Active clinical trials for "Breast Neoplasms"

Window of Opportunity Trial of Olaparib and Durvalumab (MEDI4736) before Standard Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II/III Triple Negative or Low ER+ Breast Cancer

Some studies have demonstrated the efficacy of Abraxane in treating breast cancer in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. Few data is available on Abraxane in neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer. The aim of this project is to evaluate tailored primary systemic therapy with weekly Abraxane (125mg/m2) Combined With Q3week Epirubicin (100mg/m2) in early operable (stage of T2-4N0-3M0) breast cancer. This study will be an open label non randomized, single arm, single center study.

This is a prospective single arm open-label Phase 2 study utilising the combination of Fulvestrant, Metformin and Simvastatin in post-menopausal ER-positive metastatic breast cancer, with the primary endpoint being Clinical Benefit Rate (defined as complete response, partial response or stable disease, equal to or more than 24 weeks). The hypothesis is that the addition of Metformin and Simvastatin to Fulvestrant will improve the Clinical Benefit Rate from 40% (historical data from control arm of PALOMA-3 study) to 60%. A total of 28 patients will be enrolled over a period of 24 months. Eligible patients will receive 500 mg Fulvestrant by intramuscular injection on days 1 and 15 of cycle one and then on day one of each subsequent cycle (28 days). Patients will be given 850mg oral Metformin twice-a-day (based on xenograft models which showed that Metformin had anti-tumor effects at a minimum dose of 1500mg per day), and 20mg oral Simvastatin every night (drawing reference from the investigators' group's window-of-opportunity study), daily throughout the cycle. As part of the in-build safety and tolerability design, all patients will have a lead-in period of 7 days where they receive 850mg oral Metformin twice-a-day and 20mg oral Simvastatin every night. Special adverse events of interest include lactic acidosis, diarrhea, bloatedness, transaminitis and rhabdomyolysis. If no dose-limiting toxic effects (DLT) occur, Fulvestrant will be commenced, and considered the start of cycle 1. If DLT occurs in any of the patients, the combination of Metformin and Simvastatin will be modified for the affected patient as per protocol, with further monitoring for another 7 days. This combination will be deemed safe for that patient if no DLT occurs, following which cycle 1 can officially commence. At the time of study entry, blood samples will be drawn to establish baseline physiological parameters including fasting insulin, glucose, lipids and Homeostasis Model Assessment 2 (HOMA2). In patients who have accessible tumor sites and are willing to provide tissue for translational research, pre- and post-treatment (at end of 8 weeks) biopsies will be taken for correlative biomarker studies. Patients will be evaluated on an 8-weekly basis for toxicities and efficacy assessments during the first 6 months of treatment, followed by 12-weekly thereafter until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or patient withdrawal.

Breast cancer related lymphedema (BRCL) is a common complication following breast cancer treatment. The incidence of BRCL ranges from 6-50%, depending on the surgical procedure in the axilla and the type of the radiation therapy. BRCL can causes cosmetic deformities, impaired physical mobility, mental discomfort, reduced quality of life and erysipelas. Therapy of BRCL is divided into conservative and operative methods. However, all the above method has some shortcomings. It is urgent to investigate new approaches to treat BRCL. In this study, fat grafting is to be used for the treatment of BRCL, and the efficacy and safety of this method will be also assessed.

This pilot trial evaluates in vivo megestrol acetate (MA) modulation of steroidal receptors in advanced breast cancer.

Due to the Danish breast cancer-screening programme and the increased use of genetic counselling, Danish women are being diagnosed with breast cancer, or a high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer, at a younger age than previously. An increasing proportion of these women pursue an immediate breast reconstruction, where the breast is removed and reconstructed in a single surgical procedure. As some of these women will need to undergo adjuvant cancer therapy after their breast surgery, fast recovery is essential in order for the adjuvant therapy not to be delayed. With the development of new surgical techniques, the complication rate to the immediate breast reconstructions has improved. However, wound-healing issues remain one of the most common complications to the surgery with the possibility of delaying the adjuvant therapy and diminish the aesthetic result. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT), is a new approach for surgical site closure. Recently, iNPWT has shown promising results in lowering post-operative complications, including wound-healing issues, in other surgical settings. However, iNPWT has still not been studied in an immediate breast reconstructive setting. The current randomized controlled clinical study will investigate if an iNPWT system, is able to provide women seeking an immediate breast reconstruction with faster healing and superior aesthetic results compared to the conventional post-operative wound dressings used today. The investigators plan to include 60 women, randomized in a 1:1 ratio between iNPWT or conventional wound dressing. The primary outcome measure is the time until removal of the surgical drains, which corresponds to the healing progression. Secondarily, complications to the surgery, assessment of the scar (measured using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale) and patient reported satisfaction with the reconstruction (assessed using the BREAST-Q questionnaire) will be performed. Included patients are examined pre-operatively, and at the routine controls at four weeks and four months post operatively. The results from the current study will elucidate if iNPWT aids wound healing after immediate breast reconstruction, which would lead to fewer patients experiencing delays before their adjuvant therapy. Furthermore, the results from the aesthetic satisfaction will elucidate if iNPWT provides the patients with a better self-reported aesthetic result.

This is a randomized controlled trial of HER-2 positive breast cancer patients treated with lapatinib and paclitaxel vs herceptin and paclitaxel with sequential and synchronous anthracycline

This is a phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SHR6390 in combination with Fulvestrant versus placebo combined with Fulvesrant in Patients who have HR positive and HER2 negative recurrent/metastatic breast cancer and have received prior endocrine therapy are eligible for study.

To compare the therapeutic effect of vinorelbine used alone or combined with apatinib mesylate for recurrent or metastatic TNBC patients who have at least received one chemotherapy regimen, including anthracyclines and taxanes, providing clinical evidence for multi-line treatment options for advanced TNBC.

This is a single-center phase II study designed to evaluated the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant in combination with oral vinorelbine in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer