search

Active clinical trials for "Glioma"

Results 51-60 of 1149

Safusidenib Phase 2 Study in IDH1 Mutant Glioma

Glioma

This is a Phase 2, multicenter, open label, two parts, clinical study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and PK of safusidenib. Patients with recurrent or progressive histologically confirmed IDH1 mutant WHO Grade 2/3 glioma10 outside Japan, will be enrolled in this study. It was divided into 2 parts. Part 1: Up to 25 patients will be randomized 1:1:1:1:1 (5 patients per group) to receive one of the daily oral doses of safusidenib at 125 mg twice a day (BID), 250 mg BID, 500 mg once daily (QD), 375 mg BID, or 500 mg BID. The PK characteristics and safety and initial efficacy data will be assessed in Part 1. Part 2: It is planned to open 2 glioma subtype cohorts: Grade 2 and Grade 3 glioma cohorts with 30 eligible patients enrolled in each cohort. Total 60 patients will be enrolled. Part 2 is to evaluate the efficacy of safusidenib in the treatment of recurrent/progressive WHO CNS Grade 2 and grade 3 IDH1 mutant glioma. Exploratory Surgery Cohort: This cohort will be conducted in parallel with Part 2, for explorative purpose once RP2D is decided. 5 patients with primarily enhancing lesions and other 5 with primarily non-enhancing lesions will be enrolled. Participants will receive oral safusidenib treatment continuously, with 28 days as a cycle, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, start of new anti-cancer therapy, investigator decision or death, upon whichever earlier. Besides baseline, the anti-tumor response will be evaluated every 8 weeks following RANO or RANO-LGG criteria as applicable, until disease progression, consent withdrawal or death, upon whichever earlier.

Recruiting57 enrollment criteria

Use of Pulsed Low-dose Rate Re-irradiation for Recurrent Glioma (PULSAR)

Glioma

Re-irradiation in gliomas is a therapeutic option at recurrence before of 2nd-line chemotherapy. The dose of re-irradiation with conventional fractionation is unfortunately limited by the risk of symptomatic radionecrosis that is significant for cumulative doses above 100 Gy. The use of unconventional low dose rate pulsed radiotherapy (pLDRT) can reduce the risk of radiotoxicity while taking advantage of the cellular hyper-radiosensitivity that occurs at low dose-rates. The present study therefore aims at evaluating whether the use of pLDRT in the re-irradiation of recurrences of gliomas allows maintaining a low risk of symptomatic radionecrosis even for cumulative doses greater than 100 Gy.

Recruiting10 enrollment criteria

Pediatric Low Grade Glioma - MEKinhibitor TRIal vs Chemotherapy

Grade 1 GliomaMixed Glio-neuronal Tumors1 more

Pediatric low-grade glioma (PLGG) is a heterogeneous group of WHO grade I and II brain tumors, associated with a 10-year overall survival of 90%. It is the most common form of primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor arising during childhood, adolescence and young adulthood, accounting for over 30% of CNS tumors in this age group. A large group of PLGG patients will benefit from a complete resection of their tumor. Nevertheless, PLGG can occur anywhere and can be in some locations associated with neurological symptoms, unresectable or radiological progressive tumors that need medical treatments rapidly to avoid long-term sequelae. The current problem during this first line therapy is to improve tumor response, overall survival rate, as well as progression free survival. In our study, we will focus on a specific group of PLGGs without any congenital NF1 mutation and with a wild-type BRAF gene in the tumor. In this subgroup, for instance, the PFS is not increasing anymore above 50% at 3 years independently from the chemotherapeutic scheme. The two current standard therapies are carboplatin plus vincristine during 81 weeks or a weekly IV administration of vinblastine during 70 weeks. The most recent Canadian approach with vinblastine seems to have the same PFS rate, but with a better daily tolerance and less toxicities than the carboplatin/vincristine combination. Therefore, it is becoming the new standard approach in those patients. Nevertheless, we need to improve more their outcome with less recurs and a better first-line tumor response. The recent molecular discoveries involving the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in those PLGG is opening a new era with specific targeted therapies that might be the key to improve their survivals and giving hope to less treatment lines and a better tumor response. Therefore, we designed a prospective open randomized phase II study, named PLGG-MEKTRIC, comparing the experimental arm (a daily MEK inhibitor, Trametinib, Mekinist©) to a standard arm comprising weekly vinblastine during 18 courses of 4 weeks each. The study will enroll 134 patients with a PLGG during childhood, adolescence or young adulthood with no NF1-related disease and without any BRAFv600 mutation located in brain or spine. 67 patients, in each treatment arm, are planned to be enrolled to answer our primary objective. This primary objective will be to determine in the experimental arm a 20% superiority of the 3-year PFS rate in comparison with the standard treatment administered during 18 courses (e.g. 72 weeks). A stratification of the patients will be done in both arms based on molecular tumor results and brain/spine locations to obtain two equivalent arms to be analyzed. The recruitment time will be 36 months and the complete follow-up of each patient will last 3 years. The secondary objectives will be in both arms: the tumor response rate at 24 and 72 weeks of treatment, the 3-year PFS and OS rates and the frequency of AE/SAE/SUSAR (Adverse Event/Serious Adverse Event) based on CTCAE criteria during the 3 years after the first administration. A Quality of Life (QoL) assessment, based on PEDsQL questionnaires, at 24 weeks, at the end of treatment and 3 years after 1st treatment administration in both arms will be part of this study. Finally, 3-year PFS and OS will be analyzed according to molecular biomarkers and visual assessment (LogMar scale) in each arm. An economic analysis is also planned as an ancillary study to determine a cost effectiveness of the best arm and complementary ancillary molecular studies are already organized. In the future, we hope to push forward this new-targeted therapy as a referenced first line treatment of pediatric PLGG to obtain the best tolerance and positive long-term impact and to extend our knowledge of MEK inhibitor impact in molecular subgroups and in optical pathway locations. We also plan to do a "switch" strategy in patients relapsing in standard arm and we will propose systematically to those patients the experimental treatment (MEK inhibitor ).

