Comparison of Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid Mesotherapy Versus 0.9% Normal Saline for Melasma
Effect of DrugsAdverse Effects of Medical DrugsIt is a randomized controlled trial in which investigators determine the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TA) by mesotherapy in comparison to normal saline on participants having Melasma.
Study Evaluating the Efficacy of DOSE Formulations in Treating Melasma and Cutaneous Signs of Aging...
MelasmaThe primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy, of D.O.S.E formulations in the treatment of melasma and cutaneous signs of aging.
Oral Tranexamic Acid and Topical Hydroquinone in the Treatment of Melasma
MelasmaThis study assess the effectiveness of oral tranexamic acid in combination with hydroquinone cream in the treatment of melasma.
Topical Composition Therapy (2013-MCN-333) for the Treatment of Melasma
MelasmaThe purpose of this research study is to gather information on the effectiveness and tolerability of a novel composition of existing U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved topical medications for the treatment of moderate to severe melasma.
Comparison of Chemical Peeling Agent With Transamine for Treatment of Melasma
MelasmaMelasma is an acquired skin disorder characterized by hyper-melanosis. Melasma is a term that originates from the Greek root "melas" (black color) and was formerly known as chloasma. Melasma is more common in sun-exposed tissues such as the cheeks, chin, upper lip, and forehead. Melasma is a common dermatological disorder with a frequency of 8.8 percent in the United States, but it can be as high as 40 percent amongst females. Melasma affects mostly ladies and is most common throughout their reproductive years . Melasma causes an increase in melanin pigment synthesis owing to a surge in the number of melanosomes, which are membrane-bound cell organelles inside melanocytes where melanin biosynthesis occurs and is transported to keratinocytes. Except in rare situations, the number of melanocytes will not be enhanced. Melanocytes will grow in size, and dendrites will become more visible. Despite the fact that the specific causation is unknown, some elements are thought to have a role in the pathophysiological mechanisms of melasma). Among these, sun exposure (UV light) is the most powerful primary trigger for its growth, which explains melisma's propensity for certain areas of the body. Other major determinants include genetic predisposition, and female hormones - both endogenous (that is, during pregnancy) and exogenous (that is, during pregnancy) (contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy). Thyroid problems, medications, and cosmetics can all be aggravating factors. Evaluation and prevention of triggering variables are essential in order to avoid recurrence . The peeling effect of glycolic acid is due to chemo exfoliation capabilities, that rely upon aiding the elimination of keratinocytes, resulting in melanin reduction and speeding up the regeneration of skin. TA suppresses UV-stimulated plasmin action in keratin cells by blocking plasminogen appending to the keratin cells, resulting from lower free arachidonic acid levels or to reduced capacity of prostaglandins production, which reduces melanocyte tyrosinase activity . The study's implications are to analyze the efficacy of these two drugs in order to assess the better outcome of patients with evidence-based management.
Comparison of Intralesional Tranexamic Acid and Platelets Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Melasma...
MelasmaABSTRACT Objective: To study the efficacy while comparing Intralesional tranexamic acid Vs Platelets rich plasma (PRP) in treatment of Melasma. Study design: Randomized-controlled trial (RCT). Study setting and duration: Dept of dermatology, CMH-Abbottabad, Nov-2022 /April-2023. Methodology: The sample size of 60 patients 20 to 40 years were calculated by using Openepi App. The informed consent was taken. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: Group A (30 patients injected with Intradermal Tranexamic acid (4mg/ml) and Group B (30 patients treated with PRP (1ml) intra-dermally, every fourth week for up to 12 weeks between both groups). The mMASI scale was used to evaluate all patients. The final evaluation was performed on the 24th week of follow-up. For analysis Statistical Package for the social sciences version-27 was used. To determine statistical significance a paired t-samples test with a p-value of < 0.05 was applied.
A Pilot Study Testing 1064nm Q-switch Laser Versus Glycolic Acid Peels for the Treatment of Melasma...
MelanosisThe purpose of this study is to find out the safety and effectiveness of 1064 Q-Switch Laser Therapy compared to Glycolic Acid Chemical Peels for the treatment of melasma.
Evaluation of an Herbal-Based De-Pigmenting System
MelasmaHyperpigmentationThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of an herbal de-pigmenting regimen applied to one side of the face compared with hydroquinone applied to the other side of the face in treating mottled hyperpigmentation and melasma.
Comparative Study of Dual Yellow Laser Versus Stabilized Kilnman Preparation in the Treatment of...
