Active clinical trials for "Mouth, Edentulous"

Fifty six patients were randomly enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly stratified into two control groups and two test groups, from which conventional pick up and digital impressions were made respectively. Patients of group 1 (CIG Axial) and 3 (DIG Axial) received 4 axial implants whereas, group 2 patients (CIG Tilted), and group 4 (DIG Tilted) received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants. All participants received hybrid dentures. Bone loss, implant loss, maintenance of prosthesis were evaluated at 6m,12m, and 24 months follow up period.

Main aim of this study was to assess survival rates of short implants with a length of 4 mm in the edentulous mandible after 1, 3, and 5 years.

A randomized clinical trial (RCT) was designed. Fourteen completely edentulous participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups. All participants received two implants in the inter-foraminal area with ball attachments. Participants in the control group were rehabilitated with conventionally manufactured Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) maxillary complete denture and mandibular implant overdentures while participants in intervention group received digital light processed (DLP)-printed photo-polymerizable PMMA Nextdent maxillary complete denture and mandibular implant overdentures. Follow-up appointments were scheduled at 3,6, and 12 months where data of Oral Health Impact Profile 19(OHIPEDENT19) was used to assess the OHRQoL (oral health related quality of life). In addition, denture retention was measured using digital force gauge device. Data were collected and statistically analyzed.

The purpose of this study is to investigate denture satisfaction following the conversion of existing mandibular complete dentures to implant-overdentures (IOD) in very old edentulous patients who depend on help for activities of daily living (ADL) and evaluate secondary endpoints such as functional, structural, nutritional, cognitive and patient-centered outcome measures.

The aim of the study is: To validate the Romanian translation of OHIP-EDENT (Oral Health Impact Profile in Edentulous Adults), the short form of OHIP (Oral Health Impact Profile) developed by Allen and Locker for edentulous adults. The OHIP questionnaire is an efficient instrument for assessment of OHRQoL - Oral Health-Related Quality of Life. To compare satisfaction of 69 fully mandibular edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures with three different types of retention: Retentive Anchors, Magnets, Locator.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ implants, in patients with totally edentulous upper jaws and poor bone quality and quantity, when provisional artificial teeth are attached within 24 hours. The primary objective is to investigate implant survival rate.

The goal of this cross-over clinical trial is to investigate the precision of digital implant impressions using an intraoral scanner and photogrammetry in obtaining complete-arch implant-supported scans. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: Is there a difference in precision between intraoral scans and photogrammetry in obtaining digital implant scans? Will arch perimeter and jaw type (maxilla vs. mandible) affect the precision results? Procedures: At each appointment, participants existing permanent/temporary prosthesis or healing caps were unscrewed and temporarily removed for the period of the consultation appointment. Scanbodies were screwed into their implants for the duration of the appointment. They underwent two types of digital implant impression procedures (five times each), including intraoral scan and photogrammetry. Intraoral and extraoral photography were taken. At the end of each appointment, the scanbodies were removed, and existing bridge/healing caps were reinserted. The procedures were not painful or required any form of local anesthetic Comparison group: Researchers compared the precision of intraoral scanning vs. photogrammetry to see which device provided the best precision outcomes.

The objective of this study is to compare the canine guidance (CG) and bilateral balanced occlusion (BBO) on denture satisfaction and kinesiographic parameters of complete denture wearers, by means of a cross-over trial. Edentulous patients will receive new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures and, after the intraoral adjustments and adaptation period, will randomly receive a sequence of occlusal schemes: BBO followed by CG, or CG followed by BBO.

The study will involve placing a dental implant through a guided surgery protocol developed using 3D CT technology. Because the implant position is planned digitally using the CT data from the patient, this allows investigation of an abutment that supports the implant crown and soft tissues to be fabricated prior to implant placement. In doing so, this makes the protocol for patient care simpler and faster. In fabricating the the abutment prior to surgery, the investigators will design the abutments at different heights below the gumline to see an optimal margin height for fabrication of the abutment prior to surgery. The study hypothesis is that more often the abutment margin placed just slightly below (.5mm) the gumline will be visible about half of the time while the abutment margin placed further under the gumline (1.5mm) will be visible only about 10% of the time. The optimal outcome is that at delivery and follow-up, the abutment margin will not show intraorally.

Fifteen (15) patients completely edentulous in the maxilla will be treated with 8 dental implants. The total treatment will be done in 2 stages to allow, within the same group, a study of two different approaches. Miniscrews that can be functionally loaded will be provided by 3i with the design and surface textures as wanted by the study sponsor.