Active clinical trials for "Multiple Chronic Conditions"

People of low socio economic status (SES) more often than others suffer from chronic diseases like diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or coronary diseases. Compared to others People of low SES more often have to deal with multiple diseases (multimorbidity) and experience worse health outcomes. The health literacy of people of low SES is often low. Current chronic disease management programs focus on reducing the burden of a single disease by prescribing medication, protocoled monitoring routines, or lifestyle advice. However, the effectiveness of these interventions is low in people with low SES, as the interventions insufficiently take into account the specific problems and needs of this (multimorbid) population. A person-centered and integrated-care approach, that puts the patient at the center of care instead of the disease and in which care is tailored to the individual patient with chronic disease(s), seems to be more appropriate, but only when low SES people are closely involved in the development, testing, and evaluation of such an approach. Also, certain preconditions should be met, such as training of specific knowledge and skills of the healthcare professionals involved. In the EMBOSS project, the investigators will develop, test, evaluate, and implement a person-centered integrated-care approach for and in close collaboration with people with low SES who have one or more chronic diseases. Thus, the EMBOSS study will have the potential to reducing health disparities in this group, to broadening the action perspectives of general practitioners and practice nurses for an increasing diverse patient population and to a better fit of lifestyle interventions in people of low SES.

Chronic diseases and multimorbidity are increasingly prevalent. However, over the last decades, attempts at improving primary care for chronic diseases have been focussed on the management of individual chronic diseases and single disease management (SDM) programs have been implemented in Dutch primary care. This causes multiple problems for patients with one or more chronic diseases, such as negative interaction between treatment of single diseases, high treatment burden, negative patient experiences, lack of attention for problems in other domains of life that may interact with the chronic disease, and difficulties in shared decision making by the use of strict protocols in SDM programs. A person-centred and holistic approach is widely recognized as the solution to the problems observed in chronic disease care. Therefore, we guided three large Dutch primary care cooperatives, who have been organizing SDM programmes on diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2), COPD, and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in primary care for the last decades, with the development of a new generic disease management (GDM) programme including a person-centered and holistic approach (CMO 2019-5756). The three primary care cooperatives have recently conducted a pilot study in which we evaluated the feasibility of the programme (CMO 2021-8106) to further optimise its content and procedures. In the coming years, all three primary care cooperatives will gradually implement the optimised programme in all general practices in their regions. In the current study, our aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of the GDM programme on Quadruple Aim outcomes, i.e. patient experiences, population health, health care provider experiences, and cost effectiveness. We will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial in the three primary care cooperatives with a follow-up of 12 months. Fifteen practices will be randomised to either care as usual according to the current SDM programmes, or to the GDM programme including a person-centered and holistic care approach. Approximately 40 patients per practice with DM2, COPD and/or CVD will be recruited.

Approximately 45% of older adults in the U.S. have 2 or more chronic health conditions (e.g., arthritis, hypertension, diabetes) in addition to functional limitations that prevent performance of health self-management activities. Self-management continues to be the gold standard for managing MCC, but functional limitations create difficulty with these activities (e.g., physical activity, symptom monitoring). Restricted self-management accelerates the downward spiral of disability and accumulating chronic conditions which, in turn, increases rates of institutionalization and death by 5-fold. Currently, there are no tested interventions designed to improve independence in health self-management activities in older adults with MCC and functional limitations. Research suggests that older adults are more likely to change behavior with interventions that assist with planning health-promoting daily activities, especially when contending with complex medical regimens and functional limitations. Combined with occupational therapy (OT), behavioral activation (BA) shows promise to improve health self-management in populations with chronic conditions and/or functional limitations. This innovative combination uses the goal setting, scheduling/monitoring activities, and problem-solving components of the BA approach as well as the environmental modification, activity adaptation, and focus on daily routines from OT practice. The investigators will test the effect of this combined approach in a Stage I, randomized controlled pilot feasibility study compared to enhanced usual care. The investigators will recruit 40 older adults with MCC and functional limitation and randomize 20 to the PI- delivered BA-OT protocol. This research will inform modification and larger-scale testing of this novel intervention and provide data for a federally funded career development award.

