intervention delivered by the general practitioner versus re-attribution of symptoms, which is the currently recommended best treatment for patients with high levels of medically unexplained physical symptoms.

The present study is a randomized clinical trial of an emotional awareness and expression intervention (EAET) and a mindfulness meditation intervention (MMT) for Wayne State University students with anxiety and somatic symptoms. Each of these treatments will be compared to a wait list control condition and to one another to evaluate how well the treatments improve physical and psychological symptoms, stress, and interpersonal functioning of 120 Wayne State University students at 4-week and 8-weeks post-randomization. This research is intended to provide an evidence-based approach to working with emotions to improve both anxiety and somatic symptoms in young adults and will illuminate how EAET compares to the commonly used mindfulness training. It is hypothesized that both active interventions will be superior to no treatment, and differences between the two treatments will be explored.

Background: The prevalence of severe health anxiety is reported to be 1-2% in Western communities. This functional disorder is difficult for medical doctors to treat, the course of the disorder is often chronic, and that is costly for the social and health care systems as well as for the patients. A Cochrane metaanalysis from 2009 finds evidence for effectiveness of individual cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for patients with hypochondriasis. But no randomised controlled trials (RCT) of the effectiveness of classical CBT delivered only in groups for patients with severe health anxiety (hypochondriasis/illness anxiety disorder) has yet been conducted. Aims: 1) to examine the effectiveness of group-CBT for patients with severe health anxiety compared to a wait-list group receiving usual care, 2) to perform a categorical and dimensional assessment of personality, 3) to examine predictors of outcome especially comorbid personality disorders, 4) to examine the relation between personality, illness perception and treatment outcome, 5) to compare the cost-effectiveness of these two treatments, 6) at a 2 years follow up to examine the course and long-term effectiveness of group-CBT for patients with severe health anxiety and some also followed by psychological treatment for comorbid personality disorders. Main hypothesis: Patients with severe HA who have received group CBT will at 6-month follow-up compared to a wait-list group receiving usual care show a significantly reduction in health anxiety. Methods: 84 patients referred from medical doctors during 2014-15 to the Clinic of Liaison Psychiatry in Koege, Region Zealand, Denmark, will be included and block randomised per 14 patients to either weekly group-CBT with 7 patients and 2 therapists for 3 hours a week in 12 weeks or wait-list with usual care for 9 months. Inclusion: Severe health anxiety (dominant mental disorder), score on WI-7>21,4, age 18-65 years, Danish speaking, informed consent. Exclusion: Another severe treatment demanding mental disorder, risk of suicide or psychosis, a serious somatic disease, pregnancy, dependency of drugs, alcohol or medication. Diagnostic assessment: The patients are included using research criteria for severe health anxiety (for ICD-11) and semi-structured interviews developed for DSM-IV, SCAN (general psychopathology) and SCID-II (personality disorders). Criteria for hypochondriasis from ICD-10 and illness anxiety disorder/somatic symptom disorder from DSM-5 are used for subcategorising. Dimensions and traits of personality are assessed by the questionnaire PID-5 included in DSM-5, section III. Outcome measures: The primary outcome measure is the questionnaire for health anxiety, Whiteley Index 7 (WI-7), with a cut-off for remission on 21,4 or a blinded diagnostic assessment of no severe health anxiety present 6 months after end of treatment. The secondary outcome measures are questionnaires for health anxiety (HAI), general psychopathology (SCL-90-R), level of personality disorders (PID-5), level of functioning (SF-36), quality of life (WHO-5, EQ-5D), Illness perception (IPQ), alcohol consumption (CAGE) and register data for number of sick days and use of social and health care and a blinded global assessment of functioning (F-GAF). Time frame: Data wil be analysed, and results wil be disseminated from 2016.