search

Active clinical trials for "Prostatic Neoplasms"

Results 221-230 of 5298

EBRT + Lu-PSMA for N1M0 Prostate Cancer

Prostatic Neoplasm

The PROQURE project aims to provide prostate cancer patients with more cure and better quality of life. The first part of this project (PROQURE-1) aims to explore an innovative combined modality treatment strategy for patients with node-positive prostate cancer (N1M0). The current standard of care for these patients, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) of the prostate and regional pelvic nodes combined with 2-3 years androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), leads to suboptimal tumor control while inducing significant and potentially persistent toxicity. To overcome this, the current locoregional treatment is complemented with systemic Lutetium-177-PSMA radioligand therapy in a phase I study, with the aim to achieve better tumor control while potentially reducing or obviating ADT and its associated toxicity for future patients.

Recruiting21 enrollment criteria

177Lu-PSMA-I&T for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Metastasis From Malignant Tumor of Prostate

A Multi-Center, Open-Label, Randomized Phase 3 Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-I&T versus Hormone Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Recruiting48 enrollment criteria

TherApeutics in Early ProState Cancer (TAPS02)

Prostate Cancer

This is a phase 3, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigating the use of short term androgen deprivation therapy in the form of apalutamide (Erleada) in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Recruiting36 enrollment criteria

PRCT001 Aquablation theraPy Outcomes in pRostate Cancer patienTs

Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaLocalized Prostate Cancer

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the performance and safety of the AQUABEAM Robotic System for the resection and removal of prostate tissue in patients experiencing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and are diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. Participants will go through baseline and follow up assessments up to 12 months.

Recruiting7 enrollment criteria

Two-fraction Versus Five-fraction Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

PROSTATE CANCER

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two dose schedules of stereotactic radiation therapy in patients with localized prostate cancer. Historically, external beam radiation to treat localized prostate cancer was given in small treatments over a period of multiple weeks. Recent studies have shown that with newer technologies and better understanding of how prostate cancer responds to radiation, the same effective dose can be given in as few as 5 treatments. This study is comparing this newer standard course of 5 treatments with an even shorter course of just 2 treatments. The dose for the 2 treatments is based on a form of internal radiation called brachytherapy, but in this study, that dose will be given using external radiation, without the need for invasive procedures. In order to make sure that the radiation therapy is given in a way that minimizes the risk of side effects to the surrounding organs, including the rectum and bladder, prior to radiation a hydrogel material will be inserted behind the prostate in order to distance the rectum further from the prostate gland, and small gold markers will be inserted into the prostate to decrease any possible movement during treatment. The main questions are whether 2-treatment radiation is tolerated as well and is as effective at treating prostate cancer, compared to the standard 5-treatment course of radiation.

Recruiting20 enrollment criteria

UroLift System With SAbR for Prostate Cancer and BPH

Prostate Cancer

Confirming safety of combining UroLift System prior to SAbR for patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and a history of BPH, by measuring the acute complication rate of UroLift System implant in patients with BPH undergoing SAbR (within 90 days of treatment completion)

Recruiting24 enrollment criteria

Biomarkers for Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer Positive by 18FDG-PET...

Prostate Cancer

Various approaches are currently being developed for prostate cancer immunotherapy. However, a major challenge facing the development of cancer immunotherapy is the identification of tumors that would best respond to this type of treatment. Different studies suggest that prostate cancer more likely to progress are more infiltrated by exhausted T cells expressing the cell surface protein PD1 (Programmed cell death 1). Therefore, there is a strong rationale for selecting patients at higher risk of progression for testing the efficacy of anti-PD1 therapy. High glucose metabolism as detected by fludeoxyglucose F18 (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) (18FDG-PET) imagery is an innovative biological biomarker-based method to identify patients at higher risk of recurrence and early failure to hormonotherapy. Recent study demonstrated that high intra-prostatic 18-FDG-uptake was associated with higher Gleason grades. Therefore the one third of Gleason ≥ 8 prostate cancer patients with higher 18FDG uptake would be ideal candidates for early immunotherapy treatments based on anti-PD-1 such as pembrolizumab. The study aimed to identify biomarkers predictive the response to Pembrolizumab given prior to radical prostatectomy in participants with primary prostate cancer at high risk of progression.

Recruiting25 enrollment criteria

PROstate Cancer TReatment Optimization Via Analysis of Circulating Tumour DNA

Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)

The purpose of this study is to assess the strategy in treatment selection using ctDNA fraction as a predictive biomarker to direct treatment decision (ctDNA fraction <2% receives enzalutamide, and ctDNA fraction ≥2% receives docetaxel) versus clinician's choice of enzalutamide or docetaxel, in subjects with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer post abiraterone setting.

Recruiting33 enrollment criteria

Focal Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Focal Low-Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

Prostate Cancer

Short-term Efficacy of Transperineal Laser Ablation (TPLA) with Image Fusion and Multi-parametric (mpMRI) Follow-up in Focal Low-intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer. It is an interventional pilot study. The clinical evaluation will be carried out at different times as follows: Time 0: recruitment and eligibility assessment (patient selection) Time 1: interview, signing of informed consent and enrollment Time 2: FLA treatment and control with multiparametric MRI of the post-procedural prostate. Time 3-4-5-6: follow up to 1 (T3), 6 (T4), 12 (T5) and 24 (T6) months from the procedure. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the short-term (2 years) efficacy of FLA treatment of low-intermediate risk prostate cancer Secondary objective is to investigate multiparametric prostate MRI as a follow-up diagnostic investigation, evaluating possible glandular morphostructural changes and their correlation with clinical data.

Recruiting17 enrollment criteria

Hemiablative Focal Brachytherapy Pilot Study

Prostate Cancer

Whole gland LDR brachytherapy has been a well established modality of treating low risk prostate cancer. Treatment in a focal manner has the advantages of reduced toxicity to surrounding organs. AIM: To determine the utility of focal LDR brachytherapy in form of hemiablative treatment for localized prostate cancer demonstrating the feasibility of the delivery of the prescription dose to the half of the prostate in terms of meeting standard dosimetric parameters while respecting same or lower tolerance doses of adjacent normal organs. To determine acute and late rectal, urinary and sexual toxicity after this procedure. To assess the change from baseline in QOL indicators at specific time intervals using validated international questionnaires [International Prostate Symptom Score ( IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function ( IIEF ), Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC)] after this treatment. To evaluate the local tumour control in terms of biopsy outcomes after focal brachytherapy 36 months after the treatment. To compare target coverage and relative doses to the rectum and the urethra for the same patient performing a hemigland treatment planning vs Whole gland treatment planning. STUDY DESIGN: Multi-institution prospective trial to determine whether hemiablative treatment with LDR for prostate cancer is dosimetrically safe and feasible.This study will record data for 20 patients with ipsilateral with low and low tier intermediate risk disease.The study will record quality of life parameters in particular in terms of urinary, rectal and sexual function side effects. INTERVENTION: Baseline Transperineal Template guided mapping prostate biopsy with >20 cores (not required if already performed) Multiparametric MRI within the 3 months prior to registration and at 18 & 36 months. Hemigland prostate region will be targeted with the prescription dose and receive 144 Gy of Iodine125 (I125). The quality of life assessment will focus on erectile function, urinary function, bowel function, and general health related quality of life Postimplant CT Planning day 30 after the implant for quality assurance. MEASUREMENT OF ENDPOINTS : Dosimetric parameters record, Toxicity and QOL evaluation forms, PSA follow up and biopsies at 36 months to assess local control.

Recruiting25 enrollment criteria
1...222324...530

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs