Active clinical trials for "Metabolic Syndrome"

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether low-dose simvastatin in combination with ezetimibe in comparison to high-dose simvastatin alone, has a beneficial effect on the function of the endothelium after an oral fat load in patients with metabolic syndrome.

Identifying a simple dietary recommendation for weight loss and metabolic health may demonstrate potential for a simple public health message to impact coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention and metabolic syndrome. In a randomized clinical trial, the investigators propose to compare the efficacy of two intervention approaches to dietary change for CHD prevention among persons with metabolic syndrome. The two approaches are 1) the AHA Dietary Guidelines; and 2) a simple dietary change condition that focuses on increasing fiber. The investigators hypothesize that a message promoting high fiber intake may be the simple message that has potential to produce broad impact.

The purpose of this study is to determine if treating periodontal infections (gum disease) will reduce markers of systemic inflammation in patients at risk of cardiovascular diseases.

Metabolic Syndrome (MS) is an clinical condition with high cardiovascular risk. More than 80% of DM patients had MS. Dietary factors can be associated to both, DM and MS. Therefore the aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of add soluble fiber (goma-guar) in the usual diet of type 2 DM with MS and compare this intervention with an usual diet without this supplement.

To examine the effect of three different blood pressure medications on the insulin sensitivity in overweight patients with high blood pressure.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether MC-1 alone and in combination with an ACE inhibitor is effective in reducing blood pressure and metabolic dysfunctions associated with diabetes

An efficacy and safety study of ezetimibe (+) simvastatin compared to atorvastatin at week 6 in diabetics or metabolic syndrome patients in Korea.

This single-dose, randomized, open label, five-treatment, five-period, five-sequence crossover study was performed to assess pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of three new developed coated Glucose beads formulations (containing glucose (8 g) and caffeine), one coated Glucose beads formulation (containing glucose (8 g)) and one uncoated Glucose beads formulation (containing Glucose (8 g) and caffeine) after single-dose administration (fasting conditions) in 20 obese healthy subjects. After an overnight fasting of at least 10 hours the subjects were administered either glucose (8 g) or glucose (8 g) and caffeine starting at 8:00 (time 0; administration time was staggered beginning at 8:00 for the first group of subjects) in sitting position. At least 3 days wash-out period was kept between each treatment periods.

The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in the Elderly1 defines sarcopenia as a disorder of the progressive and generalized musculoskeletal system [1], which is associated with the increase and probability of adverse outcomes including falls, fractures, physical disability, and mortality [2]. what is associated with increased and likelihood of adverse outcomes including falls, fractures, disability physical and mortality [2]. For a long time, sarcopenia was associated with aging, affecting onlyold people. At present and after several research works related to fragility and theaging, it has been identified that the development of sarcopenia begins earlier in life [3], and that there are many contributing causes besides aging [4], [5]. This new knowledge has implications in the intervention of sarcopenia that prevents or delays its development. Sarcopenia is currently considered a muscle disease (muscle failure), based on adverse changes in the muscles of the musculoskeletal system accumulated throughout life, with loss of muscle strength such as main determinant [6], [7]. Sarcopenia has been overlooked in clinical practice, apparently due to to the complexity in determining the variables to be measured, how to measure them, and the values or cut-off points can guide diagnosis and treatment, and how best to assess the effects of therapeutic intervention [8]. In terms economic, the presence of sarcopenia increases the risk of hospitalization and increases the cost of care during hospital admission [9]. Diabetes is the main cause of non-traumatic amputation of the lower limb (MI), being foot ulcers diabetic the cause of 80% of the amputations of people with diabetes[10]. A study conducted by the Chongqing University Hospital showed that sarcopenia is independently related to the foot diabetic and that patients with diabetic foot have a worse prognosis if they suffer from sarcopenia. HYPOTHESIS: The surface electromyography (EMGs) signal recording of the foot musculature, will allow extracting biomarkers that allow monitoring and follow-up of sarcopenia in diabetic patients. MAIN OBJECTIVES: 1- Generate tools based on artificial intelligence (AI) using the database with the biomarkers obtained, in order to analyze the predisposing and triggering risk factors associated with diabetic foot ulcers, according to the IWGDF2. 2- Describe the profile of the diabetic patient in terms of degree of sarcopenia with respect to the population without diabetes in a group of adults. DESIGN: Observational study comparison between cases and controls: a group with the presence of Diabetes Mellitus and another without. SAMPLE: Approximately 16% of diabetic patients will develop an ulcer during their evolution and the Annual incidence is 2-3%, which doubles to 6% in the presence of polyneuropathy. Population of the Department of Health 168,978. Prevalence of diabetes in Spain 7.8%. It is estimated that there are 13,182 in the department people with diabetes. Confidence level 95%, expected frequency of ulcers 6% and confidence limit 9%, it was calculates the sample of 26 patients. 30 patients per group will be recruited. GROUP 1: 30 patients with Diabetes Mellitus. GROUP 2: 30 control patients without Diabetes Mellitus. The period of inclusion of patients is estimated at 5 months. METHOD: the assessment interventions will be carried out in two days. During the first visit, examination to identify risk to the foot: clinical history (PA, comorbidity data, previous injuries to the feet). feet..), examination of the vascular state, examination of loss of protective sensitivity, perception of pressure, skin inspection, inspection of bone/joint structures, physical limitations and level of knowledge of the foot care. During the second visit: diagnostic tests for sarcopenia (bioimpedance and electromyography), arthropometric measurements, malnutrition, dependence and activity marker tests. EXPECTED RESULTS: clarify some aspects related to the sarcopenia-diabetic foot binomial, and isolate risk factors for future prevention, by obtaining biomarkers with EMGs in lower limbs.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent form of arthritis. Its pathogenesis remains poorly understood. Though historically regarded as a disease of mechanical degeneration, it is now appreciated that inflammation plays an important role in OA pathogenesis