Active clinical trials for "Myofascial Pain Syndromes"

The present study is a new approach of examining tailored cognitive-behavioral interventions for fibromyalgia patients at risk. For this purpose, fibromyalgia patients are screened with respect to cognitive-behavioral risk factors and these patients are offered tailored cognitive-behavioral treatment options. It is expected that this approach will result in increased magnitude and maintenance of effects.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of injections of Botox (botulinum toxin type A) for the treatment of chronic neck pain. Botox is an approved treatment for patients with cervical dystonia. Cervical dystonia is a chronic condition characterized by involuntary movements of the neck that are often painful. In this study, the response from Botox in patients with neck pain not associated with cervical dystonia will be compared to the pain response in patients with cervical dystonia.

The main purpose of this protocol is to evaluate the long-term safety of pregabalin in patients who participated in the previous fibromyalgia Study A0081056 and who wish to receive open-label pregabalin therapy.

This study is designed to evaluate duloxetine for the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome patients.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new form of brainwave biofeedback is effective in the treatment of fibromyalgia.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Xyrem (sodium oxybate) is effective when used alone to treat the pain and sleep disturbances of fibromyalgia.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of individualized classical homeopathy in treatment of persons with fibromyalgia and to determine the usefulness of electroencephalographic and electrocardiographic measures to serve as markers of differences between active and placebo treatment.

The goal of this proposal is to evaluate the efficacy of a multiple component mind-body (MCMB) therapy for fibromyalgia, both in short and long term outcomes. Preliminary work suggests that FM patients do benefit from MCMB therapy (Singh et al 1998; Creamer et al 1998). This two-arm clinical trial will randomize 110 patients to either a 12 week MCMB intervention or a 12 week education/attention intervention. The primary aims of this study are 1) to determine if a 12 week MCMB intervention improves short term (i.e. at 12 weeks) outcomes in FM patients compared to an education/attention control group; and 2) to determine if a 12 week MCMB intervention improves long term (i.e. at 24 weeks) outcomes in FM patients compared to an education/attention control group. A secondary aim of this project involves determining if there are patient characteristics (i.e. disease severity and duration, demographics, psychological factors) associated with improvements in short or long term outcomes as well as responses to the MCMB intervention. The primary outcome measure will include physical functioning and pain as measured by the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire.

This study will evaluate the effects of matching treatments to people with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) on the basis of their psychosocial and behavioral characteristics. We will look at how patients respond to a rehabilitation program that includes physical therapy and information about fibromyalgia. We will combine this program with psychological treatments that are either matched or mismatched to the way patients cope with and adapt to symptoms of FMS. The second aim of our study is to better understand how different FMS symptoms may vary together and how these symptoms change as a result of treatment in a person's natural environment. People with FMS and healthy people of the same ages will record their moods, thoughts, symptoms, activities, and fatigue levels three times a day for 2 weeks. Participants will use palm-top computers to record these "real-time" assessments. This approach will permit people to rate how they feel at a particular time rather than looking back in time.

Introduction. The myofascial trigger point (MTrP) is a clinical entity related to different clinical pictures of pain. Dry needling (DN) would be the most appropriate therapeutic option for its treatment, although it has mild-moderate adverse effects, such as post-needling soreness (PNS). The exercise could be a strategy for its management, but no recommendations on the most effective mode have been found. Objectives To determine the effectiveness of the exercise, differentiated according to the dominant mode (concentric, eccentric, isometric), in order to reduce the PNS of latent MTrPs. To analyse the variables that, a priori, can influence the evolution of pain. Methods. Study design .A randomized clinical trial. Scenario Private or home-based consultation in Global Physiotherapy, Madrid, Spain. Participants. Voluntaries, with no symptoms in the triceps surae muscle,>18 years old, who present at least one latent MTrP in medial gastrocnemius. Subjects with: other pathologies of lower limbs, active MTrP in the medial gastrocnemius muscle, contraindications to DN, prior application of DN and/or other therapies in MTrPs during the three months previous to the study (in gastrocnemius muscles) will be excluded. Intervention After DN of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, participants will be randomly allocated to four groups (three experimental groups and one control). In the experimental groups, subjects will be instructed to perform exercise protocols, differentiated according to the dominant contraction (concentric, eccentric, isometric) in muscle the gastrocnemius previously treated. Outcome measures. Pain intensity, by analog visual scale (VAS). Pressure pain threshold (PPT), by analog algometer. Demographics and anthropometrics. Protocol. Before and immediately after DN, the PPT will be evaluated in the latent MTrP. Pain intensity will also be assessed using VAS at two times: the first referred to pain during DN and the other referred to PNS two minutes after DN. The subjects will then be randomly divided into: a control group without any intervention after DN, and three experimental groups with different exercise protocols (differentiated by the dominant contraction: 3 sets x 15 reps, 3s each contraction, 30s of rest between sets) . The pain intensity will be recorded again by VAS, after the exercise session and at 6h, 12h, 24h, 48h, 72h after DN. PPT will also be assessed 2min after DN, after the exercise session and at 24h, and 48h after DN.