Recruiting35 enrollment criteria

Safety and Tolerability of Fb-PMT in Recurrent Glioblastoma

GliomaMalignant

Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive and fatal form of primary malignant brain tumor with limited treatment options. fb-PMT affects a large group of cancer cell signaling pathways and thus may be effective in heterogeneous, treatment-resistant tumors such as Glioblastoma. fb-PMT also is actively transported across the blood-brain barrier into the brain. This study is being conducted to determine the dose level for further clinical development of fb-PMT to treat recurrent Glioblastoma.

Recruiting32 enrollment criteria

A Phase 2 Study of Sonodynamic Therapy Using SONALA-001 and Exablate 4000 Type 2.0 in Patients With...

Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma

The primary objectives of this trial are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of sonodynamic therapy (SDT) using SONALA-001 and Exablate Type 2.0 device and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) energy in combination with SONALA-001 in subjects with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma Funding Source - FDA OOPD

Recruiting50 enrollment criteria

Trial of Niraparib in Participants With Newly-diagnosed Glioblastoma and Recurrent Glioma

GlioblastomaGlioblastoma Multiforme5 more

This is an open-label, multi-center Phase 0 study with an expansion phase that will enroll up to 24 participants with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma and up to 18 recurrent glioma participants with IDH mutation and ATRX loss. The trial will be composed of a Phase 0 component (subdivided into Arm A and B) and a therapeutic expansion phase. Patients with tumors demonstrating a positive PK Response (in Arm A) or a positive PD Response (in Arm B) of the Phase 0 component of the study will graduate to a therapeutic expansion phase that combines therapeutic dosing of niraparib plus standard-of-care fractionated radiotherapy (in Arm A) or niraparib monotherapy (in Arm B) until progression of disease.

Recruiting44 enrollment criteria

Multiple Doses of Neural Stem Cell Virotherapy (NSC-CRAd-S-pk7) for the Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade...

Recurrent Anaplastic AstrocytomaRecurrent Anaplastic Oligoastrocytoma6 more

This phase I trial studies the effect of multiple doses of NSC-CRAd-S-pk7 in treating patients with high-grade gliomas that have come back (recurrent). NSC-CRAd-S-pk7 consists of neural stem cells that carry a virus, which can kill cancer cells. Giving multiple doses of NSC-CRAd-S-pk7 may kill more tumor cells.

Recruiting31 enrollment criteria

Radiation Therapy With Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide Versus Radiation Therapy With Adjuvant...

Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors

Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether giving radiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiation with adjuvant PCV is more effective in treating anaplastic glioma or low grade glioma.

Recruiting42 enrollment criteria

Study of Liposomal Curcumin in Combination With RT and TMZ in Patients With Newly Diagnosed High-Grade...

Glioblastoma

The objective of this study is to assess the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of Liposomal Curcumin (LC) in combination with radiotherapy (RT) and Temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with newly diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas (HGG).

Recruiting25 enrollment criteria

Safety and Efficacy of the PAINLESS Nerve Growth Factor CHF6467 in Optic Pathway Glioma (OPG)

Optic Pathway Glioma

Infantile optic pathway glioma (OPG) is generally benign and slow-growing, but due to infiltration and compression of sensitive neuronal structures in the optical pathways, progressive visual loss is a frequent and highly debilitating complication of the condition. Recently, therapeutic strategies aimed at neuroprotection in the visual pathway rather than reducing the size of the tumor have been studied. Nerve growth factor (NGF) is a neurotrophin that acts on peripheral and central neurons by binding with high affinity to the trkANGFR receptor, which has tyrosine kinase activity, and with low affinity to the non-selective pan-neurotrophin receptor p75NTR that regulates signaling through trkANGFR. The effect of NGF on target cells depends on the ratio of these two co-distributed receptors on the cell surface. Recently, two studies have shown that murine NGF can prevent progression of visual damage in OPG patients. These successful exploratory studies (the last of which was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study) represent a significant reference point in the field of vision loss in OPG patients and provide the basis and rationale for this study using a recombinant form of mutated NGF, painless NGF (CHF6467), which is anticipated to prove devoid of adverse effects related to pain at therapeutic doses. The purpose of this randomised study is to assess the safety and efficacy of multiple doses of painless NGF CHF6467 eye drops on the visual function of children or young adults with optic pathway gliomas, whether or not associated with type 1 neurofibromatosis. This study will include serial assessments of both optical pathway functionality and morphology, using electrophysiological and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques of the brain. The comparator will be a placebo preparation based on a physiologically balanced salt solution. This comparator has no effect on retinal function and optic nerve, is painless and perfectly tolerated, as reported by numerous clinical studies including that of our group.

Recruiting4 enrollment criteria
1...567...115

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs