Active clinical trials for "Lung Diseases, Obstructive"

A preliminary study to evaluate a new nasal interface and portable ventilator system in comparison to standard oxygen therapy in patients with severe chronic lung disease.

The DREAMING clinical trial is part of the DREAMING project, which has the objective to demonstrate that the DREAMING platform consisting of integrated health monitoring, alarm handling and videoconferencing services produces clinical benefits to its users and economic benefits to the health authorities. The study evaluates the long-term (30 months) effect of continuous use of the DREAMING subsystems and is testing the hypothesis that such use is superior to usual care alone in reducing the deterioration of health related quality of life that is associated to age and chronic disease. It also tests the hypothesis that the DREAMING environment is superior to usual care in delaying the transfer to nursing or elderly homes and in reducing the incidence and duration of hospitalisation episodes. The trial will also evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the DREAMING platform. Outcomes are assessed in six different health care systems (Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Italy, Spain and Sweden) and will represent a basis for the adoption of DREAMING services by the respective health authorities.

This is a Congressionally mandated study. In the original study, 16 demonstration programs provided care coordination services to beneficiaries with chronic illness in Medicare's fee-for-service program. A five-year CMS-funded study tested whether the programs can improve patients' use of medical services, improve patients' outcomes and satisfaction with care, and reduce Medicare costs. The study also assessed physicians' satisfaction with the programs. In 2008 Congress extended the project for two of the original programs--Mercy Medical Center - North Iowa and Health Quality Partners in Pennsylvania--and they will enroll Medicare beneficiaries and provide care coordination services into the spring of 2010.

The aim of this clinical trial is to establish the non-inferiority of home-based respiratory rehabilitation compared to respiratory rehabilitation in center in terms of exercise tolerance as evaluated by the 6 minutes Stepper test.. This trial will also 1°) evaluate the Medico-economic aspects of the home-based Respiratory rehabilitation versus respiratory Rehabilitation in center; 2°) analyse the patient preferences between home-based respiratory rehabilitation and respiratory rehabilitation in center and 3°) Compare home-based respiratory rehabilitation vs respiratory rehabilitation in center in terms of dyspnea, quality of life, anxiety and depression.

Pulmonary rehabilitation is an essential non pharmacological treatment option which reduces dyspnea sensations, increase exercise tolerance, improves health related quality of life and reduces the burden on health care resources (1). Pulmonary rehabilitation is likely an ideal intervention to validate the PROactive tool as responses to pulmonary rehabilitation are clinically significant in terms of exercise tolerance and particularly activity related symptoms. Nevertheless, the response to pulmonary rehabilitation is variable and about one out of three patients does not present a clinically important response. Pulmonary rehabilitation may therefore be an intervention that allows studying the conceptual model around the PROactive tools, anchoring the new PROs (Patient Report Outcome) to outcomes that are well known to change with rehabilitation: exercise induced symptoms, functional exercise tolerance and health related quality of life. Study objectives Main objectives A primary aim is to test reliability of the paper-pencil versus the electronic scoring version of the PROactive tool in terms of assessing the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on the components of the PROactive tool and on the mode of administration. The secondary aim of the proposed project is to investigate the effects of a multidisciplinary outpatient hospital-based, pulmonary rehabilitation program on: i) daily physical activity (number of daily steps, vector magnitude unit and movement intensity and ii) the components of the Proactive tool. Additional study objectives A third aim of this project is to investigate whether the magnitude of change in daily physical activity and the components of the PROactive tool in general is associated with the magnitude of changes in frequently used rehabilitation related end-points including, functional capacity, exercise capacity and health-related quality of life following the completion of a comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation program. A forth aim of this project is to investigate whether the magnitude of change in daily physical activity and the components of the PROactive tool in general is associated with the magnitude of changes in physiological indices including cardiovascular and respiratory adaptations following completion of a comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation program.

The World Health Organisation defines chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as 'not one single disease but an umbrella term used to describe chronic lung diseases that cause limitations in lung airflow' covering emphysema and chronic bronchitis; and estimates (2004) that worldwide there are currently 64 million sufferers with 3 to 4 million in the UK. COPD results from damaged airways in the lungs, causing them to become narrower and making it harder for air to get in and out of the lungs. It is diagnosed by measuring the amount of air that can be expelled in the first second of breathing out (FEV1) in litres per second. COPD is a progressive disease and the condition can have a serious impact on the quality of life of sufferers. Going out in very cold weather can cause an immediate drop in FEV1, and increased breathlessness. This is a randomised crossover controlled trial of participants with COPD. It compares the effectiveness of an air-warming face mask which covers the mouth compared with no face covering, in increasing participants exercise capacity and quality of life in cold weather. The mask warms air at the mouth by drawing on air warmed beneath the participants clothing, through a 20cm long hollow plastic tube and a one-way inspiratory valve into the mask. Air is expired through the nose. 24 participants with moderate or severe COPD, will undertake 3 exercise tests on 3 separate days. Two tests will be in an environmentally controlled chamber performed at 5°C with participants wearing either the mask or no face covering. The third test will be performed at ambient temperature outside the chamber. The order will be determined by random allocation. Participants will undergo the Treadmill 6 Minute Walk Test; various measurements will be taken, all of which will be non-invasive.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease due to incurable and prevalence has increased steadily, chronic respiratory disease is considered hazardous to health and quality of life of the disease. GOLD treatment guidelines (global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease guideline) pointed out the pulmonary rehabilitation is one of the non-drug treatment in patients with severe COPD, shown to improve exercise capacity and reduce the short of breathing, improve the quality of life and reduce the anxiety associated and depression and improved survival advantages. Meanwhile, a few studies have examined effect the exercise training in severe COPD patients' symptom distress and quality of life, so as to make severe COPD patients to improve the effectiveness of the campaign to ongoing regular pulmonary rehabilitation movement, is considered an important issue. It has been proposed that physical activity enhancement or exercise training can be effective in improving symptoms and quality of life in these patients. However, it has not been examined systematically. Therefore, the main purposes of this study are: 1.Prevalence of symptom distress; 2.The physical preferences; 3.The relationship between quality of life and physical activity; 4.Effects of Comprehensive Health coaching exercise training on improving fatigue, sleep disturbances, quality of life, readmission, and survival. In the first year of this study, a descriptive-correlational design will be used and in the second and third years of study, the experimental design and prospective longitudinal study will be undertaken. Instruments include motion sensors, physical activity scale, Physical Activity Preferences, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality of Life Index. Statistical analyses include descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, latent growth modeling, Logistic models, GEE, and survival analysis. Results from this study will provide important implications for improving symptom management and quality of life for sever chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

This study evaluates the effect of of a structured self-management intervention plan in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care setting.Half of the participants will receive the self-management plan while the other half will receive usual care.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a respiratory disease that results in progressive airflow limitation and respiratory distress. Physiopathological features of COPD suggest that people who suffer from this disease have many risk factors for falls that have been identified in older individuals. Risk of falls is multi-factorial and impaired balance has been shown to contribute. The investigators aimed to demonstrate that, IMT performed during a PRP may improve Postural control in COPD patients.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has a significant impact on quality of life and is costly to the health care system. It has been demonstrated that a self-management program improves quality of life, but programs are not universally available and telehealth interventions can provide home-based support, but have mixed results. The aims of this study are to (1) assess the feasibility and acceptability of a 6 weeks' educational program related to self-management with remote monitoring for Lebanese COPD patients; (2) pre-test its impact on quality of life, emergency visits, and rate of rehospitalization, and (3) to make recommendations for a future randomized trial.