Active clinical trials for "Migraine Disorders"

The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether erenumab is safe and well tolerated in healthy adults and migraine patients. As part of the secondary objectives, this study will be conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of erenumab after single subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) doses in healthy participants and migraine patients as well as to characterize the effect of erenumab on the capsaicin-induced increase in dermal blood flow after single SC or IV doses in healthy participants and migraine patients.

The purpose of this study is to determine if milnacipran taken twice daily is effective in reduction of headache pain.

Primary Objective: - To compare the treatment groups in the reduction of pain score by at least 30 mm on a visual pain scale (VAS) at 60 minutes after study medication intake, compared to the baseline score (obtained before the study medication intake). Secondary Objectives: To assess the proportion of patients with more than 50% pain relief, according to the VAS score at 45 minutes after study medication intake compared to baseline Determine the following aspects in the timing of study medication intake: Time to the first perception of pain relief Time to onset of meaningful pain relief Reduction of pain at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120 and 240 minutes after study medication intake, to be evaluated as the difference between the scores on VAS in each period and baseline To assess the pain according to the five items of Headache Relief Rating - HRR (0: strong worsening 1: slight worsening 2: no change 3: slight improvement 4: strong improvement) at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after study medication intake, according to the diaries completed by the patients To check the proportion of the patients requiring the third tablet of study medication within 24 hours of starting the study treatment and when it occurred To check the timing and frequency of rescue medication intake, as well as the proportion of patients who used these medications within 24 hours of starting the treatment Safety assessment.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MK-6096 versus placebo for preventing migraines in participants with episodic migraine. After a 28-day Screening period during which baseline number of monthly migraine days was assessed, participants were randomized to receive MK-6096 or placebo for a 12-week Treatment Period. Participants who completed all 12 weeks of the Treatment Period received drug or placebo for an additional 2 weeks in the Run-out Period. Treatment assignment in the Run-out Period was determined at the initial randomization. In the Run-out Period, participants who received placebo in the Treatment Period continued to receive placebo and participants who received MK-6096 in the Treatment Period 2 received either MK-6096 or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. The hypothesis tested in the study is that MK-6096 10 mg is superior to placebo in reducing migraine frequency as measured by the mean change from baseline in monthly migraine days averaged over the 12- week treatment period.

Primary objective: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of tonabersat compared to placebo in the prophylaxis of migraine headache and to evaluate the longer term tolerability of tonabersat in an open label extension. Secondary objective(s): To obtain further data on the efficacy and dose response of tonabersat; To extend the safety and tolerability database of tonabersat; To obtain data on the pharmacokinetics of tonabersat.

Background: The therapy with pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEFs) has been used as a therapeutic modality for at least 40 years. However, their effect in the migraine prophylaxis is unclear. Objectives: Evaluate the prophylactic effectiveness of the therapy with PEFs in the handling of migraines. Methodology: Placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, crossed clinical study.

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the use of prochlorperazine and ketorolac in combination lead in a larger reduction in pain score compared to prochlorperazine alone when treating pediatric migraine in the Emergency Department (ED). Our hypothesis is that this combination of medications treats not only the pain but also the associated gastrointestinal symptoms of migraine. The main outcome of this study is the reduction in the patient's pain score at 60 minutes from administration of the study medications. Secondary outcomes include the number of patients achieving complete resolution of the headache while in the ED, the number of patients requiring additional treatment interventions by the treating physician, the number of patients with resolution of the associated symptoms like nausea, vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia, the recurrence of headache in the 48-72 hours after discharge, and side effects of the medications.

Overall trial objectives: Can treatment with tonabersat reduce the number of days with a migraine headache in patients who suffer from frequent migraine attacks How well tolerated is treatment with tonabersat The study is based on the hypothesis that the unique mechanism of action of tonabersat will inhibit some of the early events in the generation of migraine and so be effective as prophylactic treatment

Phase I, Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single Dose Study to Evaluate the Blockade of CGRP Receptor by AMG 334 in Preventing PACAP-38 Induced Migraine-like Attacks in Migraine Patients.

Overall trial objectives: Can treatment with tonabersat reduce the number of days with aura and/or migraine headache in patients with migraine with aura How well tolerated is treatment with tonabersat The study is based on the hypothesis that the unique mechanism of action of tonabersat will inhibit some of the early events in the generation of aura and migraine headache and so be effective as prophylactic treatment