Active clinical trials for "Rectal Neoplasms"

The objective of this study is to investigate whether the use of Human Peritoneal Membrane (HPM) in a temporary loop ileostomy is beneficial to patients. Benefit will be defined, for purposes of this study, as a decrease in adhesions resulting in decreased operative time during ileostomy closure, with promotion of peritoneal remodeling.

The main objective of this randomized trial is to compare 5FU/LV (Mayo-Clinic regimen or LV5FU2) to LV5FU2 + irinotécan in patients with resected B2 and C rectal cancer. Preoperative radiotherapy is recommended but not mandatory. Main endpoint is disease free survival. Secondary endpoint are overall survival, time to local recurrence, time to distant metastases, and tolerance. A total of 600 patients will be included in the trial.

COLOR II is a randomized, international, multi center study comparing the outcomes of laparoscopic and conventional resection of rectal carcinoma below 15 cm with curative intent. Clinical and operative data will be collected centrally in the coordinating centre in Halifax, Canada. Quality of life and costs will be assessed on a national basis.

During the laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer, transecting the mobilized rectum in the narrow pelvic was difficult and sometimes need 2-3 reloads of the endoscopic linear cutter. also the angles between the 2-3 staple line threaten the next anastomosis. this study was to explore the Cable Tie to facilitate the transection of rectum and decline the usage of the reloads.

Rectal cancer is one of the frequent malignant neoplasms ,Total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the gold standard treatment for middle and lower rectal cancers. Laparoscopic TME still be difficult in patients with low rectal tumors, narrow pelvic anatomy, male sex or high body mass index . Difficult visualization of the pelvic anatomy along with the limitation of rigid laparoscopic instruments may affect the quality of oncological outcomes and increase the risks of injuries during surgery. A down to up approach via transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) technique may overcome these problems

A prospective study is planned for management of low rectal cancer with the aim of sphincter preservation and improving the oncological outcome of the patients, through comparing of both approaches minimally invasive techniques including transanal total mesorectal excision and laparoscopic intersphincteric resection.

This study will randomly assign 220 men and women to either a social media intervention or a standard reminder system to have a repeat screening test for colo-rectal cancer.

Digital rectal examination is an act clinically performed daily by physicians and surgeons. It remains the key diagnostic test and directs the therapeutic management of cancer of the lower and middle rectum. It can be done in two main positions: lateral decubitus, and supine. However, no randomized study in colorectal surgery is not interested in evaluating the best position to perform a full rectal exam.

This is a study that compares two types of surgery for rectal cancer. There are two procedures that can be used during this surgery, conventional abdominal resection (APR) and extended (or extralevator) APR. The investigators are doing this research to see whether the extralevator APR increases the likelihood that the edge of the tissue that is removed will be more likely to be free from cancer cells compared with the conventional APR surgery. At this time there is no evidence that one type of procedure is better at this than the other. The objective of this research is to determine whether extralevator APR is more likely to have clean margins (free of cancer) compared to the standard APR surgery.

In elderly patients postoperative mortality measured 3-6 months after total mesorectal excision is high. Thus, less toxic treatments may lead to a survival benefit for elderly patients even if a risk of local recurrence is slightly higher compared to the open surgery. The investigators addressed the question whether watch and wait policy is safe in clinical complete responders after (chemo)radiation for elderly patients with small or moderately advanced tumours.