Active clinical trials for "Obesity, Morbid"

One possible angle for treating obesity could be slowing down the gastric emptying time. By prolonging the gastric emptying time, the person would ideally experience increased sensation of satiety, and in the long run reduce food intake. If such a treatment provides a clinically significant weight loss, this could be an alternative for surgical procedures, avoiding the risk for perioperative complications as well as complications in the long run. There are now several pilot studies documenting that intragastric treatment with botulinum toxin A (BTA) can be effective, although the treatment perspective is short and do not include repeated injections. However, they demonstrate that BTA-injections are safe for the patient. The treatment is administered by endoscopy.

The objectives of this study are to assess the initial safety and device functionality of the SFM Anastomosis System including delivery systems when used to create a dual-path duodenal-ileal (D-I) diversion either during sleeve gastrectomy (i.e., SNAP-S procedure) or patients with prior sleeve gastrectomy who experience inadequate weight loss (i.e., SNAP-PS procedure). Additionally, the study is designed to evaluate the potential of the SNAP-S/SNAP-PS procedures to induce weight loss and to improve metabolic comorbidities in obese subjects.

Study will monitor weight loss and metabolic indicators for subjects in single-center, single arm trial.

Bariatric guidelines recommend preoperative weight loss of 5% to reduce the risk of surgical complications. However, results in the literature on the improvement of surgical procedure and outcomes are still conflicting. This study aims to evaluate the effect of preoperative weight loss by means of a 14-day low-calorie diet in bariatric patients on operative time, the ease of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure and long-term weight loss in a real-life experimental setting.

According to the definition of the WHO, obesity is the abnormal or excessive accumulation of fat in the body. Laparoscopic operations; It is a popular choice for bariatric surgery. A study is planned to determine postoperative early mobilization, postoperative pain and hospital stay in patients hospitalized in Bariatric Surgery post-operative clinics.

This is a five-year, single arm, multi-center trial to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the Maestro Rechargeable System in treating obesity. The study will include an observational arm and a randomized sub-study.

Obesity is a major public health problem worldwide. Bariatric surgery has proved to be the most effective treatment of morbid obesity in terms of weight reduction and remission of co-morbid conditions during long-term follow-up. Nowadays, France is ranked 3rd in terms of bariatric surgeries performed per year. Since the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) was described in 1977, this restrictive and malabsorptive procedure has become a gold standard for morbid obesity with an average Excess Weight Loss % (EWL%) of 72% at 2 years, and a strong metabolic effect, especially with regard to type 2 diabetes remission. Nevertheless, failures are observed (up to 20%), particularly in super obese patients, which are then difficult to manage. In this population, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) is indicated due to its stronger weight loss and metabolic effect, but is still little performed worldwide because of its higher morbidity, surgical complexity and risk of malnutrition. A novel technique combining the physiological advantages of pylorus preservation and the technical benefits of single-loop reconstruction was introduced in 2007 by Sanchez-Pernaute, who described the single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) as an evolution of the BPD-DS. With a 2.5-meter common channel, SADI-S seems to offer good results for the treatment of both morbid obesity and its metabolic complications, with an EWL% of up to 95% at 2 years and potentially less nutritional consequences. To date, there is only one Spanish randomized trial comparing SADI-S to BPD-DS, whereas BPD-DS represents less than 1% of bariatric procedures in France and is only allowed in super obese patients. Thus only preliminary data of poor scientific value exists. Nevertheless, facing very encouraging short-term outcomes, there is a real need for a prospective trial comparing SADI-S to a standard bariatric procedure. The aim of the investigator's study is to assess weight loss efficiency and the morbi-mortality of the SADI-S in comparison to a standard (RYGB), in order to validate this procedure among bariatric techniques HYPOTHESIS SADI-S is superior to the standard RYGB for weight loss, increasing the EWL% by 10% (82% vs 72%, respectively) at 2 years.

To investigate the metabolic effects of a low carbohydrate versus energy-matched standard diet in morbidly obese individuals with prediabetes awaiting bariatric surgery.

Obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 and with a subclass of obesity known as morbid or severe obesity (BMI of ≥40 kg/m2). These are major issues in medicine for both participants and medical providers with >36% of the US population affected. Obesity is one of the biggest causes of preventable chronic diseases and healthcare costs in the USA. Obese adults spend 42% more on direct healthcare costs and morbidly obese adults overall have 81% higher healthcare costs than non-obese adults. Obesity is currently treated with dietary, pharmacological, and/or surgical approaches that are often unsuccessful or are associated with additional risks. As the incidence and prevalence of obesity and obesity-related diseases are steadily increasing, there is a growing need to detect the key risk factors involved in disease development and modify standard treatment procedures and protocols. The most successful long-term strategy continues to be bariatric and metabolic surgeries, such as sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). The NIH recommends bariatric surgery for participants with a BMI of 40 kg/m2 or greater or a BMI of 35 kg/m2 or greater and obesity related comorbidities. These surgeries enable participants to lose between 50% and 75% of excess body weight. Despite this success, participants are apprehensive and do not undergo bariatric surgery with the biggest fear being the many complications that come with the procedure. Studies have shown that 57-77% of participants are not interested in bariatric surgery although the participants qualify.(16) With the concern of complications from bariatric surgery, interest in endoscopic bariatric techniques has increased over the years. The techniques have been shown to be efficacious, reversible, relatively safe, and cost effective. Further, these techniques offer a therapeutic window for some participants who may otherwise be unable to undergo bariatric surgery. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have approved endoscopic procedures, such as balloon therapy, for participants with BMI in the 30-40 kg/m2 range.(17,18) However, the products used in these therapies also have several limitations primarily the inability to provide long term weight loss given the temporary nature of these balloons.(19) Common adverse events following intragastric balloon insertion include abdominal pain (33.7%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (18.3%), anorexia, and nausea (29%). Severe complications such as gastric ulcers (2%), small bowel obstruction (0.3%), perforation (0.1%), balloon migration (1.4%), and death (0.08%) are less common. Early balloon removal occurred in 9.1% of the study participants due to participant intolerance.(20) In a pilot study to assess safety and efficacy (BEAT Obesity), 20 morbidly obese participants with a BMI of ≥40 kg/m2 with no other comorbid conditions underwent bariatric embolization and were followed for 12 months. Participants were embolized with 300-500 µm Embospheres. None of the 20 participants in the BEAT Obesity trial (the largest prospective trial to date) had any major adverse events. Any gastric ulcers that occurred (40%) were asymptomatic and were completely healed by three months after the procedure.(21) There were many limitations of this study including the absence of a control cohort and non-compliance amongst study participants. A target population of participants with a BMI of 40 kg/m2 and above was too high considering the bariatric embolization procedure is comparable to endoscopic bariatric therapies rather than bariatric surgery. BEAT Obesity excluded participants with comorbidities, such as those who suffer from diabetes, who may greatly benefit from this procedure and are often the target population for endoscopic/surgical bariatric therapies. A larger bead size of 300-500 µm was specifically chosen compared to preclinical data and prior clinical reports due to concerns of gastric ischemia and ulceration. However, smaller bead size produces greater weight loss and hormonal shifts.(22) Investigators hypothesize that transvascular bariatric embolization results in safe and effective weight loss in obese participants compared to control subjects.

This is nationwide registry-based randomised clinical multicenter trial in which patients will be randomised to gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The co-primary endpoint are weight control over 5 years and the amount of severe adverse events. Additionally the investigators have predefined a number of secondary endpoints, and the trial has a sufficient number of patients to allow comparisons across subgroups.