Active clinical trials for "Prostatic Neoplasms"

Background: It is not fully understood why prostate cancer in some men becomes androgen-independent (no longer responds to anti-androgen medication), but genetics likely plays an important role. Genes contain the hereditary information that is passed down from parents to children. Although everyone has the same set of genes, individuals can have different forms of the same gene. Differences in genes may explain, at least in part, why some people develop a more aggressive form of prostate cancer than others. Objectives: -To obtain blood samples from patients with prostate cancer to try to identify gene differences associated with progression to the androgen independent state. Eligibility: -All participants participating in NCI prostate cancer protocols. Design: Participants with prostate cancer are evaluated in the NCI s Medical Oncology Clinic. Blood samples are collected at the initial visit or at follow-up visits. DNA (genetic material) and white blood cells are extracted from these samples to be used for genotyping and establishment of cell lines. Gene variations are correlated with prostate cancer prognosis and prognostic indicators.

The objective of the study is to evaluate the predictive value of TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion and PTEN in patients with high risk prostate cancer treated with first line LHRH agonist after biochemical failure.

The preferred method for early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in older men with family history is the Prostate Specific Antigen test (PSA test), although the method is imprecise. It produces a high number of false-positive results and increases the risk of over-diagnosis and over-treatment. Yet, an increasing number of men get the PSA test as part of unsystematic screening. Genetic risk assessment may be a better way to identify men with low risk of PCa. The main study hypothesis is that genetic information about low risk of PCa can reduce the number of patients who get a PSA test as part of unsystematic screening.

We are the missing link in clinical trials, connecting patients and researchers seamlessly and conveniently using a mobile health platform to advance medical research. We make it easy for patients to contribute to research for medical conditions that matter most to them, regardless of their location or ability to travel.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a 16-week supervised, clinic-based circuit training intervention utilizing resistance and functional exercises and self-directed aerobic exercise will improve frailty and sarcopenic status and disease progression outcomes among pre-frail/frail metastatic prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The names of the study intervention involved in this study is: • Supervised circuit training (aerobic and resistance exercise regimen)

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the feasibility of adding a combination of metformin and turmeric as part of a nutritional intervention regimen to the current standard of care, namely, intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy (iADT), for patients with castration sensitive biochemical progressive prostate cancer. The main objectives are: Assess the feasibility of the study population and enrollment. Evaluate time to PSA relapse with nutritional intervention on iADT. Participants who are receiving iADT will be dispensed Metformin and turmeric and complete a pill diary. Participants will also have blood and stool samples collected and complete quality of life questionnaires. The long-term goal is to further assess the efficacy and safety of this nutritional regimen and the roles of metabolic syndrome, microenvironment/microbiome, and genomic vs epigenomic profiles in the care of these patients through a clinical trial.

The study investigates the influence of structured follow-up using ePROMS in the 1st year after prostatectomy on the postoperative course. It will be examined whether this intervention leads to early detection of postoperative symptoms and whether the subsequent initiation of further measures lead to an improvement of incontinence, symptom burden, quality of life and patient competence.

Around 375,000 cancers are diagnosed in the UK annually, with this figure expected to reach 500,000 by 2035. As the number of different cancer treatment options and our scientific understanding continue to grow rapidly, it can be difficult for clinicians to keep up-to-date with best practice, causing unjustified variations in the quality of care and clinical outcomes for patients. Currently, when a patient has been referred to and seen by a clinician, their treatment is then discussed in a Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting (MDTM). MDTM is a meeting of medical experts, including Surgeons, Oncologists, Nurses, and specialists in cancer, imaging and diagnosis. This is the case even if a treatment decision is straightforward. A nationwide review published by CRUK in 2017 highlighted the demands on cancer teams and the MDTM process: Increased caseloads are causing dramatic increases in the time spent by clinicians in MDTMs, leading to an unsustainable rise in costs: the cost in England has increased from £88m to £159m in 4 years; There is not enough time in the MDTM to discuss complex cases; There is a failure to involve patients in the decision-making process: around 75% of patients feel their views are unrepresented in MDTMs; In our study we are looking at the potential of technology - particularly Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) - to improve MDTM decision making. Deontics has a CE marked AI-based CDSS that integrates individual patient data and preferences with evidence-based clinical guidelines. This dynamically and transparently generates best-practice, individualised treatment recommendations which can help determine treatment. Deontics' AI tool has already been shown to provide personalised recommendations concordant with UK best practice while incorporating patient values, and can be used to safely triage less complex patients straight to treatment with minimal clinical oversight. Our project partners with Deontics to develop PROSAIC-DS - A CDSS for prostate cancer.

The goal of this research study is to conduct an open pilot of a behavioral change intervention called PROstate Cancer Wearables, Exercise, and Structured Supports (PROWESS) for integrating health behavior change tools and to increase exercise, reduce side effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and improve quality of life in Black and Hispanic/Latino men with prostate cancer. The name of the intervention used in this research study is: PROWESS (behavioral change intervention)

It is evident that patients receiving treatment for cancer have symptoms that often are undetected. Furthermore, many survivors from cancer have ongoing poor health and well-being and long-term rehabilitation and support should not be neglected to prevent recurrence and increase survival. There are good reasons to believe that routine collection of relevant patient-reported symptoms facilitates a person-centered care where the patient is a participatory member in the team. This study aims to evaluate the effects of routine assessment of diagnose-related symptoms assisted with an app during the first year of survivor ship in patients with prostate cancer in combination with survivor ship care coached by a district nurse, in primary health care and compare it to standard care only. The hypothesis is improved symptom burden and improved quality of life.