Active clinical trials for "Lung Diseases, Obstructive"

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide. This systemic disease progressively leads to dyspnea and exercise capacity impairment. Pulmonary rehabilitation effectively improves exercise capacity, dyspnea and quality of life in patients with COPD. However, its benefits progressively fade over time due to several factors such as the lack of regular exercise activity, dyspnea, airway secretions, hematosis impairment and acute exacerbations which can lead to hospitalization and accelerated muscle wasting. Nasal high flow (NHF) is a support used to deliver heated and humidified high flow air (up to 60 L/min) through nasal canula providing promising physiological benefits such as positive airway pressure or upper airway carbon dioxide washout. It can be used in association with oxygen and offers the advantage to overtake the patient's inspiratory flow, providing a stable inspired fraction of oxygen. Nasal high flow has widely been studied in pediatric and adult intensive care units and seems better than conventional oxygen therapy and as effective as noninvasive ventilation with regards to mortality to treat hypoxemic acute respiratory failure. More recently, several studies have shown that long-term nasal high flow could contribute to improve exercise capacity, dyspnea, airway secretion removal, hematosis, reduced acute exacerbations and subsequent hospitalizations in patients with COPD. Based on these results, the primary aim of this study is to assess whether long-term nasal high flow treatment can help COPD patients to better maintain their endurance capacity following a course of pulmonary rehabilitation.

The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate that the ECCO2R pulsatile configuration prevents the Willebrand factor high molecular weight multimers decrease observed under continuous blood flow configurations. The secondary objectives are to quantify the CO2 extracorporeal removal in the pulsatile configuration, to describe complications (hemorrhagic, thrombotic and hemolytic), to describe patients' gas exchanges under ECCO2R, to describe the clinical course of the patients under ECCO2R as well as during the whole stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

This study will evaluate safety and efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI via ELLIPTA® inhaler. ELLIPTA is a registered trademark of GlaxoSmithKline group of companies.

Patients with moderate to severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are often complicated with hypercapnia and respiratory failure, so they need to be admitted to ICU for monitoring and respiratory support treatment. Noninvasive ventilation has become the first-line respiratory support for the treatment of AECOPD with hypercapnia and respiratory failure. However, 26-54% of AECOPD patients with hypercapnia and respiratory failure eventually fail to receive noninvasive ventilation and need endotracheal intubation and invasive ventilation to maintain effective gas exchange. For these patients, the in-hospital survival rate is only 31-76%, and the prognosis is poor. In AECOPD patients with high risk of noninvasive ventilation failure and expected need of intubation, timely giving other ways of respiratory support to reduce blood CO2 may avoid patients receiving tracheal intubation and invasive ventilation, thus avoiding related complications and adverse prognosis. As a new type of respiratory support technology, ECCO2R is worthy of attention in monitoring and evaluation of support effect in AECOPD patients with respiratory failure. It is urgent that ECCO2R can effectively alleviate respiratory failure, avoid complications related to tracheal intubation, improve quality of life and reduce mortality.

Chronic Respiratory Diseases (CRDs) are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, ranking as the third leading cause of death worldwide. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a fundamental evidence-based intervention for the management of a variety of CRDs, such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILDs). However, the benefits of PR tend to decline over time and there is currently no strong evidence that patients translate those benefits into a more active lifestyle. There is an urgent need for evidence-based interventions to promote physical activity (PA) participation, whilst maintaining PR positive effects in the long-term. Community-based PA interventions adjusted to the local context, as well as patients' needs and preferences, might be a key strategy to meet this target. CENTR(AR) will be a sustainable response to support healthy lifestyles and enhance long-term PR benefits, by providing access to PR within Primary Healthcare Centres (PHC), followed by the inclusion in a community-based PA program, which embraces urban facilities and available resources.

People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience distressing breathlessness and high health care utilisation. There is compelling evidence that pulmonary rehabilitation improves symptoms and reduces hospitalisation, but is delivered to <10% of patients who would benefit. The investigators developed a low cost model of pulmonary rehabilitation that can be delivered entirely at home. The HomeBase model had equivalent outcomes to centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation in a phase II efficacy trial, with higher completion rates. The investigators hypothesise that a patient centred model offering a choice between home or centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation may increase program completion rates, with improved outcomes for patients and the health system. This is a cluster randomised implementation trial investigating whether offering a choice of home or centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation can reduce hospitalisation, improve pulmonary rehabilitation completion and enhance patient outcomes in people with COPD. 14 pulmonary rehabilitation programs located across Australia will each recruit 35 people with COPD. Intervention centres: People with COPD will be offered the choice of centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation or the HomeBase model. Comparison centres: Only the existing centre-based model will be offered. The primary outcome is all cause, non-elective hospitalisation at 12 months. Other outcomes are symptoms, exercise capacity and quality of life at 8 weeks and 12 months; and health care costs at 12 months for full economic evaluation.

The aim of the study will be to verify whether the addition of an exercise program aimed to improve balance can reduce the risk of falling in subjects with COPD over 80 years of age compared to the standard rehabilitation program. Patients will be randomly assigned in two groups (intervention and control). The pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program is organized in accordance with current guidelines.

It will be a randomized control trial. Participants will be recruited according to inclusion criteria and will be allocated into 2 groups using convenience sampling technique. Group 1 will be treated with percussion technique for 30 min and group 2 with blow bottle technique combined with percussion technique for 30 min at DHQ Teaching Hospital Gujranwala. Intervention will be carried out for total 4 weeks of duration with 3 sessions per week. Outcome measures such as dyspnea, breathlessness, sputum and cough, O2 and pulse rate, expiratory flow rate will be measured by tools as mMRC, BCSS, peak flow meter respectively. Assessment will be done before and after intervention and result will be analyzed using statistical package for social sciences SPSS 20.

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is an important event in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Compound sodium chlolate and aminophylline tablets are one of the most widely used drugs for the treatment of bronchial asthma and chronic bronchitis.

Acute exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) are a major source of morbidity and mortality for patients and cost to the society. In case of acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia and acidosis, Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) is preferred as a first line treatment. NIV failures are not uncommon, from 15% in intensive care to 25 - 30% in emergency departments. They most often occur at the start of the NIV or in the hours that follow. There are many reasons for these failure. Among these are; dyspnea, discomfort, the pain related to the exacerbation and also to the NIV are frequently noted. The use of certain drugs with anxiolytic, hypnotic and/or analgesic properties could also be useful. Some sedatives and opioids have already been studied in this indication but without a therapeutic trial and satisfactory methodology. Among the molecules of interest, Morphine seems interesting . It's administration could reduce the ventilatory rate, intensity of dyspnea, pain and anxiety as well as dynamic hyperinflation. The investigators believe that morphine administration will decrease the rate of early NIV failure by improving comfort (decreased dyspnea and pain) and ventilation (decreased respiratory rate and increase in tidal volume) in patients with exacerbations of COPD. However, before considering a randomized phase III efficacy study, it is necessary to determine the optimal dose of morphine in this indication, through a phase I/II dose-finding study taking into accounts both the efficacy and toxicity of morphine. The main objective of this study, is to determine the optimal dose of morphine administered at the initiation of NIV in patient with acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), which is defined as the maximum gain function combining the probability of dose-limiting toxicity with PaCO2.Therefore, the impact of morphine administration on the physiological parameters of NIV- COPD exacerbation patients will be assessed.