Active clinical trials for "Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2"

The purpose of the study was to compare Humalog (insulin lispro)-recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) or Novolog (insulin aspart)-rHuPH20 to insulin lispro for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in basal-bolus therapy.

Phase 3 study to Evaluate cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with ITCA 650.

Warfarin is a commonly used drug to prevent the blood from clotting. The purpose of this study is to determine if dulaglutide (LY2189265) affects how warfarin works. The study involves two different treatments (Treatment 1: warfarin; Treatment 2: dulaglutide + warfarin) separated by a minimum washout period of 24 days. In Treatment 1, the participant will receive 10 milligrams (mg) of warfarin on Day 1. In Treatment 2, the participant will receive a 1.5-mg dose of dulaglutide (LY2189265) as an injection on Day 1 and then a 10 mg dose of warfarin on Day 3. Participants will be randomly assigned into different treatment sequences. Participants in Treatment Sequence A will receive Treatment 1 then Treatment 2. Participants in Treatment Sequence B will receive Treatment 2 then Treatment 1.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate EndoBarrier Gastrointestinal Liner in the post marketing environment in subjects who are obese and have Type 2 Diabetes.

The current study investigates Welchol as monotherapy to improve glycemic control in subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus not adequately controlled with diet and exercise alone. The study will evaluate if Welchol monotherapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus will be safe, well tolerated and efficacious.

This is a clinical trial designed to assess the cardiovascular outcome of long-term treatment with sitagliptin used as part of usual care compared to usual care without sitagliptin in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) having a history of cardiovascular (CV) disease and a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 6.5% to 8.0%. Primary hypothesis A is that sitagliptin, when used as part of usual care, is non-inferior to usual care without sitagliptin with regard to the risk of developing a confirmed event in the primary CV composite endpoint of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) plus. If hypothesis A is satisfied: hypothesis B is that sitagliptin, when used as part of usual care, is superior to usual care without sitagliptin with regard to the risk of developing a confirmed event in the primary CV composite endpoint.

The purpose of this study is to determine if daily supplementation with 2000 International Units of Vitamin D will improve hemoglobin A1c in uncontrolled type 2 diabetics.

Many women come into pregnancy with diabetes that is controlled with either Metformin or diet control; however, the current standard of care for the treatment of preexisting diabetes in pregnancy is insulin. Metformin is widely used in the non-pregnant population for glycemic control, and has been used in pregnancy for other indications without adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. What remains unproven is the ability of Metformin to adequately control glucose in women during pregnancy. Our goal is to randomize 100 women who enter pregnancy with diabetes that is controlled by either diet or an oral agent and women who are found to have an abnormal glucose challenge test at less than 20 weeks to either standard treatment with weight based Regular and neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin or Metformin. Our hypothesis is that Metformin will provide glycemic control that is equivalent to insulin in these women.

Compare the glycemic and insulinemic responses of a standard nutritional product with two diabetes-specific nutritional products in patients with type 2 diabetes.

This trial is conducted in Europe. The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate whether differences exist between three different concentrations of the drug, NN9535, administered in healthy male subjects in equal doses.