Active clinical trials for "Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2"

This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of the trial is to investigate the pharmacokinetics (the exposure of the trial drug in the body), pharmacodynamics (the effect of the investigated drug on the body), and the safety and tolerability of semaglutide in healthy male Japanese and Caucasian subjects.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by progressive deterioration in the function of the pancreatic beta-cells, which are the cells that produce and secrete insulin (the hormone primarily responsible for the handling of glucose in the body). The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to determine whether intermittent intensive insulin therapy is an effective therapeutic strategy that can preserve pancreatic beta-cell function and maintain glycemic control early in the course of type 2 diabetes.

The goal of this study is to demonstrate that leucine in combination with a low does of metformin can serve as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve blood glucose levels in type 2 diabetic subjects. This study will compare three doses of a leucine-metformin combination to the standard metformin dose in controlling blood glucose levels in type 2 diabetic patients.

This study is going to assess the safety and tolerability of PF-06291874 in adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus as monotherapy, to evaluate the significance of overall glycemic control in these subjects.

Premixed insulin-based therapy is a standard insulin treatment strategy in Austria. The widespread use of premixed insulin is explained by high acceptance by health care professionals and patients due to one single product and flexible number of injections (1-3 daily) which covers the demand in controlling fasting and postprandial glucose excursions of most patients with diabetes. However, the use of pre-mixed insulin frequently leads to a high insulin demand and consequently weight gain and an increased risk of hypoglycemia. Hence, achieve good metabolic control in these patients remains a major challenge. For those patients, the approach to treatment intensification without facing the typical risks of insulin treatment (hypoglycemia and weight increase) is of major importance. One, so far not exploited option may be the BIT-strategy: Basal insulin in combination with incretin-based therapy. Pathophysiologically basal insulin inhibits glucose production in the liver, decreases hepatic insulin resistance and improves the function of beta cells in the postprandial state by discharge of fasting insulin secretion. During further diabetes progression steadily increasing HbA1c levels - despite good fasting blood glucose control - indicate the need for additional intervention of meal-related glucose excursions. In this stage of type-2 diabetes basal insulin can be combined with prandial (short-acting) insulin or prandial GLP-1 receptor agonists. However, regarding important safety parameters: risks of hypoglycemia and weight gain in the long-term treatment GLP-1 receptor agonists are beneficial. Lixisenatide is a novel GLP-1 receptor agonist with a pronounced postprandial (PPG) effect which fits with basal insulin mode of action primarily focused on fasting blood glucose reduction. Therefore 10 patients (both gender) under treatment with premixed insulin (2-3 times daily) and HbA1c>7% will be switched to basal insulin glargine (Lantus, once daily) and GLP-1 receptor agonist Lixisenatide (Lyxumia, once daily). The investigators hypothesize that switching from a therapy based on premixed insulin to a simple, once daily administered combination of basal insulin plus a GLP-1 receptor agonist in patients with type-2 diabetes not achieving therapeutic target (HbA1c>7%) is clinically feasable in an out patient setting

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effects of canagliflozin on plasma volume and renal parameters in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus who are currently taking metformin and being treated for high blood pressure.

This study will evaluate the effect of the addition of metformin once daily (q.d.) or twice daily (b.i.d.) to sitagliptin monotherapy in Japanese participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who have inadequate glycemic control with diet/exercise therapy and sitagliptin monotherapy. The primary hypotheses are that the addition of metformin 250 mg b.i.d. or metformin 500 mg q.d. is superior to the addition of placebo on the change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 24 weeks and that the addition of metformin 500 mg q.d. is non-inferior to the addition of metformin 250 mg b.i.d. on the change from baseline in HbA1c at 24 weeks.

In this study the investigators aim to evaluate the impact of a community pharmacy-based program to educate type 2 diabetic patients about medications, life style and self-care.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagonlike peptide-1 (GLP-1) mimetics or analogs, which rely on the gastrointestinal hormones that are part of the incretin system for the treatment of T2DM, provide a therapeutic alternative to common oral antihyperglycemic agents (eg, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones). Although GLP-1 analogs and DPP-4 inhibitor medications are effective, there are differences between these products, including method of administration (injectable versus oral). Previous studies have shown that patients prefer additional oral agents over injectable agents because of fear of injections and the desire to avoid them. Patient preference is both clinically and financially important, as it can have long-term implications in terms of patients' motivation and insight into their disease state and its treatment, which might have a direct impact on the patient's compliance and treatment adherence. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the proportion of T2DM patients preferring oral anti-diabetic treatment with vildagliptin + metformin versus an injectable anti-diabetic treatment with liraglutide after 4 weeks of treatment with each medication.

This project tests a model of chronic disease medication management in which the decision to initiate or adjust medical therapy is directly linked to a sequence of subsequent clinical actions (e.g. monitoring for adverse drug events, assessing response to therapy, changing medication dose) performed independently of the office visit. The investigators hypothesize that establishing a visit-independent, health information technology (IT) supported cycle of laboratory monitoring and iterative medication dose adjustment will result in more effective chronic disease care.