Active clinical trials for "Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2"

There is a potential link between diabetes mellitus (DM) and severity of osteoarthritis .Type 2 diabetes is a part of the metabolic syndrome (Mets) accompanied by ageing and mechanical stress are also a risk factor to osteoarthritis. Every anatomical component of the joint demonstrated faster joint deterioration and elevated inflammation at microcellular environment of individuals with DM. Normal chondrocytes capacity to adapt to the local glucose level is impaired by OA and there is a significant risk of glucose toxicity and increased glucose absorption. The most dependable and effective treatment for mild to early joint osteoarthritis is exercise. Active free exercises i.e. Buerger Allen exercises are used as a conservative perfusion therapy because they rely on how gravity affects the smooth muscles in the valves. Synovial fluid supports the joint's ability to recover while also reducing inflammation and enhancing overall joint function. The aim of the study is to determine the effect of Buerger Allen exercise and low intensity high repetition exercises on pain, range of motion and disability in knee osteoarthritis with type 2 diabetes. The study would be randomized controlled trial. Total thirty-six subjects will be assigned randomly by using lottery randomization into two groups. Group A will receive conventional therapy and an additional Buerger Allen exercise while Group B will be a control group receiving only baseline treatment. Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), Ankle Brachial Index, KOOS and Goniometer will be used as outcome measure tools for pain, range of motion and disability. Measure will be taken at baseline and at the end of treatment session. The collected data will be analyzed in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 25.0.If data will be normally distributed then parametric if not normally distributed than non-parametric

This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, escalating single-dose and multiple-dose study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of HEC88473 injection in healthy subjects, obese subjects and subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

This is a multiple dose study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, and PD of K-757 and K-833 when co-administered in overweight/obese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

The study will develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a team-based follow-up program in general practice (GP) among people with chronic conditions.

The reason for this study is to compare the effect of the study drug tirzepatide to semaglutide on blood sugar levels in participants with type 2 diabetes. The study will last approximately 47 weeks and may include about 12 visits.

Communal coping consists of the appraisal of a problem as shared and collaboration to manage the problem. Among individuals with type 2 diabetes, self-report, daily diary, and observational measures of communal coping have been linked to better relationship and health outcomes. While communal coping has been linked to positive adjustment outcomes, there are no interventions that incorporate both components of communal coping theory; interventions often focus on collaborative strategies but do not emphasize a shared appraisal. However, focusing on the shared appraisal component of communal coping may be the critical component to affect change. The primary goal of this study will be to design an intervention that fosters both a shared appraisal and collaboration in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The second goal is to explore two potential mechanisms that may drive the links of the intervention to outcomes-perceived emotional responsiveness and self-efficacy.

This study looks at the way a new medicine tablet called semaglutide moves in and throughout the body over time. It will also look at if the medicine is safe and the body can accept it. The new medicine is planned to treat diabetes. The aim of the study is to see how semaglutide tablets work in healthy people who are Chinese. Participants will either get oral semaglutide tablets or placebo (dummy) tablets - which treatment is decided by chance. The tablet form of semaglutide is a new medicine that cannot be prescribed. Doctors can prescribe semaglutide as an injection only. It is for the treatment of diabetes in some countries. Participants will get 1 tablet per day for 12 weeks (84 days). Participants will get 1 tablet a day to take with up to half a glass of water (maximum 120 mL). Participants must take the tablet first thing in the morning on an empty stomach (water is allowed until 2 hours before taking the tablet). After taking the tablet, participants must not eat or drink anything for at least 30 minutes. After 30 minutes, they can have their first meal of the day and take any other medicines they may need, such as birth control tablets, routine vitamins and use of paracetamol at times.

The study compares 2 medicines for type 2 diabetes: oral semaglutide (a new medicine) and placebo (a dummy medicine). Researchers will test semaglutide to see how well it works compared to placebo. The study will also test if semaglutide is safe. Participants will either get semaglutide or placebo - which treatment is decided by chance. Participants will get 1 tablet a day to take with up to half a glass of water. Participants must take the tablet first thing in the morning on an empty stomach. After taking the tablet, participants must not eat or drink anything for at least 30 minutes. After the 30 minutes, participants can have their first meal of the day and take any other medicines they may need. The study will last for about 8 months (36 weeks). Participants will have 9 clinic visits and 2 phone calls with the study doctor. At all 9 of the clinic visits, participants will have blood samples taken. At 5 of the clinic visits, participants must arrive fasting. This means they cannot eat for 8 hours before the visit. It is fine to drink water up to 2 hours before the visit. This is for some of the blood samples that will be taken at the visit. Women cannot take part if pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant during the study period.

BEYOND represents an open-label, parallel, three-arm randomized controlled trial, aimed at evaluating the effects of combination therapy of fixed ratio basal insulin/GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) or basal insulin/SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) on the durability of the glycemic control, as compared with the basal bolus insulin regimen, in people with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycemic targets with injective therapy. The potential benefits for participants in the study include the possibility of improving the glyco-metabolic control with drugs that have been evaluated as safe and protective for the heart and the kidneys. The primary outcome of the study is the mean HbA1c change between groups at six months. Participants in the study will be followed for subsequent 18 months in order to evaluate the durability of glycemic control and the chenge of other secondary outcomes.

This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool for patients with COPD, asthma, diabetes mellitus type 2 or heart failure (and any combination of these conditions) in real-life routine practice. The ABCC-tool consists of a questionnaire, a visualisation using balloons that is based on cut-off points, and treatment advice. The ABCC-tool is intended to be used in daily healthcare practice, is designed to monitor a patient's integrated health status over time, to facilitate shared decision making, and to stimulate self-management. The study has a pragmatic clustered quasi-experimental design with two arms. The intervention group will use the ABCC-tool and the control group will receive usual care. The study will be implemented at a general practice-level, and has a follow-up period of 18 months. The primary outcome is change in perceived quality of care, as measured with the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC), as compared to usual care after 18 months. It is hypothesized that the change in perceived quality of care is significantly higher in the group using the ABCC-tool as compared to the group that receives usual care. Additionally the implementation of the ABCC-tool in general practices will be evaluated in 12 general practices. The implementation study will evaluate the context of caregivers with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, the process of implementation with the RE-AIM framework, and fidelity to the intervention with the fidelity framework.