Children living with a chronic physical condition (CPC) are more likely than their peers without a disease to develop psychological difficulties or disorders (Hysing et al., 2007). To prevent or treat these difficulties and disorders, many psychotherapeutic approaches have been developed and tested. Most of them follow a categorical approach, based on a global diagnosis (e.g., Moreira et al., 2013). Few interventions are conducted from a processual perspective (Nef et al., 2012) studying underlying mechanisms of psychological functioning. Emotions and cognitions represent such underlying processes and play an important role in many psychopathological disorders. These processes can weaken but also protect a child from developing psychological difficulties, depending on whether they are effective or not (Gipson et al., 2006; Hysing et al., 2007; Lahaye et al., 2011). The present research project aims to identify a psychological intervention that builds on knowledge of emotional and cognitive processes, considered as protective and risk factors, to prevent/treat psychological difficulties. The project will be conducted in two parts: The first phase aims to better understand the action mechanisms of psychological interventions, focused on emotional and cognitive difficulties of children with CPCs. First, a systematic review will identify recent literature which reports the efficacy of psychological interventions which focused on emotional and cognitive processes. Second, interviews with experts (e.g., pediatricians, psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses, educators) in the field of CPCs and with parents/families of children with CPCs will be conducted. Individual and focus group meetings will be organized, with the aim of identifying the needs of children, based on clinical and practical knowledge and experience. A third phase will consist of the selection of an intervention that will be based on the results of the first two phases. In the second part (not yet registered), the selected intervention will be set up for a feasibility study (Bowen et al., 2009). For this, a small sample of children will participate in the intervention. Participants will be randomly allocated to an intervention group and a control group. The control group will participate in an alternative intervention (e.g., information on chronic diseases). The exact content of the intervention and its form (number of sessions, duration etc.) will be determined by the focus group. The intervention's efficacy will be evaluated (evaluation of emotional and cognitive processes as well as psychological and physiological health), using a mixed method approach. The results will be analyzed and discussed with the focus group. Limitations and perspectives will be formulated to allow for possible transfer of the intervention for future use or to other areas of psychology (Durlak & DuPre, 2008).

This is a 12-month multi-level behavioral cluster randomized trial testing a church-based intervention to improve physical function (PF) in African Americans with PF limitations.

Patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) have a range of needs that extend beyond traditional medical care, including behavioral, mental health, and social needs. While primary care does its best to address these needs, few practices can undertake a systematic approach without broader health system and coordinated community support. Fortunately, communities and health systems are investing in new models of care to address these needs. New tools are emerging that allow for enhanced care planning to identify and prioritize patients' needs based on their values, preferences, social, and clinical context. Additionally, support systems to promote partnerships between patients and clinical and community care teams are emerging. Building on work occurring as part of the Richmond Accountable Health Community, the investigators propose to (a) evaluate the implementation of an enhanced care planning approach, paired with community-clinical linkages support to address health behavior, mental health, and social needs; (b) determine within a randomized controlled trial the benefit of this approach compared to usual care; and (c) assess which person, family, community, and system contextual factors that influence MCC.

This study aims to predict and minimize post-discharge adverse events (AEs) during care transitions through early identification and escalation of patient-reported symptoms to inpatient and ambulatory clinicians by way of predictive algorithms and clinically integrated digital health apps. We will (1) develop and prospectively validate a predictive model of post-discharge AEs for patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCC); (2) combine, adapt, extend, and iteratively refine our EHR-integrated digital health infrastructure in a series of design sessions with patient and clinician participants; (3) conduct a RCT to evaluate the impact of ePRO monitoring on post-discharge AEs for MCC patients discharged from the general medicine service across Brigham Health; and (4) use mixed methods to evaluate barriers and facilitators of implementation and use as we develop a plan for sustainability, scale, and dissemination.

This trial aims to evaluate the ADAPT Program in terms of efficacy, process and cost-efficacy compared to usual occupational therapy (UOT) in people with decreased ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) following chronic conditions. As both the ADAPT Program and UOT are targeted improvements in ADL ability, the primary objective of this trial is to assess equivalence between the ADAPT Program and UOT on changes in ADL ability as measured with the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS).

The Shared Decision Making about Medication Use for People with Multiple Health Problems study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of a deprescribing educational intervention in primary care for patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia and/or multiple chronic conditions (MCC), the patients' care partners, clinicians, and medical assistants. The intervention consists of the following strategies: 1) a patient/caregiver component focused on education and activation about deprescribing, and 2) a clinician component focused on increasing clinician awareness about options and processes for deprescribing in the MCI/dementia and/or MCC population. Clinicians will each be asked to participate in a single, 15-minute educational session on deprescribing, and medical residents will receive a 45-minute lecture. Patients, caregivers, clinicians, and medical assistants will participate in a single one-on-one debriefing interview.

The investigators will conduct a randomized control trial enrolling 366 older Veterans with multiple chronic conditions receiving primary care at the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and VA Connecticut Medical Center to determine if Patient Priorities Care reduces treatment burden, increases priorities-aligned home and community services, and sets shared health outcome goals compared with usual care. The investigators will randomize at the patient level rather than clinic or clinician level to evaluate the effect of identifying patient priorities on clinician decision making and alignment of care with identified priorities.