Active clinical trials for "Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2"

This study enrolled participants with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) despite non-insulin antidiabetic therapy in addition to diet and exercise, and would have benefited from additional control of blood glucose levels. The study assessed the metabolic effects of ranolazine, including its effect in lowering glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and lowering glucose while fasting, and following a meal (postprandial). Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ranolazine or placebo, and were stratified by HbA1c ≤ 7.5% or > 7.5%. Enrollment was to include no more than two-thirds of participants with baseline HbA1c ≤ 7.5%. Other than glucose values, efficacy endpoint results remained blinded during the study; for safety purposes, the investigator was to be alerted of severe hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia. Participants were instructed to maintain logs of their physical activity/exercise (Subject Activity Assessment) and study drug dosing (Dosing Log).

This trial is conducted in Europe, and North and South America. The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate if the two treatments are equally effective.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (what the body does to the medication) and pharmacodynamics (what the medication does to the body) of treatment with JNJ-41443532 relative to treatment with placebo in type 2 diabetes mellitus participants.

The objective of the current study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of linagliptin (5mg / once daily) given for 52 weeks as add-on therapy to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and insufficient glycaemic control despite diet, exercise, and treatment with one approved antidiabetic drug.

Primary Objective: To evaluate the change in plasma levels of adiponectin and Asymmetric Dimethylarginine (ADMA) in type 2 diabetes patients after 12 weeks of treatment with Amaryl-M Secondary Objectives: To assess the role of Amaryl-M in the change of plasma levels of adiponectin and ADMA in type 2 diabetes patients after 8 weeks of therapy To evaluate the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) change after 8 and 12 weeks of therapy with Amaryl-M To evaluate the efficacy of Amaryl-M in the improvement of patients glycemic level (Fasting blood glucose (FBG) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c)) To evaluate the change of Tumor Necrosis Factor - Alfa (TNF-Alfa) after 12 weeks of therapy with Amaryl-M To evaluate the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) change after 12 weeks of therapy with Amaryl-M To evaluate the HOMA-β change after 12 weeks of therapy with Amaryl-M To evaluate the relationship between adiponectin and ADMA level with FBG or HbA1c level

The purpose of this study is to assess whether 4-months of interval-walking exercise training improves glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The effects of interval-walking training will be compared to continuous-walking exercise in a randomised, controlled trial design. Changes in glycemic control will be examined using oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) with stable isotope methodology. In addition, insulin sensitivity and secretion will be examined using glucose clamps combined with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP).

This study is to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy after concomitant administration of ASP1941 and α-glucosidase inhibitor in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of insulin pump therapy versus multiple daily injections in insulin-taking type 2 Diabetes Mellitus who are sub optimally controlled with multiple daily injections (MDI).

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and the safety of sitagliptin and glimepiride in drug naïve elderly patients with Type 2 diabetes as evaluated by HbA1c change from baseline at 52 W as efficacy and incidence of hypoglycemia from randomization to 52 W as safety. The clinical hypotheses are non-inferiority of sitagliptin to glimepiride in efficacy as judged by HbA1c change from baseline at 52 W and superiority of sitagliptin to glimepiride in safety as judged by incidence of hypoglycemia in drug naïve elderly patients with T2DM. In addition, comparison of efficacy is extended to 104 W.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin, once daily (QD) combined with an α-glucosidase inhibitor taken three times daily (TID) in type 2 diabetic patients with uncontrolled blood glucose.