MelasmaRecent data highlight the role of vascularity in melasma and a recent study showed the interest to target this vascular component by pulsed dye laser. The Dual Yellow laser is a copper bromide laser emitting dual wavelength (green 511nm and yellow 578 nm). This laser can target both the vascular and pigmented components of melasma. A preliminary study has shown its efficacy and excellent tolerability in the treatment of melasma. This study requires however to be confirmed by a comparative study versus reference treatment. Main objective To compare the efficacy on melasma at 6 month post treatment of a Dual Yellow Laser preceded by 1 month of kilnman trio and the kilnman trio monotherapy for 3 months in an intra-patient study. Secondary objectives To study the frequency of PPI. Compare the rate and extent of recurrence 6 months after completion of treatment. To study the occurrence of possible adverse effects. Compare the effectiveness of Dual Yellow laser to kilnman trio monotherapy at S12 (end of treatment). To study patient satisfaction on the effectiveness and tolerability of the study treatments. Methods Monocentric prospective interventional randomized split face comparative study between experimental treatment versus reference treatment. Intervention Visit Selection Patients will be selected from those presenting to the consultation of the department of dermatology at University Hospital of Nice. Participation will be offered to patients corresponding to the selection criteria of the study. Visit V0: Inclusion and early treatment After a minimum of 15 days, patients will begin the study. This will ensure that patients signed informed consent. An initial clinical evaluation of melasma with calculation of MASI score and standardized photographs (see chapter 'assessment') will be made. An examination by confocal microscopy in vivo will be realized. All patients will receive treatment by stabilized kilnman trio for four weeks. In the week prior to Visit 1, the side of the face to receive the laser treatment will be determined by randomisation. Visit V1: (Week 4) Clinical evaluation of melasma with calculation of MASI score and photographs will be made. Possible side effects (including PPI) will be noted. The next trio will be treated with depigmenting kilnman trio for another 8 weeks. The contralateral side will receive its first laser session. Given the results of analysis by intention to treat, the occurrence of serious side effects will result in discontinuation of treatment but monitoring will continue with the assessments. Visit V2: (week 6) Clinical evaluation of melasma with calculation of MASI score and photographs will be made. Possible side effects (including PPI) will be noted. The laser side will receive its second session. Patients continue the applications of cream on the contralateral side. Visit V3 (week 9) Clinical evaluation of melasma with calculation of MASI score and photographs will be made. Possible side effects (including PPI) will be noted. The laser side will receive its third session.Patients continue the applications of cream on the contralateral side. Visit V4 (week 12) Clinical evaluation of melasma with calculation of MASI score and photographs will be made. Possible side effects (including PPI) will be noted. The laser side will receive its fourth and final session. Patients continue the applications of cream on the contralateral side during 4 weeks. Visit V5: (week 18) Clinical evaluation of melasma with calculation of MASI score and photographs will be made. Possible side effects (including PPI) will be noted. An assessment by in vivo confocal laser will be realized. Visit V6: (week 24) Clinical evaluation of melasma with calculation of MASI score and photographs will be made. Possible side effects (including PPI) will be noted. An assessment by in vivo confocal laser will be realized. Visit V7 (final week 36): Clinical evaluation of melasma with calculation of MASI score and photographs will be made. Possible side effects (including PPI) will be noted. An assessment by in vivo confocal laser will be realized. The evaluation of safety and patient satisfaction will be performed using a visual analog scale. The primary endpoint will be the MASI score, score approved for assessment of melasma treatments.
Comparison of Two Tri-Luma® Maintenance Regimens in the Treatment of Melasma
MelasmaMelasma is an acquired, symmetric, irregular hypermelanosis on sun-exposed areas of the face, commonly seen in Latin American women. It is a very frequent disease, although its true incidence is unknown. Melasma has historically been difficult to treat and therapy remains a challenge for this chronic condition. Melasma being a relapsing disease, there is a real need to address how to maintain efficacy achieved after acute treatment. A previous 12-month trial has shown that Tri-Luma® applied once daily over a long-term period is safe and tolerable. However, there are no robust data available either on the efficacy of Tri-Luma® in long-term treatment or guidance for a maintenance dosage regimen with this product. Investigations have been made through a feasibility work among Dermatologists from USA and Latin America to assess their current practice in terms of Maintenance Therapy. Two regimens appear to be prescribed frequently and will be compared in this study. The expectation is that Tri-Luma® will be effective, in one of the two regimens explored, in maintaining the Melasma improvement achieved with a previous treatment of Tri-Luma®.