Active clinical trials for "Neuralgia"

To explore the pathogenesis underlying neuropathic pain as well as the mechanisms of pain relief after Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) Central Lateral Thalamotomy through multi-model MRI study, and to identify imaging biomarkers for triaging patients and predicting the clinical outcomes. Craniofacial neuropathic pain is one of the most serious debilitating symptoms, leading to emotional disorders and poor quality of life. Previous studies have shown that Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) central lateral thalamotomy is a minimally invasive and effective procedure for medication-refractory neuropathic pain patients. However, the clinical benefits were variable among individuals. It is important to clarify the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain and the mechanisms of pain relief induced by MRgFUS central lateral thalamotomy to triage suitable candidates for the procedure and predict clinical outcomes. In addition, localization precision and individualized treatment remain to be improved.

Brief summary: This single-arm, pilot clinical investigation aims to evaluate Mindful SensoriMotor Therapy (MSMT) enhanced with brain modulation as a treatment of pain due to sensorimotor impairment, such as Phantom Limb Pain (PLP). MSMT consists of consciously retraining the motor and sensory networks used by the missing limb via myoelectric pattern recognition and haptic feedback. In this trial, we further enhance the effect of MSMT by brain modulation, transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).

The aim of this study is to determine what patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN), clinicians and researchers in the field, consider to be the most important outcomes to be expected after undergoing treatment for trigeminal neuralgia and how this could be measured in all studies relating to this condition. This would enable different treatments to be compared using the same standards.

This is an open-label, non-comparative, non-interventional, prospective, and multi-center PMS study to observe safety and effectiveness of Lyrica CR (82.5mg, 165mg, 330mg) in Korean subjects under the actual condition of use. PMS is an obligation to K-MFDS.

Given the widespread use of anticonvulsants in the pediatric chronic pain population and the absence of scientific data supporting their use, the investigators propose a randomized, double blind, two group parallel design in which a broad group of children and adolescents with chronic neuropathic pain would be randomized to receive either Gabapentin or Oxcarbazepine. The Primary Aim of the Study is to assess the frequencies of successful treatment of pediatric patients with neuropathic pain treated with either Gabapentin or Oxcarbazepine. The Primary Hypotheses are as follows: Hypothesis I: Both Gabapentin and Oxcarbazepine will result in significant reduction in pain scores when compared to each patient's baseline. Hypothesis II: Patients who continue on active drug (Gabapentin or Oxcarbazepine) during the second phase of the trial will report greater pain reduction relative to baseline than patients who are randomized onto placebo at this randomization point. Secondary Aims of the Study are to compare groups treated initially with Gabapentin or Oxcarbazepine with regard to reduction in pain scores (both at rest and with evoked maneuvers), functional disability scores, tolerability, and measures of mood and cognitive functioning. Secondary Hypotheses are that Gabapentin and Oxcarbazepine differ in their effects on: Pain scores at rest and with evoked maneuvers Functional disability scores Tolerability (frequencies of side-effects) Depression and anxiety scales Neuropsychological measures of cognitive processing speed, working memory, and attention.

This is a randomized, double blind, single-center, clinical trial. The study will be conducted over a period of 6 months. The study will be conducted at the Allevio Pain Clinic, Toronto, Canada.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Praga formulation in the treatment of neuropathic pain.

The investigators will select two study groups from a population of patients with severe chronic low back pain (CLBP) of facet joint (FJ) origin already treated with conventional radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus (MBDR) and that failed to obtain a 50% pain reduction measured through the numerical rate scale (NRS) for at least 3 months. Severe CLBP is considered a value of at least 7 by NRS pain assessment. The first group will be characterized by a nociceptive/mechanic type of back pain. The second group of study will be characterized by a neuropathic type of back pain. This difference will be established by a DN4 score of at least 4 points (Doleur Neurophatique 4). The patients in the group with nociceptive/mechanic back pain will be randomly assigned to conventional radiofrequency ablation or to water cooled radiofrequency (WCRF) of the MBDR. The patients in the group with neuropathic back pain will be randomly assigned CRFA of MBDR or to pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). The study will be carried on for an estimated time of 3 years. Primary outcomes will be: at least 50% back pain reduction for at least 3 months evaluated through NRS, with a subcategorization of results that will consider a mean difference in effect (respect to the initial evaluation, with an initial NRS score of at least 7) of 1 point on NRS pain scale as small/modest, 2 points as moderate, more than 2 as large/substantial between the case/control study groups. improvement of low back pain disability: 10 points increase on the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI) have been proposed as minimal clinically important differences, between 10 and 20 as moderate, more than 20 as large/substantial clinical improvement at month 3 and 6. Secondary outcome will be evaluated by the 12-item short form survey SF12, accordingly with the clinical pre-interventional findings, analgesic intake at month 1-3-6 (if increased, unchanged, decreased, in dosages or number of pain killers' assumption). Groups sizes: will be calculated based on the disease's incidence and the outcome targets.

Chronic postsurgical pain following lung cancer surgery is common with and 20-60 % develop chronic pain which persists more than six months after surgery. Causes and health impact of this pain have been comprehensively studied. Current treatment consists of combination of pain medication, physiotherapy and psychological therapy. Botulinum Toxin A (BTX-A) has shown promising effects in a variety of chronic postsurgical pain syndromes. The use of BTX-A in lung cancer patients has only been presented in few case reports. No randomized controlled trials (RCT) have been executed to date. Study objectives: Determine recruitment potential among cured lung cancer patients with chronic postsurgical pain for an RCT and if the method of BTX-A administration is feasible and acceptable. Further more, this study will contribute to the stage testing of the hypothesis that chronic pain following thoracic surgery can be treated with BTX-A. Methods: Recruitment of test subjects: Participiants are recruited among former lung cancer patients with chronic postsurgical pain, who have undergone radical treatment for lung cancer at the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital. Potential test subjects are invited by mail / e-mail. Randomization and blinding: Participants are randomized to receive a single series of subcutaneous injections with either Onabotulinum Toxin A (active agent) or inactive normal saline (Placebo) at the former operation site. Neither participant nor investigator will know which treatment is given until the end of the trial. Data collection: Data is collected by questionnaires delivered and answered by mail or digitally. Data on the possible effects and possible adverse reactions are collected at multiple times until three months after treatment.

Several studies have shown the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in reducing the intensity of neuropathic pain. This efficacy is defined as obtaining relief of at least 50% of the preoperative pain intensity assessed by the visual analog scale or the digital pain scale. No study has evaluated the efficacy of stimulation specifically on the different components of neuropathic pain, only an overall improvement in pain has been described. A specific questionnaire for neuropathic pain has been extensively validated in neuropathic pain: the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). Thanks to the multidimensional structure of this questionnaire, investigators propose to evaluate separately and in a much more specific way the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in the short and long term on the different components of neuropathic pain and to define responders subgroups.