Active clinical trials for "Lung Neoplasms"

To assess the efficacy and feasibility of high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin for patients with locoregionally advanced non-small lung cancer.

To evaluate the progression free survival of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer treated with anlotinib combined with EP/CE regimen

The purpose of this study is to observe the clinical effect and safety of Recombinant Human Endostatin in non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis

The study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the anti-MUC1 CAR T cells and /or PD-1 knockout engineered T cells for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Small cell lung cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy. Currently, there is no effective regimen for patients after the progression offirst-line chemotherapy. The prognosis of patients with extensive disease is very poor, and the improved therapeutic efficacy is urgently needed. Most patients with small cell lung cancer have a long history of smoking, and the tumor mutation burden is relatively high, which provides potential for immunological checkpoint inhibitors represented by PD-1 antibodies. A number of studies have shown that chemotherapy combined with adoptive cellular immunotherapy could prolong the survival of patients. This study is a clinical study to explore the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with sintilimab after 4-6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy combined with adoptive cellular immunotherapy in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer.

This is an open-label, single center, non-randomized, phase Ib trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of TQB2450 injection combined with anlotinib in patients with advanced mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Surgery is the first choice of treatment for early-stage primary pulmonary malignancies, but up to 15% of all patients, and 33% of patients greater than 75 years of age, are not surgical candidate's due to locally advanced disease, poor cardiopulmonary reserve and significant medical co-morbidities. Some patients are also unwilling to undergo surgery. This has prompted the development of alternatives to surgery so that local control of unresectable tumors can be achieved. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is currently an alternative therapy for these patients with 3-year survival rates of between 42 and 60%. SBRT has excellent local control rates and a favorable toxicity profile relative to other surgical and non-surgical therapies. Radiation pneumonitis (RP), amongst others, is one of the major toxicities which can limit the maximal radiation dose that can be safely delivered to thoracic tumors. Reported rates of SBRT induced RP requiring clinical intervention range from 0% to 29% and life-threatening toxicities have been reported in up to 12% of cases in various studies. The potential for toxicities from SBRT could limit the number of times a patient could be treated with SBRT for residual, recurrent or new pulmonary lesions over time. Following the first report of thermal ablation for lung malignancies in 2000, this modality has been used to treat primary and secondary malignancies and has emerged as an effective, low-cost, safe and repeatable alternative to SBRT for local tumour control. The most widely practised technique is radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Microwave ablation (MWA) is a relatively new therapy and offers all the advantages of RFA, but with significant additional advantages 3. These include reduced procedure times, lower complication rates, increased ablative temperatures, improved propagation of thermal energy particularly in the lung, improved efficacy in lesions that are in close proximity to blood vessels due to reduced heat-sink effect, and less procedure associated pain 2,3. Using high energy MWA to treat 87 pulmonary tumors, Egashira et al achieved a primary technical success rate of 94% and technique effectiveness of 98% at a median of 15 months. MWA is performed by Interventional Radiologists using CT guidance. The treatment is performed under general anaesthesia and is repeatable. Multiple lesions can be ablated in one treatment session. Patients can potentially be discharged the same day of treatment, if there are no adverse events. MWA is a relatively new treatment option that could be considered in situations where the patient is not a candidate for further treatment with surgery, SBRT or chemotherapy, or the patient declines the recommended standard available treatments. Objectives for Phase I: The primary objective for Phase I of this study will be to demonstrate the Safety of MWA performed for treatment of lung malignancy in patients not suitable for surgery, chemotherapy or SBRT. Primary objective (Safety): to determine the proportion of patients experiencing local adverse events at one week definitively related to the mwa procedure. Secondary objective (Feasibility): To determine the proportion of patients in whom technical success of MWA was achieved by assessing completion of ablation on CT at the time of the procedure, indicated by replacement of tumor by ground glass change (including a 5mm ablation zone in normal surrounding lung parenchyma). Objectives for Phase II Primary objective (Efficacy): To demonstrate efficacy by measuring the proportion of patients demonstrating absence of residual tumor on follow up CT at 1 month after MWA. Secondary objective: To determine the proportion of patients needing re-treatment for recurrent tumor at 1 month post MWA.

Phase I/II Study in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) of Veliparib in Combination With Topotecan

To evaluates the effectiveness and safety of Toripalimab combined with Anlotinib and chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC, and maintenance therapy are Toripalimab combined with Anlotinib.

This project is to to explore the safety and efficacy of shr-1210 combined with albumin, paclitaxel and carboplatin in the first-line treatment of extensive small cell lung cancer