Active clinical trials for "Multiple Sclerosis"

The main purpose of this study is to assess the usability and value of the multiple sclerosis (MS) care management platform in terms of improved monitoring of people with MS (pwMS) in clinical practice. This is a two-year prospective data collection study with additional data collection at baseline evaluating medical practice over a period of at least one year before the introduction of the MS care management platform.

Different therapies can improve clinical and motor symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS) similarly, but studies comparing the effects of different exercise therapies on clinical and motor outcomes are scant. We compared the effects of exergaming (EXE), balance (BAL), cycling (CYC), proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF), and a standard care wait-listed control group (CON) on clinical and motor symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in people with MS (PwMS). Methods: PwMS (n = 68, 90% female; age, 47.0 yr; Expanded Disability Status Scale score 5-6) were randomized into five groups. Before and after the interventions (five times a week for 5 wk), PwMS were tested for MS-related clinical and motor symptoms (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29), primary outcome), QoL (EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire), symptoms of depression, gait and balance ability (Tinetti Assessment Tool), static and dynamic balance and fall risk (Berg Balance Scale), walking capacity (6-min walk test), and standing posturography on a force platform. Patients were followed up for 2 years after 5 weeks of intensive care. Tests are performed every six months.

MS patients were randomly divided into traditional therapy and traditional therapy + cervical mobilization groups. While muscle strengthening, stretching, balance and coordination exercises were given to the traditional group, cervical mobilization was applied in addition to these in cervical group. Patients received treatments twice a week for 4 weeks. The effect of the applied treatment on the tonus and plantar pressure distribution was analyzed. Treatments were interrupted for 4 weeks and the groups continued with the treatment they did not receive (crossover design). The group that received traditional treatment in the first period completed traditional + cervical mobilization, and the other group with traditional + cervical mobilization traditionally completed the treatment.

The purpose of this study is to understand whether participants can mount an immune response to SARS-CoV-2 modRNA vaccines administered either during continuous siponimod treatment or during a treatment break.

Ocrelizumab (OCR) is a humanized anti-CD20 antibody approved for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS), due to neuroprotective effects of partially unknown origin. While its mechanism of action is mainly thought to occur via B cell depletion, previous studies on rituximab, another anti-CD20 drug, showed that CD20 binding elicits several intracellular signalling pathways, also including Protein Kinase C (PKC) activation. Of interest, the β isoform of PKC is known to modulate, through the RNA-binding protein ELAV/HuR, the expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), a signaling protein that has been suggested to play deleterious effects in the first phases of MS. Therefore, the hypothesis is that part of the neuroprotective effects exerted by OCR may also be due to the modulation of VEGF expression via PKCβ /HuR cascade. The primary objective is to evaluate the variation of the expression of VEGF (protein and mRNA) in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) induced by OCR therapy. No additional visits will be required outside of clinical practice. Additional laboratory testing (VEGF protein expression and PKCbeta/HuR cascade) will be performed on extra blood which will be taken during the routine blood exams. This study is an observational, longitudinal, monocenter and single arm study, in patients with RMS who are newly prescribed with OCR as per clinical practice. The study consists of the following visits as per clinical practice T0 visit: at the first dose of OCR, blood sample and clinical/radiological MS data will be collected. T6: after 6 months of OCR treatment, blood samples and clinical MS data will be collected. T12 visit: after 12 months of OCR treatment, blood samples and clinical MS data will be collected.

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 4 study in which eligible patients with RADIOLOGICALLY ISOLATED SYNDROME (RIS) (as defined by meeting 2017 McDonald criteria for DIS) will be randomized 1:1 to receive ocrelizumab treatment or placebo (standard of care).

A limited number of studies on microRNA expression variation in immune cells have been reported in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). These studies have been performed mostly on a small scale and on whole blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). In a number of cases, RRMS progresses to a severe secondary neurodegenerative form. In this context, it is important to look for biomarkers that could indicate the pathogenic activity of certain immune cell subpopulations.

This is a randomized, double-blind study of PIPE-307 or placebo in normal healthy subjects. The study will be conducted in three parts: Part 1 will be a Single Ascending Dose (SAD) study enrolling approximately 48 subjects for a total duration of 6 weeks. Part 2 will be a Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) study enrolling approximately 24 subjects for a total duration of 7 weeks, and part 3 will be a selected SAD cohort in a fed state to evaluate the effect of food on the bioavailability of PIPE-307, enrolling approximately 8 subjects from a selected SAD cohort for a duration of 6 weeks.

This study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of multiple doses of nabiximols as adjunctive therapy compared with placebo on a clinical measure of velocity-dependent muscle tone in the lower limbs (Modified Ashworth Scale Lower Limb Muscle Tone-6 [MAS LLMT-6]) in participants with multiple sclerosis (MS) who have not achieved adequate relief from spasticity with other antispasticity medications.

The primary objective of this study was to assess the bioequivalence of the test product (Bafiertam; BLS-11; monomethyl fumarate) 190 mg versus Tecfidera® (dimethyl fumarate) 240 mg based on the Cmax and Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of monomethyl fumarate (MMF) determined after a single dose under fasting conditions.