Active clinical trials for "Labor Pain"

Patient controlled remifentanil analgesia might offer comparative overall patient satisfaction and improved quality of analgesia after normal labour with continuous epidural analgesia.

There are multiple factors that determine progress of normal vaginal delivery. Frequency, duration and strength of uterine contractions are important for progress throughout labor, and abdominal wall muscle contractions contribute to progress during the final stage. Epidural analgesia helps to alleviate the pain associated with uterine contractions, this however this comes at the expense of prolonging labor by reducing the strength of abdominal wall muscle contractions. The purpose of this prospective study is to quantify how much epidurals decrease the strength of abdominal wall contractions. Intraabdominal pressure will be used as surrogate to strength of abdominal wall contractions, and it will be measured via a foley catheter inserted into the urinary bladder as part of standard procedure for patients receiving labor epidurals. We will compare the change in intraabdominal pressure when patients perform forceful abdominal contractions (valsalva maneuvers) prior to and during epidural analgesia. This will lay the foundation for a future study in which we plan to compare the effects of different epidural analgesia types and concentrations on abdominal wall muscle contractions.

In the current study the investigators wish to evaluate the effect the doctors and midwives in the delivery room have on the timing and modality of analgesia chosen by the participants. The participants will be randomly divided into 2 groups. Both groups will be advised of the different modalities of analgesia available during labor. One group will be managed in the delivery room the same as if not part of the study, meaning the doctors and midwives will treat the participants the way they usually do regarding analgesia. The second group of participants will not be asked by the doctors and midwives about analgesia at all but will be able to receive analgesia by a modality of choice at the timing of choice.

Women are showing a growing interest in less medicalized childbirth. According to the french 2021 perinatal survey, 52.2% of women want to limit medical procedures and 38.2% of women want childbirth without epidural anesthesia. Between 77 and 82% of deliveries nevertheless lead to an epidural anesthesia. The painful feeling seems to be the main motivation for using this mode of anesthesia.

Pain During Childbirth is a Complex and Subjective Experience. The Degree of a Woman's Suffering in Childbirth Depends on the Intensity of Labour Pain and Many Indirect Factors. Complex Interrelated Effects on Labour Pain Are Limited by the Little Number of Studies Available. That is Why it is Necessary to Determine the Probable Factors That May Affect the Intensity of Pain.

Women's experience of pain during labor varies greatly, and pain control is a major concern for obstetricians. Several methods have been studied for pain management for women in labor, including drug and non-drug interventions Most methods of non-pharmacological pain management are non-invasive and appear to be safe for mother and baby, including immersion in water, relaxation, acupuncture, and massage. However, their efficacy is unclear, and based mostly on non-randomized studies. On the other hand, there are strong data to support the efficacy of pharmacological methods, including epidural analgesia, which improves pain relief but increase the incidence of operative vaginal delivery Recently a clinical trial showed that music in labor was associated with maternal benefits in women who underwent spontaneous vaginal delivery. However, the effect of music in labor in women undergoing induction of labor is still a subject of debate.

Procedural skills play an important role in anaesthetic expertise. More focused training and assessment of procedural skills will be needed in the future as training moves from an apprenticeship based training system to competency based assessment. Currently various techniques exists to assess procedural skills of anaesthetist. For epidural catheter placement, task specific check list, global rating scales and cumulative sum techniques have been developed and validated. These techniques aim either for better qualitative outcome sacrificing objectivity or rely on self-reporting. A decrease in objectivity in turn hampers inter-rater reliability which is an essential component of a valid assessment model. Checklists type assessments force the developer to comprehensively characterize the procedure of interest and then validate the completed procedure characterization. This approach has been quantitatively shown to have higher assessment reliability levels compared to Likert-scale assessment. The objective of the project is to develop and validate a comprehensive procedure characterization for labor epidural catheter placement. Another objective is to compare this new assessment tool with existing checklist and global rating scale for labor epidural to establish concurrent validity.5 A well-developed objective, validated procedure characterization serves as a master tool which has multiple applications. It helps to build a training programme for the procedure, allows providing metrics based feedback to trainees using simulator, helps to assess the performance of trainees and in future might be used as benchmark to allow competency based progression in the training.

This is a mixed methods longitudinal observational study to assess patient and provider perspectives on pain and pain management among pregnant women with opiate use disorder (OUD). The findings from this study will inform patient-centered approaches to pain management. Themes surrounding mothers' pain/recovery experiences that correlate with quantified pain and analgesia endpoints will be identified. Findings will also shape an appropriate patient-centered research agenda for obstetric pain management in patients with OUD.

*Primary: To compare the control group, women in the experimental group will have lower level of labor pain after the intervention of peanut ball usage. *Secondary: To compare the control group, women in the experimental group will have higher level of support and control after the intervention of peanut ball usage; To compare the control group, women in the experimental group will have lower level of anxiety after intervention of peanut ball usage; To compare the control group, women in the experimental group will have shorter duration of labor after intervention of peanut ball usage.

Labor is widely recognized as one of the most painful experience possible. The standard analgesic treatment currently consists of pharmacological methods. Adverse effects, complication risks, psychological effects, limit these techniques as well as high costs. These limits concurred to the application of these techniques mainly on demand and not routinely. have not, as of today, met a large scientific consensus, as shown by many recent Cochrane reviews. A promising perspective for non-pharmacological analgesia seems to be offered by Virtual Reality (VR) devices, which have been applied to many different medical areas.