Active clinical trials for "Menorrhagia"

The objective of this study is to determine the long-term safety of asoprisnil in women with abnormal uterine bleeding associated with uterine fibroids.

The objective of this study is to determine the long-term safety of asoprisnil in women with abnormal uterine bleeding associated with uterine fibroids.

The objective of this study is to determine the long-term safety of asoprisnil in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids who completed the 6 month Study C02-037.

The main objective of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of elagolix compared to placebo in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) associated with uterine fibroids in premenopausal women. The primary hypothesis is that elagolix, compared to placebo, reduces HMB associated with uterine fibroids in premenopausal women.

To assess the efficacy of a levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system as a treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding.

This is a study to learn more about a drug called Tranexamic acid (TA), otherwise known as Lysteda, and whether or not this drug can decrease menstrual blood loss in young women and lead to an increase in the quality of life. Menorrhagia in young women with bleeding disorders is typically treated with a combination of treatments including hormonal contraceptives. However, there are barriers to hormonal contraception use in younger adolescents. Tranexamic acid is taken orally during the first 5 days of menstrual bleeding. The purposes of this study include: To test the safety and efficacy of Lysteda in adolescent females. To learn how well Lysteda works in decreasing menstrual blood loss. To see if parents and children participating in this study think the drug is improving their quality of life. Lysteda has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in patients > than 18 years of age but not for younger patients.

The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of Test Product (Levosert) vs. Reference Product (Mirena® Bayer-Schering) based on the mean variation of menstrual blood loss volume in women with menorrhagia. The secondary objectives includes physical and gynaecological examinations, vital signs, clinical laboratory tests including hemoglobin and ferritin measurements, body weight and spontaneously reported adverse events were analysed and compared between Levosert and Mirena® treatment arms. Plasma levels of levonorgestrel (LNG) were also evaluated after various periods of time. The residual amounts of LNG in the devices were finally measured after withdrawal at completion of the study. Plasma levels of LNG and residual amounts of LNG were compared between the two treatment groups. Contraceptive effect of Levosert was estimated by Pearl Index.

Excessive menstrual loss (menorrhagia) is a common condition that affects women of reproductive age, and can result in anemia, chronic fatigue and lost wages from work. The traditional first line management involves treatment with oral contraceptives or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Many women ultimately undergo hysterectomy, a major operative procedure associated with increased costs, loss of feeling of womanhood, debilitating complications and on rare occasions, death. The newer global endometrial ablation (GEA) devices allow the destruction of the endometrial lining, without the removal of the uterus, in an ambulatory surgery setting. GEA offers a safe and effective alternative to hysterectomy with minimal risks and without unpleasant side-effects. Presently, global endometrial ablation is offered as an alternative to hysterectomy, after medical intervention has failed. This study will determine the role of global endometrial ablation in the initial management of menorrhagia. Women seeking treatment for menorrhagia will be randomized to either the medical treatment arm or the global endometrial ablation arm. This study will be the first to compare clinical efficacy and costs between oral contraceptive pills and global endometrial ablation in the initial management of menorrhagia and could potentially change the management of menorrhagia and impact millions of women who suffer from this condition.

This is a multi-center, single-arm, non-randomized, prospective clinical study. The clinical study is designed as a non-inferiority study to assess the effectiveness of the Aurora Endometrial Ablation System compared to an objective standard. Safety will be evaluated by determining the number and percentage of subjects who experience one or more of serious adverse events.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the use of the Aurora Ablation System in reducing menstrual blood loss at 12 months post-treatment. The occurrence of adverse events will be assessed along with an assessment of the reduction of uterine bleeding as measured by a pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBLAC) or menstrual diary.