High Versus Low Power Settings During Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy
Renal StoneThe primary aim of the study is to compare the operative times following ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones with Thulium Fiber Laser using low and high power settings. Secondary aims are to compare the results of low and high power settings in terms of stone free rates, laser time, laser activation patterns, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Patients ≥ 18 years with renal stones (8-25 mm) scheduled for ureteroscopic lithotripsy at the Day Surgery Clinic at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Norway, are eligible for inclusion in the study. After written consent and inclusion, patients are randomised to laser lithotripsy using either low power settings (Group 1: 4-6 Watt, short pulse mode) or high power settings (Group 2: 16-18 Watt, short pulse mode). The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in general anaesthesia using a standardised technique. All patients are followed up with a low dose CT scan 3 months post endoscopically to assess stone free status as well as a consultation at the outpatient clinic. Results and data for the two randomisation groups are compared according to the aims of the study.
SOUND Pivotal Trial - (Sonomotion stOne comminUtion resoNance ultrasounD)
Kidney StoneUrolithiasis5 moreThe goal of this clinical trial is to test the Break Wave™ system in patients with upper urinary tract stones. The main question it aims to answer is whether the device is safe and effective in fragmenting (breaking) stones. Participants will a) undergo the Break Wave™ procedure, b) have a telehealth visit at 2 weeks, and c) return for an imaging study at approximately 10 weeks post-procedure.
Ureteroscopic Laser Modality on Total Lasing Time and Total Energy in Patients With Large, Dense...
Renal CalculiThis study will examine the effects of ureteroscopic lasing technique (dusting, fragmentation and a hybrid approach) on total lasing time and total energy in patients with a large renal calculi burden of single or multiple stones with the sum of its longest diameters between 10-20 mm and having mean Hounsfield units of 1000 or more.
Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery Versus Multi-Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex...
StoneKidneyThe aim of this study is to compare outcomes of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) with the multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of complex renal stones.
RIRS for Treatment of Stones in Congenital Anomalous Kidneys
Renal CalculiRenal AnomalyThe anatomic renal abnormalities like altered spatial relations with adjacent organs, abnormal calyceal orientation, and anomalous vascular patterns make the active treatment of stones in the congenitally malformed kidney a great challenge for urologists. In this prospective study, the investigators will evaluate the outcome of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for the treatment of stones in the kidneys with rotation or position anomalies.
A Comparison of Ureteroscopic Treatment of Nephrolithiasis With and Without Moses Technology
NephrolithiasisFlexible ureteroscopy is characterized as first-line therapy for the treatment of renal stones < 2 cm in size. This involves passing a flexible endoscope into the renal pelvis through the urethra, bladder and ureter in a retrograde fashion. Holmium: YAG laser remains the preferred energy modality to subsequently break stones of this size into fragments small enough to remove or pass spontaneously through the ureter. Advances in the understanding of laser energy delivery have led to the recent commercialization of the "Moses Effect" - the creation of vapor bubbles/cavities between the laser fiber tip and the target through which laser energy can more efficiently travel. Lumenis was the first to optimize this laser phenomenon and market it as "Moses Technology" in their Lumenis Pulse P120H laser system. This system is already FDA approved through the 510K pathway and is commercially available. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential of Moses laser technology to reduce operative time compared to non-Moses settings for ureteroscopic treatment of nephrolithiasis.
Obesity and Uric Acid Stones Study
ObesityUric Acid Stones2 moreThe investigator proposes an 18 month, feasibility pilot study, randomizing obese and diabetic individuals with pure uric acid nephrolithiasis (UAN) or mixed calcium oxalate (CO) UAN to either phentermine/topiramate or a pragmatic control group who will remain on their standard medication regimen (citrate salts, allopurinol, diet, etc.).
MIP Versus PCNL for Kidney Stone Disease
Kidney StoneThe decision to use standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) has been a subject of much debate in the urological community. The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to compare the operative outcomes and complications of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) versus standard PCNL for renal stones. The results of this study will help guide the decision making regarding these two procedures in the US population and provide further insight into the utility and safety of these procedures. A cost analysis will be performed, and it is hypothesized that the reusable components of the Storz MIP set will result in lower costs of the mini-PCNL procedure compared to standard PCNL.
MOSES Lithotripsy Technology Applied to Stone Fragmentation During Ureteroscopy
Kidney CalculiTo determine if the effects of MOSES laser modulation technology can improve the safety and efficiency to laser fragmentation resulting in decreased total laser time, reduced potential for injury to the patient, and total OR time and utilization.
Ambulatory Versus Inpatient Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Kidney CalculiThe goal of the study is to determine if ambulatory tubeless PCNL is safe and effective compared to inpatient PCNL with a nephrostomy tube.