Active clinical trials for "Lung Diseases, Obstructive"

This study is designed to assess the effect of QVA149 (110/50 ug q.d.) versus placebo on pulmonary function and average physical activity levels in patients with moderate to severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

This study will assess the efficacy, tolerability and safety of NVA237 compared to tiotropium when added on to fluticasone/salmeterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Dyspnea (respiratory discomfort) and activity limitation are the most common symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and contribute importantly to a perceived poor quality of life. Recent international guidelines have stressed the importance of dyspnea alleviation and improvement exercise tolerance as a means of enhancing quality of life and other long term outcomes in this population. Modern pharmacotherapy is the first step in symptom management but the overall impact of bronchodilator therapy is relatively small. Exercise training remains the most effective treatment for ameliorating dyspnea and improving exercise endurance and was the main focus of this study. The main objectives of the study were: To conduct and compare detailed studies of respiratory mechanics during cycle exercise before and after exercise training (EXT) compared with an untrained control group. By multiple regression analysis, the investigators will establish the main contributors to dyspnea relief after EXT. To compare the magnitude of change in endurance during constant work rate cycle exercise with those measured during walk tests and the endurance shuttle walk test after EXT relative to control. To evaluate which test (constant work rate cycle, six-minute walk test, or endurance shuttle walk test) is the most sensitive test for measuring changes in endurance after EXT versus control. To compare the change in standardized dyspnea ratings (Borg Scale) during constant-load cycling with a variety of other activity-related dyspnea questionnaires. To evaluate which of these measurements is the most sensitive for examining changes in perceived discomfort during exercise. To evaluate the contribution of psychological factors (anxiety, fear, respiratory panic, self-efficacy) to the perceived improvement of symptoms following EXT. The investigators will use multiple regression analysis to examine associations between changes in perceived dyspnea and changes in anxiety and self-efficacy measured by validated questionnaires and Borg intensity ratings?

This is a phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, combination and component, two-period, incomplete block design cross-over study using GSK573719/GW642444. The primary objective is to evaluate lung function and exercise endurance time after 12 weeks of once-daily administration of GSK573719/GW642444 Inhalation Powder (125/25mcg and 62.5/25mcg), GSK573719 Inhalation Powder (125mcg and 62.5mcg), GW642444 Inhalation Powder 25 mcg and placebo delivered by a Novel dry powder inhaler (Novel DPI)

This is a 52-week treatment, multi-center, randomized, open label, parallel group study to assess the long term safety and tolerability of once-daily QVA149 (indacaterol and NVA237 ([glycopyrronium bromide]) using tiotropium as an active control in Japanese patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Regular exercise can help patients with the lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). But COPD patients have a hard time with training because of their breathing. To improve their program they can train with one leg at a time. Another way is to make their exercise easier by breathing helium. Putting two methods, one-legged and helium, together may improve their program even more. This project is planned to assess whether breathing helium improves their one-legged exercise endurance. If it does, then there may be a reason for combining one-legged exercise with breathing helium as part of their respiratory rehabilitation program. The aim of this study is to determine whether breathing helium-hyperoxia enables a further increase in the constant power endurance time during one-legged exercise in ventilatory limited subjects with COPD. The null hypothesis is that patients will have sufficient peripheral muscle limitation that ventilatory unloading using helium-hyperoxia will be of no additional benefit to exercise tolerance. The investigators hypothesize that patients with COPD are so ventilatory limited relative to their peripheral muscles that helium-hyperoxia will improve their exercise endurance.

This study is primarily designed to assess the dose response, dose interval, efficacy and safety of three once daily (QD) doses (100mcg, 400mcg and 800mcg) and three twice daily (BID) doses (100mcg, 200mcg and 400mcg,) of GSK961081 administered via DISKUS™ for 28 days in subjects with moderate/severe COPD versus placebo. Salmeterol 50mcg BID is included in the study as an active comparator.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 24-hour spirometry effect (FEV1) of FF/VI 100/25mcg once daily compared with Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol 250/50mcg twice daily over a 12-week treatment period in subjects with COPD.

This is a phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, combination and component, two-period, incomplete block design cross-over study using GSK573719/GW642444. The primary objective is to evaluate lung function and exercise endurance time after 12 weeks of once-daily administration of GSK573719/GW642444 Inhalation Powder (125/25mcg and 62.5/25mcg), GSK573719 Inhalation Powder (125mcg and 62.5mcg), GW642444 Inhalation Powder 25 mcg and placebo delivered by a Novel dry powder inhaler (Novel DPI).

The study is a single-center randomized, unblinded, placebo-controlled study to investigate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in subjects with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).