Active clinical trials for "Myocardial Ischemia"

The purpose of this study is to determine which treatment option is better for patients who have isolated coronary artery disease (blockages of one vessel supplying blood to the heart muscle). The treatment options compared in this study are: Endoscopic coronary arterial bypass Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. This study is aimed to determine the best treatment for patients with coronary artery disease.

To observe the effects of fastigial nucleus stimulation on serum inflammation, oxidative stress related factors, cardiac autonomic function and prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease

The study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, exploratory trail to evaluate the strategy of "one-stop" endovascular treatment for concomitant coronary artery disease and aortic atherosclerotic disease.

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of autologous bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells compared to placebo (sham operation) when administered via percutaneous coronary infusion to patients with ischemic heart disease, who are screened by D-SPECT and have pretreated with 3-month cardiac shock wave therapy.

Based on accumulating evidence showing that impaired cardiac energetic metabolism plays important role in the mechanism of cardiac diastolic dysfunction,the study is designed to evaluate whether metabolic modulator treatment with trimetazidine could have beneficial effects on patients with coronary heart disease(CHD) and ventricular diastolic dysfunction.This study is a prospective,randomised,open-label trial to assess the efficacy of trimetazidine treatment in improving diastolic function in CHD patients with diastolic dysfunction.

The IVL Left Main study is a prospective non-randomised pilot study to investigate the mechanical and procedural outcomes and safety of distal left main stenting with coronary lithotripsy in addition to standard techniques in patients with calcific left main disease and a clinical indication for revascularisation.

The objective of this research proposal is to find out whether comparing the two different anaesthetic maintenance techniques (Propofol vs volatile anaesthetics) in adult patients undergoing heart surgery is practical for the anaesthetist treating the patients and whether it is feasible for the research team to recruit patients and follow them up after the operation.

The investigators propose a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an anti-inflammatory agent methotrexate in a cholesterol-rich non-protein nanoparticle (MTX-LDE) in patients with stable coronary disease. Patients with multi-vessels stable coronary disease will be randomized to receive MTX-LDE IV or placebo-LDE IV each 7 days for 12 weeks. The primary and main secondary endpoints will be analyzed by coronary and aortic CT angiography, that will be performed before the first treatment cycle, four weeks after the last drug infusion and 12 months after randomization. Patients will undergo clinical and laboratory safety evaluations before each treatment cycle, four weeks after the last cycle and 12 months after randomization. An algorithm for drug suspension based on clinical and laboratory finding will be followed.

This study aims to test the hypothesis that jailed-balloon technique(JBT) is superior to jailed-wire technique(JWT) in non-left main coronary bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) by lowering the risk of side branch(SB) loss and PCI related myocardial infarction, as well as 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events(MACEs).

Title: A randomized, double-blind, multi-centered, placebo-controlled trial to examine effects of of Heart-protecting Musk Pill on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease Objective: To examine effects of of Heart-protecting Musk Pill, a traditional Chinese medicine, on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease The study hypothesis: The null hypothesis: the combined incidence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke in the treatment group is the same as that in control group. The alternative hypothesis: the combined incidence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke in the treatment group is different from that in control group. Sample size: 2700 patients will be randomized, 1350 in treatment group and 1350 in placebo group. Number of sites: 99 sites in China Study drugs: Heart-protecting Musk Pill and the matching placebo pills. Design: A randomized, double-blind, multi-centered, placebo-controlled trial. Patients will be randomized to treatment group and placebo group after screening and get corresponding treatment as follow. Treatment group: Standard treatment for coronary artery disease plus 2 Heart-protecting Musk Pills each time, three times a day by mouth for 24 months. Control group: Standard treatment for coronary artery disease plus 2 placebo pills each time, three times a day by mouth for 24 months. Patients will be followed up at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months after randomization. During follow-up period, patients could undertake PCI or CABG if angina get out of control or evidence of ischemia aggravated is found.