Active clinical trials for "Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction"

The goal of this prospective study is to evaluate the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The main endpoint is the reclassification rate, defined as the number of patients in whom the information provided by pre-angiography CMR affects the revascularization strategy or the final diagnosis. Participants will undergo to CMR before invasive coronary angiography (ICA).

Non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) represents 70-75% of all myocardial infarctions. Current guidelines recommend invasive angiography and this patient group represents a major burden on the invasive catheterization laboratories and the health care system. The coronary pathology found in NSTEMI-patients varies substantially, ranging from structurally normal vessels, non-obstructive atherosclerosis to severe multivessel disease. 30-40 % of patients with NSTEMI undergoing invasive coronary angiography do not undergo revascularization. If these patients could be identified by a non-invasive method like coronary CT angiography (CCTA), an invasive procedure with the potential risk for complications could be avoided. Furthermore, less patients would need transfer to an invasive center. Both for patients and for health care costs this would be of major benefit. The quality of CCTA images has improved during the years, and radiation dose has decreased. Due to technological development it is now possible to perform high quality coronary CCTA with a very low radiation dose (1-1.5 mSv) compared to a radiation dose of 3-4 mSv for invasive coronary angiography. The overall aim of the project is to define a subpopulation of NSTEMI patients that preferably should undergo CCTA as the first step in imaging of the coronary arteries and thus potentially be saved from an unnecessary invasive investigation. This would result in less patient discomfort, less patient risk and reduced health care costs. Patients with a clinical indication for invasive angiography according to current guidelines will undergo CCTA prior to the invasive investigation. The ability of CCTA to identify those with no need for revascularization will be assessed using invasive angiography as the gold standard.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, phase 2 clinical study in patients with NSTEMI undergoing urgent coronary angiography. Approximately 220 patients with CKD and acute NSTEMI, who are scheduled for an urgent coronary angiography (within 72 hours after admission and/or diagnosis of NSTEMI).

Long-term beta-blocker therapy has not been investigated in contemporary randomized clinical trials in patients with myocardial infarction and normal heart function. The aim of this study is to determine whether long-term treatment with oral beta-blockade in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved left ventricular systolic ejection fraction reduces the composite of death of any cause or new myocardial infarction..

Background and rationale: Evaluating patients with acute chest pain, elevated high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) levels and non-diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG), i.e. suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI), is a daily challenge. Although contemporary hs-cTn assay-based algorithms have greatly facilitated clinical decision-making, still one-quarter of patients is categorized as 'observe' group and in whom a diagnosis initially remains unknown. Although routinely treated as acute (MI) with referral to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), up to one-third does not have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has been shown to be a very useful diagnostic tool in this setting but is not part of routine clinical care in every patient. Objectives: To investigate in patients with suspected non-ST elevation MI meeting the 'observe' criteria and who are scheduled for ICA: 1) the prevalence of coronary artery disease as well as non-coronary artery disease related and extra-cardiac diseases by adding CMR early in the diagnostic pathway, and 2) the number of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and a composite of MACE and major (non-cardiac) adverse events after 30 days and one year. These objectives allow an accurate estimate of the number of potentially avoidable ICA in the future and whether early CMR could be a safe gatekeeper for inappropriate ICA. Study population and design: In this prospective, observational two-center study in The Netherlands (MUMC+ and VieCuri Medical Center), 87 consecutive patients with acute chest pain, non-diagnostic ECG and hs-cTn levels meeting the observe criteria and scheduled for ICA, will be investigated. Patients will undergo a comprehensive CMR examination prior to ICA and will be followed-up at one month and one year. After completion of follow-up, an independent clinical diagnosis committee will adjudicate a final diagnosis: at discharge and after one year. The final diagnosis at discharge will be adjudicated twice: once with and once without considering the results of CMR. For the diagnosis at one-year, all clinical variables and CMR results will be considered. MACE and complications will be scored after 30 days and one year. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is the prevalence of coronary artery disease as well as non-coronary artery disease related and extra-cardiac diseases. The secondary (safety) endpoint is the number of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and a composite of MACE and major (non-cardiac) adverse events after 30 days and one year. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: CMR is an accepted and safe imaging modality in patients with (suspected) non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Despite the year-on-year decrease, coronary artery disease (CAD) still remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. With advances in technology and our understanding of cardiac disease, we can now treat CAD using minimally invasive interventional techniques. This has revolutionised treatment for and improved the lives of many patients with CAD. Although trials have assessed various therapeutic strategies in various populations, real-world evidence of intervention and medical treatment among patients with CAD is increasingly recognised as an important part of providing safety and efficacy data and improving the care we provide. Regional heart attack services have improved clinical outcomes following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by facilitating early reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Early discharge after primary PCI is welcomed by patients and increases the efficiency of health care. This data will add to that literature by assessing the characteristics and outcomes of patients with CAD, concentrating on those who are discharged via the early discharge pathway. It will also identify and characterise predictors of outcomes, and improve risk stratification and diagnostic evaluation.

Prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label trial to study whether multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior over culprit-lesion only PCI in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease.

Acute myocardial infarction owes to a plaque rupture resulting in total (STEMI) or partial occlusion (NSTEMI) of the coronary artery. In patients with a partial occlusion and multi vessel disease (MVD), identification of the lesion responsible for the current event (culprit) at the time of the examination (coronary angiogram, CAG) can be difficult. Meanwhile, identification of the culprit lesion is vital to conduct proper treatment. Furthermore, treating an artery with no plaque rupture (non-culprit), imposes a small risk for complications, which may be fatal. Precise identification of the culprit lesion in NSTEMI patients with MVD remains unsettled The purpose of this study is proper and precise identification of the culprit lesion in NSTEMI patients with MVD.

The purpose of this study is to determine the predictive capacity of the Pullback Pressure Gradient (PPG) index for post-PCI FFR and to determine the impact of the PPG index on clinical decision making about revascularization and on clinical outcomes.

the investigators aimed to analyzed data for hospitalized MI patients with normal ECG.