Active clinical trials for "Lung Diseases, Obstructive"

General Objective: To compare the prognostic value of the FODE scale for COPD exacerbations, where the fat-free mass index (FFMI) will be measured instead of the body mass index (BMI) in the BODE scale. Specific objectives: to describe the nutritional status of COPD patients according by the GesEPOC and GOLD phenotypes; to compare the mortality prognostic value of FODE with BODE; to compare the exacerbations and mortality prognostic value of the BODCAT scale, which includes the CAT questionnaire instead of the six-minute walking test (6MWT), with BODE; to compare the mortality prognostic value of the FODE and FODEx scales, where the BMI and the 6MWT will be substituted by the FFMI and the severe exacerbations in the previous year, respectively, with BODE and BODEx. Methods: prospective, with no intervention besides the recommendations of COPD clinical guidelines, where patients will be allocated into three parallel and open groups according to their forced expiratory flow in the first second (FEV1) in the fashion FEV1 < 30%: FEV1 30-50% : FEV1 > 50%, and will be followed for at least two years. FFMI will be measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Exacerbations and mortality will be recorded during follow-up to evaluate the prognostic value of the FODE scale, which hypothetically will increase in 10% the prognostic value of the BODE scale.

Our study aiming for determining the combined effect of selective manual therapy techniques in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

People living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may experience worsening of symptoms such as shortness of breath, cough and wheezing in addition to changes that may be expected for having COPD. The worsening of symptoms is called exacerbations or flare-ups and can be debilitating and frightening, requiring additional treatment, often with azithromycin. This is an antibiotic medicine that also has anti-inflammatory properties. It is prescribed as long-term prevention to reduce the risk of flare-ups. Some people may be affected by side effects from azithromycin. Antibiotic resistance is another concern, especially when using azithromycin for prevention rather than to treat active infection. It is currently unclear as to whether people should be advised to stop taking azithromycin once COPD has stabilised, or to stop it over the summer when fewer flare-ups happen. It is also not known if azithromycin is more effective in some people or more likely to cause side effects in others. Given these uncertainties, it is challenging to know how best to use azithromycin in managing COPD. Azithromycin is a valuable antibiotic, and should be prescribed where it has benefit but avoid unnecessary side effects and reduce the chances of bacteria becoming resistant to it. The purpose of this trial is to be able to gain results to answer these questions, and to establish the effects of stopping azithromycin in people whose COPD has stabilised, who have been taking it for at least 3 months. This trial will compare continuing azithromycin with stopping it completely, or stopping over the summer only, continuing over the winter. The investigators will compare the effects of these three treatments in the trial on flare-ups, symptoms and quality of life, and find out what factors may affect how individual participants respond to them.

The aim of this proof-of-concept study is to obtain data that will contribute to the development of sensor devices (biosensor and environmental sensor) for patients with lung diseases (e.g. COPD). The study aims to validate our previous results from healthy subjects by joint testing of the biosensor and environmental device in a real-world setting. Healthy subjects and COPD subjects will be exposed to air of a traffic dense urban region ("urban" air) and to filtered indoor air ("clean" air) during activity and rest. Environmental and biomarker sensors will be used to measure several biomarkers and environmental conditions.

Blood eosinophils are a type of white blood cell that helps fight infection. They have a number of different functions but are primarily involved in numerous inflammatory processes. They are recruited from the blood into sites of inflammation. In patients with COPD, higher blood eosinophil count (BEC) predicts a greater reduction in moderate and severe exacerbations in response to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease strategy (GOLD 2019) recommends the use of BEC to guide ICS therapy and states that eosinophil levels above 300 cells/μL can help identify responders, guiding initial dual therapy, with "little or no effect at a BEC < 100 cells/μL". The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) COPD 2018 guideline states that a higher BEC is associated with ICS response, but does not specify a threshold. Earlier research studies have suggested that at lower levels of BEC the harm of ICS due to pneumonia is greater than the benefit of severe exacerbation reduction. Patients with COPD can have "flare ups" of their disease known as exacerbations. Blood eosinophils play a critical role in assessing severity of these exacerbations and guiding management. The association between BEC and reduction in exacerbation frequency is based on BEC measured when the patient is clinically stable. Transient low eosinophil count (eosinopenia with BEC < 50 cells/μL) during severe exacerbation is extremely common. In the Dyspnoea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidaemia and atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) score derivation and validation studies combined, eosinopenia was present on admission in 1,340 of 2,645 severe exacerbations of COPD (ECOPD) and is associated with longer length of stay, higher in-hospital and one year mortality. Although eosinophilic COPD exacerbations occur, overall BEC during moderate or severe exacerbation is lower than stable state. In ECOPD managed in critical care low BEC is associated with higher rate of septic shock and mortality. BEC are also suppressed during other acute illnesses, notably sepsis. Failure to recognise that BEC are often suppressed during acute illness compared to stable state may lead to ICS therapy being inappropriately withheld. The effect of exacerbation and other acute illnesses on eosinophils is under-appreciated. Both NICE and GOLD guidelines fail to mention whether BEC should be prospectively measured when patients are stable (reflecting RCT evidence), or if reliance on historical values is acceptable. In routine practice some clinicians rely on previous BECs to avoid a delay in treatment decisions. A number of these historical counts will have been taken during illness, underestimating the patients' stable-state BEC. Conversely, COPD is associated with other medical conditions, and BEC may be requested for reasons other than acute illness. Using the highest BEC from multiple measures in the previous 24 months may therefore better agree with stable state counts. The primary aim of this trial is to assess the reliability of using BEC over the preceding 24 months to assess COPD eosinophil phenotype at both GOLD thresholds. The primary outcome will be based on using the highest of at least three BEC. Secondary outcomes include a) the level of agreement between baseline stable state BEC and both mean and the highest BEC over the preceding 24 months, b) the influence of the number of BEC measures available and c) the effect of limiting the time frame from 24 months to the previous 12 months. BEC is associated with disease severity, providing further evidence that COPD eosinophil phenotype may change over time. As an exploratory analysis, periods of sustained change in eosinophil phenotype will be sought, and the relationship between eosinophil phenotype and patient characteristics and certain medication will be assessed. The investigators will also assess the relations between the dependent variables stable state absolute eosinophil and basophil counts and both eosinophil to basophil and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios and the following clinical outcomes: a) moderate and severe exacerbations and b) mortality. Some of these variables have previously been shown to be related to disease severity and mortality.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a lung disease characterized by respiratory problems and poor airflow with dyspnea and cough being the main symptoms. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are the most important events for patients with COPD that have a negative impact on patients´ quality of life, accelerate disease progression, and can result in hospital admissions and death. It is of major clinical importance to determine predictors of an AECOPD and to identify patients who are at high risk for developing an acute exacerbation and/or to detect the beginning of or prevent an ongoing acute exacerbation as early as possible. Until now, research in the field of AECOPD has gathered and analyzed data only after manifestation of AECOPD until recovery and most of them used a retrospective study design. Therefore, the aim of this prospective trial is to collect clinical data in patients prior to the first visible clinical signs of an AECOPD to investigate potential early predictors of an AECOPD.

