Active clinical trials for "Neoplasm Metastasis"

Primary Objectives: Dose Escalation: To determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD) and overall safety and tolerability profile of SAR441000 when administered intratumorally as monotherapy and in combination with cemiplimab in patients who have no alternative standard treatment options. Dose Expansion (Combination): To determine the objective response rate of SAR441000 administered intratumorally in combination with cemiplimab in patients with melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma or head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Secondary Objectives: To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of SAR441000 administered as monotherapy and in combination with cemiplimab. To assess the immunogenicity of SAR441000. To characterize the safety of SAR441000 when administered intratumorally in combination with cemiplimab. To determine the disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR) and progression free survival (PFS) of SAR441000. To determine the recommended dose of SAR441000 for the expansion phase.

This study will attempt to determine the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy followed by nivolumab monotherapy in patients with metastatic prostate cancer and other tumor solid tumor histologies harboring loss of CDK12 function as well as monotherapy nivolumab treatment in patient with metastatic prostate cancer harboring loss of CDK12 function.

Safety, Efficacy, PK and PD of CTAP101 (calcifediol) ER Capsules for SHPT in HD Patients VDI

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in participants with BRAFV600 wild-type melanoma with central nervous system (CNS) metastases and of cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and vemurafenib in BRAFV600 mutation-positive melanoma patients with CNS metastases.

The proposed study is an open-label, single-arm, Phase-Ib/II trial to assess the efficacy of oral drug combination ruxolitinib and pomalidomide in primary and secondary MF patients.

The purpose of this research project is to test the effectiveness of nivolumab versus nivolumab together with ipilimumab for the treatment of melanoma brain metastases. Patients are eligible to join this study if they are aged 18 years or above and have been diagnosed with melanoma with brain metastases.

This randomized phase III trial studies how well combination chemotherapy with or without ganitumab works in treating patients with newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma that has spread to other parts of the body. Treatment with drugs that block the IGF-1R pathway, such as ganitumab, may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether adding ganitumab to combination chemotherapy is more effective in treating patients with newly diagnosed metastatic Ewing sarcoma.

This study will compare pain (primary end-point) and local metastatic tumor control (secondary end-point) after dose-intensified image-guided fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for painful mass-type spinal metastases versus conventional radiation therapy.

Whole Brain Radiation Therapy (WBRT) has long been the mainstay of treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases (BM). Meanwhile, Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been increasingly employed in the management of multiple BM to spare healthy tissue. Hence, GKRS is expected to cause fewer cognitive side effects than WBRT. Treatment of multiple BM without cognitive side effects is becoming more important, as more patients live longer due to better systemic treatment options. There are no published randomized trials yet directly comparing GKRS to WBRT in patients with multiple BM, including objective neuropsychological testing. CAR-Study B is a prospective randomized trial comparing cognitive outcome after GKRS or WBRT in eligible patients with 11-20 BM.

Part A: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Niraparib and TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part B: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-Paclitaxel and TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part C: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Niraparib, TSR-042 and Bevacizumab and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part D: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-Paclitaxel, TSR-042 and Bevacizumab and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part E: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-Pemetrexed and TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part F: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-Pemetrexed, TSR-022 and TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part G: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-nab-Paclitaxel, TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part H: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-nab-Paclitaxel, TSR-022 and TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study. Part I: To test the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with Carboplatin-Paclitaxel, TSR-022 and TSR-042 and to establish a safe dose that will be used in a Phase 2 study.