Active clinical trials for "Neoplasms, Plasma Cell"

Patients have a type of cancer called NHL, Multiple Myeloma (MM) or CLL that has come back or has not gone away after treatment. There is no standard treatment for the cancer at this time or the currently used treatments do not work completely in all cases like these. This is a gene transfer research study using special immune cells. The body has different ways of fighting infection and disease. No single way seems perfect for fighting cancers. This research study combines two different ways of fighting disease, antibodies and T cells, that investigators hope will work together. Antibodies are types of proteins that protect the body from bacterial and other diseases. T cells, also called T lymphocytes, are special infection-fighting blood cells that can kill other cells, including tumor cells. Both antibodies and T cells have been used to treat patients with cancers; they have shown promise, but have not been strong enough to cure most patients. The antibody used in this study recognizes a protein on the lymphoma, MM or CLL cells called kappa immunoglobulin. Antibodies can stick to lymphoma, MM or CLL cells when it recognizes the kappa molecules present on the tumor cells. For this study, the kappa antibody has been changed so that instead of floating free in the blood it is now joined to the T cells. When an antibody is joined to a T cell in this way it is called a chimeric receptor. These chimeric receptor-T cells seem to kill some of the tumor, but they don't last very long and so their chances of fighting the cancer are limited. In the laboratory, investigators found that T cells work better if they also add a protein that stimulates T cells to grow called CD28. By joining the anti-kappa antibody to the T cells and adding the CD28, the investigators expect to be able to make cells that will last for a longer time in the body (because of the presence of the CD28). They are hoping this will make the cells work better. Previously, when patients enrolled on this study, they were assigned to one of three different doses of the kappa-CD28 T cells. We found that all three dose levels are safe. Now, the plan is to give patients the highest dose that we tested. These chimeric T cells (kappa-CD28) are an investigational product not approved by the FDA.

The intended study is designed as a a phase IV pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial, comparing the impact of two different therapies including ASA vs. Rivaroxaban in newly diagnosed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients treated with Lenalidomide Dexamethasone (Len-Dex) combination therapy. The pilot feasibility study was conducted in preparation for this randomized controlled trial designed to assess the effect of an intervention.

This is an open-label, single center trial of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) with nivolumab in multiple myeloma patients to determine the efficacy and safety of ASCT and PD1 inhibitor combination. For this purpose, 30 multiple myeloma patients, who have received induction therapy and have achieved a partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or progression, and thus have unfavorable prognosis, will be treated with nivolumab administered iv at a dose of 100 mg on days 3 before and 17 after high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation.

This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of CS1-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy after chemotherapy in treating patients who have CS1 positive multiple myeloma that has come back (relapsed) or does not respond to treatment (refractory). Immune cells can be engineered to kill multiple myeloma cells by inserting a piece of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) into the immune cells using a lentiviral vector such as CS1, that allows them to recognize multiple myeloma cells. These engineered immune cells, CS1-CAR T cells, may kill multiple myeloma cells.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCAR-B38M chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells.

Clinical trial applying CURATE.AI, a Phenotypic Precision Medicine (PPM) platform, to Bortezomib, Thalidomide, Cyclophosphamide and Lenalidomide dosing in multiple myeloma patients to show improvement in response.

In this protocol, the investigators hypothesize that the combination of intravenous busulfan and melphalan with carfilzomib will be an effective preparative regimen with acceptable toxicity for participants with multiple myeloma who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation. To test this hypothesis, the investigators designed a phase I/II trial combining IV busulfan 130 mg/m2 plus melphalan 140 mg combined with escalating doses of carfilzomib ranging from 20 mg/m2 to 45 mg/m2. These results will be compared with the center's historical controls of participants treated with melphalan, busulfan and bortezomib.

This is a Phase 1/2, multi-centre, single-arm, open-label, dose-escalation study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of IV GSK2857916 in combination with PO pomalidomide and low-dose PO dexamethasone in subjects with relapsed and/or refractory MM.

Study design: Randomised, controlled, multi-centre, open-label, phase III trial (with a single intervention registration phase). Primary Objectives The primary objectives of this study are to determine: The impact on Depth of Response (DoR: less than VGPR versus VGPR or better) when salvage ASCT conditioning is augmented by the addition of a proteasome inhibitor The influence of a consolidation and maintenance strategy on the Durability of Response (DuR:PFS) Secondary objectives The secondary objectives of this study are to determine: Overall survival Time to disease progression The overall response rate following ixazomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (ITD) re-induction Time to next treatment Progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) Duration of response Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negative rate post re-induction, post-ASCT and conversion after ITD consolidation Engraftment kinetics Toxicity and safety Quality of life (QoL) Participant population (refer to protocol section 9 for a full list of eligibility criteria). Relapsed MM (with measurable disease by IMWG criteria) previously treated with ASCT First progressive disease (PD) at least 12 months since first ASCT, requiring therapy. ECOG Performance Status 0-2 Aged at least 18 years Adequate full blood count and renal, hepatobiliary, pulmonary and cardiac function Written informed consent Interventions: All participants will be registered at trial entry and will receive re-induction therapy with 4-6, 28-day cycles of ixazomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (ITD), in order to reach maximum response. Participants who achieve at least stable disease (SD) will be randomised on a 1:1 basis to receive either conventional ASCT (ASCTCon), using melphalan, or augmented ASCT (ASCTAug), using melphalan with ixazomib. All participants achieving or maintaining a minimal response (MR) or better following trial ASCT will undergo a second randomisation to consolidation and maintenance or no further treatment. Participants randomised to consolidation and maintenance will receive treatment as follows: consolidation with 2 cycles of ITD and maintenance with ixazomib until disease progression. Number of participants: 406 participants will be registered into the trial to allow 284 participants to be randomised at the first randomisation (R1) and 248 participants to be randomised at the second randomisation (R2).

The work proposed herein aims to provide the first prospective, randomized comparative efficacy data between Melphalan and BEAM treatment regimen in the Multiple Myeloma (MM) patient population. The risk of such a study is deemed reasonable and ethical since: a) previous works have closely examined the safety and toxicity of the BEAM regimen and the doses to be delivered in this protocol are well below the toxicity levels; b) phase III trials of BEAM have provided reasonable data regarding the efficacy in lymphomas c) Early, retrospective data suggests that BEAM may be efficacious in MM however due to the lack of prospective controlled randomized clinical trial, there is adequate equipoise regarding its efficacy and moreover its comparative efficacy in relation to Melphalan and; D) there are known limitations in the standard-of-care for MM, Melphalan, namely, relatively low rates of complete response at the time of Autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) and poor progression free survival.