Chronicle obstructive pulmonary disease is a worldwide cause of mortality and morbidity. This systemic disease progressively leads to dyspnea, muscle wasting and exercise capacity impairment. Pulmonary rehabilitation is a cornerstone in the management of these systemic effects. Unfortunately, access to pulmonary rehabilitation is limited for many people who would benefit from it, primarily because of a lack of pulmonary rehabilitation and assessment centers. Optimal assessment should include cardiopulmonary exercise testing to determine both the optimal training settings as well as any cardiopulmonary contraindications to pulmonary rehabilitation. However, this is not available in most centers and when it is, consultations are limited. Therefore, pulmonary rehabilitation is often delayed for several weeks and patients can lose motivation. In order to promote pulmonary rehabilitation, the incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing could be replaced by field tests to individualize pulmonary rehabilitation prescription. The 6-minute stepper test is a new field tool. Its sensitivity and reproducibility have previously been reported in patients with chronicle obstructive pulmonary disease. It is easy to set up in the clinical setting and could be used to individualize pulmonary rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a prediction equation to set rehabilitation intensity for patients with severe to very severe chronicle obstructive pulmonary disease attending pulmonary rehabilitation, with the use of a simple, readily available field test. Therefore the investigators sought to determine, if it exists, a relationship between the plateau heart rate from the first and last 3 minutes of the 6-minute stepper test and the heart rate from the first ventilatory threshold from the cardiopulmonary exercise testing in order to individualize pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with severe to very severe chronicle obstructive pulmonary disease.

Study is conducted to assess the prevalence and structure of comorbidity among patients undergoing abdominal surgery and produce the stratification of the risk of postoperative complications by identifying independent predictors for its development.

The aim of this Post Authorisation Safety Study (PASS) is to assess the incidence of adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in COPD patients who are new to inhaled fixed triple therapy (dual bronchodilator plus corticosteroid) administered via Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) compared to new users of pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler (pMDI). Data from clinical practice from different European data sources will be collected. The baseline hypothesis is that the DPI is not associated with different risks of the primary and secondary outcomes, compared with pMDI.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic lung disease affecting an estimated 1 in 10 Canadians. Symptoms include persistent shortness of breath, cough and sputum production. The symptoms can be serious when people with COPD experience a flare of their disease and may lead to hospitalization or death. Improving other conditions that affect COPD control is one way to improve the health of people with COPD. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common breathing problem during sleep, and commonly co-exists with COPD. Although diagnosing and treating OSA is encouraged, it has not been highlighted in guidelines that recommend ideal COPD care. People with COPD and OSA have lower sleep quality and lower oxygen levels during sleep compared to people with OSA. Despite these differences, treatment of OSA in people with COPD is modeled after treatment of OSA in the general population, generally using treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with the possible addition of oxygen through the CPAP machine. There are few studies looking at other types of treatment including noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in people with COPD and OSA. The majority of studies of NIV in COPD has been for people with other reasons to use NIV including acute respiratory failure or chronic hypercarbic respiratory failure and did not include people with risk factors for OSA or who had undergone overnight sleep studies. In Alberta, NIV is provided province wide for people who have both OSA who do not meet certain physiologic targets in their oxygen levels or breathing patterns after CPAP is applied on an overnight sleep study. NIV is provided preferentially to CPAP and oxygen, providing an opportunity to look at health outcomes when NIV is used instead of CPAP for the treatment of patients with COPD. Through this study, we will measure whether people with COPD and a sleep related breathing disorder such as OSA have fewer severe flares of COPD after starting CPAP or NIV. We will evaluate whether the number of Emergency Department visits, hospitalizations or deaths lowers after starting CPAP or NIV.